Benchmark - Electronic Health Record Implementation Paper

Benchmark – Electronic Health Record Implementation Paper

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

2.3: Develop leadership skills to collaborate on interprofessional teams in the provision of evidence-based, patient-centered care.

5.2: Apply professional, ethical, and regulatory standards of practice in the provision of safe, effective health care.

One way informatics can be especially valuable is in capturing data to inspire improvements and quality change in practice. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) collects data related to adverse events and safety concerns. If you are working within a practice setting to implement a new electronic health record (EHR) system, this is just one of the many considerations your team would need to plan for during the rollout process. Benchmark – Electronic Health Record Implementation Paper

In a paper of 1,250-1,500 words, address the following questions related to the advanced registered nurse’s role during this type of scenario:

1) What key information would be needed in the database that would allow you to track opportunities for care improvement?

2) What role does informatics play in the ability to capture this data?

3) Which systems and staff members would need to be involved in the design and implementation process and team?

4) What professional, ethical, and regulatory standards must be incorporated into the design and implementation of the system?

5)How would the EHR team ensure that all order sets are part of the new record?

6) How would you communicate the changes, including any kind of transition plan?

7) What measures and steps would you take to evaluate the success of the EHR implementation from a staff, setting, and patient perspective?

8) What leadership skills and theories would facilitate collaboration with the interprofessional team and provide evidence-based, patient-centered care?

You are required to cite five to 10 sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – Benchmark – Electronic Health Record Implementation

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. Benchmark – Electronic Health Record Implementation

APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours. Benchmark – Electronic Health Record Implementation

Guarantee

Zero Plagiarism
On-time delivery
A-Grade Papers
Free Revision
24/7 Support
100% Confidentiality
Professional Writers

Services Offered

Custom paper writing
Question and answers
Essay paper writing
Editing and proofreading
Plagiarism removal services
Multiple answer questions

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Rubric_Print_Format.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code	Class Code	Assignment Title	Total Points
NUR-514	NUR-514-O101	Benchmark – Electronic Health Record Implementation Paper	210.0
Criteria	Percentage	Unsatisfactory (0.00%)	Less than Satisfactory (80.00%)	Satisfactory (88.00%)	Good (92.00%)	Excellent (100.00%)	Comments	Points Earned
Content	70.0%
Key Information Needed in the Database to Track Opportunities for Care Improvement	10.0%	A discussion of key information needed in the database to track opportunities for care improvement is not included.	A discussion of key information needed in the database to track opportunities for care improvement is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.	A discussion of key information needed in the database to track opportunities for care improvement is present.	A discussion of key information needed in the database to track opportunities for care improvement is clearly provided and well developed.	A comprehensive discussion of key information needed in the database to track opportunities for care improvement is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Role Informatics Plays in the Ability to Capture This Data	10.0%	A discussion of the role informatics plays in the ability to capture this data is not included.	A discussion of the role informatics plays in the ability to capture this data is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.	A discussion of the role informatics plays in the ability to capture this data is present.	A discussion of the role informatics plays in the ability to capture this data is clearly provided and well developed.	A comprehensive discussion of the role informatics plays in the ability to capture this data is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
The Systems and Staff Members that Would Need to Be Involved in the Design and Implementation Process and Team	10.0%	A discussion of the systems and staff members that would need to be involved in the design and implementation process and team is not included.	A discussion of the systems and staff members that would need to be involved in the design and implementation process and team is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.	A discussion of the systems and staff members that would need to be involved in the design and implementation process and team is present.	A discussion of the systems and staff members that would need to be involved in the design and implementation process and team is clearly provided and well developed.	A comprehensive discussion of the systems and staff members that would need to be involved in the design and implementation process and team is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Professional, Ethical, and Regulatory Standards That Must Be Incorporated Into the Design and Implementation of the System (5.2)	10.0%	A discussion of professional, ethical, and regulatory standards that must be incorporated into the design and implementation of the system is not included.	A discussion of professional, ethical, and regulatory standards that must be incorporated into the design and implementation of the system is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.	A discussion of professional, ethical, and regulatory standards that must be incorporated into the design and implementation of the system is present.	A discussion of professional, ethical, and regulatory standards that must be incorporated into the design and implementation of the system is clearly provided and well developed.	A comprehensive discussion of professional, ethical, and regulatory standards that must be incorporated into the design and implementation of the system is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
How the EHR Team Would Ensure That All Order Sets Are Part of the New Record	5.0%	A discussion of how the EHR team would ensure that all order sets are part of the new record is not included.	A discussion of how the EHR team would ensure that all order sets are part of the new record is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.	A discussion of how the EHR team would ensure that all order sets are part of the new record is present.	A discussion of how the EHR team would ensure that all order sets are part of the new record is clearly provided and well developed.	A comprehensive discussion of how the EHR team would ensure that all order sets are part of the new record is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Communication of the Changes, Including Any Kind of Transition Plan	5.0%	A discussion of how to communicate the changes, including any kind of transition plan, is not included.	A discussion of how to communicate the changes, including any kind of transition plan, is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.	A discussion of how to communicate the changes, including any kind of transition plan, is present.	A discussion of how to communicate the changes, including any kind of transition plan, is clearly provided and well developed.	A comprehensive discussion of how to communicate the changes, including any kind of transition plan, is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Measures and Steps to Evaluate the Success of the EHR Implementation	5.0%	A discussion of measures and steps to evaluate the success of the EHR implementation is not included.	A discussion of measures and steps to evaluate the success of the EHR implementation is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.	A discussion of measures and steps to evaluate the success of the EHR implementation is present.	A discussion of measures and steps to evaluate the success of the EHR implementation is clearly provided and well developed.	A comprehensive discussion of measures and steps to evaluate the success of the EHR implementation is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Leadership Skills, Theories, and Styles to Employ for Collaboration on Interprofessional Teams Participating in the Legislative Process and Providing Evidence-Based, Patient-Centered Care (2.3)	10.0%	A discussion of leadership skills, theories, and styles to employ for collaboration on interprofessional teams participating in the legislative process and providing evidence-based, patient-centered care is not included.	A discussion of leadership skills, theories, and styles to employ for collaboration on interprofessional teams participating in the legislative process and providing evidence-based, patient-centered care is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.	A discussion of leadership skills, theories, and styles to employ for collaboration on interprofessional teams participating in the legislative process and providing evidence-based, patient-centered care is present.	A discussion of leadership skills, theories, and styles to employ for collaboration on interprofessional teams participating in the legislative process and providing evidence-based, patient-centered care is clearly provided and well developed.	A comprehensive discussion of leadership skills, theories, and styles to employ for collaboration on interprofessional teams participating in the legislative process and providing evidence-based, patient-centered care is thoroughly developed with supporting details.
Required Sources	5.0%	Sources are not included.	Number of required sources is only partially met.	Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.	Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.	Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Organization and Effectiveness	20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose	7.0%	Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.	Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.	Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.	Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.	Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Argument Logic and Construction	8.0%	Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.	Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.	Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.	Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.	Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	5.0%	Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.	Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.	Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.	Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.	Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Format	10.0%
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)	5.0%	Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.	Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.	Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.	Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.	All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	5.0%	Sources are not documented.	Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Total Weightage	100%

https://onlinenursingowl.com/2022/02/03/benchmark-electronic-health-record-implementation-paper/

NEED HELP WITH YOUR NURSING ASSIGNMENTS ?

We are dedicated to delivering high quality nursing papers that adhere to the provided instructions, are adequately referenced with the latest scholarly knowledge,

Timely Delivery

Respecting your time and needs, we complete and deliver your orders within the specified timeframe.

Highly skilled writers

We employ experienced and qualified PhD and MD writers able to deal with any types of academic papers

100% unique content

Thorough research and the best academic writing practices ensure complete originality and high quality of every paper we deliver.

Order Now Login

Benchmark – Electronic Health Record Implementation Paper