Assessment 2 Human Sexuality Case Study

PSYC FPX 2800 Assessment 2 Human Sexuality Case Study

Assessment 2 Human Sexuality Case Study

Name

Capella University

PSYC FPX 2800 Introduction to Human Sexuality

Prof. Name

Date

Introduction – Patricia and Ira

Finding a life partner can be challenging for everyone, as is finding sexual satisfaction within a relationship. This journey often involves various strategies to maintain a healthy sexual connection. Evolutionary Psychology suggests that men and women employ different strategies to preserve and nurture relationships, leading to conflicts stemming from gender differences. The case study of Patricia and Ira exemplifies these dynamics.

Evolutionary Psychology

Evolutionary Psychology, the scientific exploration of human behaviors and thoughts in the context of evolutionary goals like reproduction, underscores the differences in how men and women select partners. Men, biologically driven to seek sexually appealing partners, focus on short-term mating strategies, while women, capable of pregnancy and childbirth, seek partners who can provide support for themselves and their offspring. These gender-based differences shape the selection process for partners, reflecting diverse life goals (Kelly, 2014).

Research indicates that men and women utilize distinct strategies to fulfill their relationship goals. These strategies can be categorized into long-term, focused on marriage and parenting, and short-term, emphasizing genetic compatibility. While both genders may employ both strategies, men tend to lean towards short-term mating, while women prioritize long-term investment due to the differing reproductive costs and benefits (Sefcek et al., 2007).

Studies have shown that women employing short-term mating strategies are still able to select mates and reproduce, especially in challenging circumstances like disease or conflict. Conversely, men employing long-term strategies tend to attract higher quality partners, enhancing the overall fitness of their offspring (Kruger, Fisher, & Jobling, 2003).

Case Study

Analyzing the case study of Patricia and Ira through an evolutionary psychology lens elucidates their relationship dynamics. Patricia’s desire to move in together signifies a transition from a short-term to a long-term relationship, emphasizing commitment and shared expenses. However, Ira’s reluctance suggests a preference for the status quo, indicating a misalignment in long-term goals. This disparity may lead Patricia to reassess Ira’s suitability as a long-term partner, potentially ending the relationship or accepting its short-term nature (Sefcek et al., 2007).

PSYC FPX 2800 Assessment 2 Human Sexuality Case Study

Ethical Standards

Addressing the ethical considerations in providing relationship therapy to couples like Patricia and Ira requires adherence to confidentiality guidelines outlined by the APA. Therapists must establish clear boundaries regarding client confidentiality, especially when counseling couples. Confidentiality agreements should be maintained unless both parties consent to share information, ensuring equitable treatment and trust-building within the therapeutic relationship (Pukay-Martin, 2008).

Conclusion

Understanding the evolutionary underpinnings of mate selection and relationship dynamics can help couples navigate conflicts and strengthen their bond. Acknowledging gender-based differences and ethical considerations is essential for therapists assisting couples in resolving conflicts and fostering healthier relationships.

References

Kelly, G. (2014.) Sexuality Today. New York, NY Pukay-Martin, D.(2008.) Ethical Considerations in Working With Couples: Confidentiality

within the couple. Retrieved from http://www.nationalregistr.org/pub/the-national-report- pub/the-register-report-fall-2008/ethical-considerations

Sefcek, J., Brumbach, B., Vasquez, G., & Miller, F. (2007.) The Evolutionary Psychology of Human Mate Choice: how ecology, genes, and fertility influences mating behavior. University of Arizona, Department of Psychology. Retrieved from http://www.unm.edu/edu~gfmiller/new_papers/sefcek%20mill.pdf

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS – PSYC FPX 2800 Assessment 2 Human Sexuality Case Study

Who we are

We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched for a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help with your coursework.

Do you handle any type of coursework?

Yes. We have posted our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication.

Is it hard to Place an Order?

  • 1. Click on “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
  • 2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
  • 3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
  • 4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
  • 5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – PSYC FPX 2800 Assessment 2 Human Sexuality Case Study

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. PSYC FPX 2800 Assessment 2 Human Sexuality Case Study

  • Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

  • Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. PSYC FPX 2800 Assessment 2 Human Sexuality Case Study

  • APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

  • Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

  • LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

  • Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

  • Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

  • GuaranteePSYC FPX 2800 Assessment 2 Human Sexuality Case Study

  • Zero Plagiarism
  • On-time delivery
  • A-Grade Papers
  • Free Revision
  • 24/7 Support
  • 100% Confidentiality
  • Professional Writers

  • Services Offered

  • Custom paper writing
  • Question and answers
  • Essay paper writing
  • Editing and proofreading
  • Plagiarism removal services
  • Multiple answer questions

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS PSYC FPX 2800 Assessment 2 Human Sexuality Case Study

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

NEED HELP WITH YOUR NURSING ASSIGNMENTS ?

We are dedicated to delivering high quality nursing papers that adhere to the provided instructions, are adequately referenced with the latest scholarly knowledge,

Timely Delivery

Respecting your time and needs, we complete and deliver your orders within the specified timeframe.

Highly skilled writers

We employ experienced and qualified PhD and MD writers able to deal with any types of academic papers

100% unique content

Thorough research and the best academic writing practices ensure complete originality and high quality of every paper we deliver.

Order Now