NUR 308 Assignment 2 Literature Search & Evidence Appraisal

Assignment 2 Literature Search & Evidence Appraisal

NUR 308 Assignment 2 Literature Search & Evidence Appraisal

Objective
To gain proficiency in performing a literature search, documenting the search strategy, selecting relevant articles, and critically appraising quantitative and qualitative research studies. 

Instructions

1. Topic Selection and Literature Search

 Revisit your PICO question from the week one– consider making any tweaks or adjustments that were suggested by the faculty and/or other students. Refine the question until you are happy with it.

Next, using the worksheets posted as a guide, formulate a search strategy and use academic databases such as PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar. As you conduct the search, be sure to record the search strategy, including:

• Keywords used
• Date(s) of search
• Databases searched
• Inclusion and exclusion criteria
• Number of articles retrieved

1. Select Articles

After conducting a thorough search, choose five peer-reviewed PRIMARY* research articles that are directly relevant to your PICO question. Ensure that your selection includes at least one QUANTitative study and one QUALitative study. All articles must be published in a peer reviewed journal and should be published within the last 5 years.

*Review the course content to be sure you understand what is and is not a primary research article

1. Prepare an Evidence Table

Next, fully complete the evidence table for each of the five articles you choose (see attached). Incomplete tables will be scored accordingly – be sure to complete all aspects of the table for complete points.

1. Critique One QUANTitative Article

Choose ONE quantitative article. Then, critically appraise the study based on:

1. • • Research Question/Hypothesis/Purpose: Clarity and relevance
     • Study Design: Appropriateness for the research question
     • Sample: Selection process, size, and representativeness
     • Ethical Considerations
     • Data Collection Methods: Validity and reliability of tools used
     • Data Analysis: Appropriateness and rigor
     • Results: Interpretation and significance of findings
     • Limitations: Any biases or limitations and their impact on the study’s outcome
     • Implications: The study’s contributions to nursing practice and future research needs

1. Critique One QUALitative Article

Choose ONE qualitative article. Then, critically appraise the study based on:

1. Critically appraise the selected qualitative study based on:
   1. Research Question/Purpose: Clarity and relevance
   2. Study Design: Appropriateness for the research question
   3. Sample: Selection process, size, and adequacy for qualitative research
   4. Data Collection Methods: Appropriateness and credibility of methods used (e.g., interviews, focus groups, observations)
   5. Data Analysis: Process used to ensure rigor (coding, theme generation)
   6. Results: Richness and depth of findings
   7. Limitations: Any biases or limitations and their impact on the study’s outcome
   8. Implications: The study’s contributions to nursing practice and future research needs

1. Paper Submission Requirements

After completing each of the steps above, you will combine your findings into a 5-6 page paper (using APA 7^th edition for formatting and citations). The paper should contain the following components:

• Introduction (1/2 page)
  • Provide background information about the topic you chose and link this to your PICO question
• Documentation of the literature search strategy (1 pages)
  • Describe your search strategy in detail using the key part above
• Two separate write-ups: one for the critique of the quantitative article and one for the qualitative article (1-2 pages each)
  • Review the worksheet you completed for each article – then discuss this information in the body of the paper as it relates to your question
• Compare and Analyze the Articles (1 page)
  • Compare the two articles you chose – did they have similar or different findings? Were the strengths and weaknesses similar or different?
• Conclusion (1 page)
  • Summarize the findings from both articles and connect the findings – did they help to answer your PICO question? Do you need additional information? Will you change your search strategy moving forward? Can you make any suggestions with this information, or do you need more?
• Include and submit the completed evidence table of the five selected articles
• Reference Page (APA Format) 

Evaluation Criteria

Introduction and PICO Question (5 points)

Introduction is clear, concise, and provides strong background information. The PICO question is well-defined and relevant (5 points)

Documentation of Literature Search Strategy (10 points)

Search strategy is thoroughly documented, including all keywords, dates, databases, inclusion/exclusion criteria, and the number of articles retrieved

(10 points)

Selection of Articles (15 points)

Chosen articles are highly relevant to the PICO question, include both quantitative and qualitative studies, and are diverse. (15 points)

Critique of Quantitative Article (20 points)

Thorough and critical appraisal of the qualitative article, addressing all specified criteria in detail

(20 points)

Critique of Qualitative Article (20 points)

Thorough and critical appraisal of the qualitative article, addressing all specified criteria in detail

(20 points)

Comparison and Analysis of Articles (5 points)

Comprehensive comparison and analysis, clearly identifying similarities, differences, strengths, and weaknesses

(5 points)

Conclusion (10 points)

Conclusion effectively summarizes findings, connects them to the PICO question, identifies needs for further research, and provides actionable suggestions (10 points)

Evidence Table (15 points)

Evidence table is complete, accurate, and includes all necessary details for all five articles (15 points)

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS – NUR 308 Assignment 2 Literature Search & Evidence Appraisal

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – NUR 308 Assignment 2 Literature Search & Evidence Appraisal

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. NUR 308 Assignment 2 Literature Search & Evidence Appraisal

• Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

• Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

• APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

• Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

• LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. NUR 308 Assignment 2 Literature Search & Evidence Appraisal

• Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

• Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours. NUR 308 Assignment 2 Literature Search & Evidence Appraisal

• Guarantee

• Zero Plagiarism
• On-time delivery
• A-Grade Papers
• Free Revision
• 24/7 Support
• 100% Confidentiality
• Professional Writers

• Services Offered

• Custom paper writing
• Question and answers
• Essay paper writing
• Editing and proofreading
• Plagiarism removal services
• Multiple answer questions

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. NUR 308 Assignment 2 Literature Search & Evidence Appraisal

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper