BUS 4068 Unit 5 Assignment 2 Interviewing Methods for Evidence Gathering

BUS 4068 Unit 5 Assignment 2 Interviewing Methods for Evidence Gathering

BUS 4068 Unit 5 Assignment 2 Interviewing Methods for Evidence Gathering

54.

As a component of the groundwork for acquainting with the principal suspect before his meeting, i.e., Johnie, the extortion examiner, should be knowledgeable about his workforce record, including subtleties like his:

Date of joining. His current and previous job roles’ functions and responsibilities. He received monetary and non-monetary compensation and a comparison to industry standards. Trend of growth Missed advancements were inciting sharpness (if any). The employee’s financial situation, including debt. Age, marital status, the standard of living (whether or not they are living beyond their means), and reputation within the organization and among peers are all factors to consider.

2.

Typically, non-suspects are asked three questions: introductory in nature, information-seeking, and question-and-answer-based. The reason for posing finishing up and unassuming inquiries is to acquire new or extra data. 

Bus 4068 Unit 5 Assignment 2 Interviewing Methods for Evidence Gathering

This may bring further useful, pertinent information they may have omitted in their responses to the interviewer. Coworkers are frequently aware of process inconsistencies if not the actual fraud, and even the tiniest clues are crucial in a fraud investigation. In the given case, the above technique might be taken on to ask unconditional, general, and indisputable inquiries to Donna and Alen about their relationship with Johnie. 

Culture and interaction with other purchasing department members, their performance evaluation process, the department’s Standard Operating Procedures and any deviations from them, any unusual transactions, events, or behaviors they may have observed, etc.

3.

Johnie’s interview preparation will include looking over and evaluating the following documents:

Faculty documents of Johnie as well as his colleagues. The Johnie CV. If it’s available, the report from the background check at the time of hiring. Organization’s Standard Working Method in the obtainment office. 

Bus 4068 Unit 5 Assignment 2 Interviewing Methods for Evidence Gathering

IT and Information Security measures, overriding controls, and in place internal controls The organization’s employee hierarchy, particularly in Johnie’s department. The powers, duties, and responsibilities of every employee in the purchasing department. Johnie’s activities on social media sites.

Interviewing techniques for gathering evidence Public records like real estate and court records, UCC filings, Audit of the Undertaking Asset The board (ERP) or bookkeeping framework. Survey the past monetary records, including the assertion of benefit and misfortune, Articulation of financial position, Explanation of Incomes, and so forth. The company’s bank statements and payroll records

Regardless of their level of direct awareness of the fraud, most small or medium-sized business coworkers are generally aware of at least some aspects of it, if not personally involved. Since the buying office time is usually little and Johnie straightforwardly administers them, they may be conscious of numerous perplexing insights regarding Johnie. 

Including his habits, patterns of behavior, thinking style, incentives, workplace dissatisfaction, social life, family pressures, financial situation, and other factors, because of their regular interactions with him daily. Understanding Johnie, the principal suspect, and the nature of fraud itself will benefit from this information.

55.

  1. Victoria should request a copy of the Standard Operating Procedure from management. She must determine who is accountable if management directives do not follow the SOP. She knows whether everyone is complicit or not because of this.
  2. The purchases, inventory, and sales accounting records are the evidence Victoria should consider using to see if her suspicions about “Easy” are true. These three general ledgers will demonstrate that the business is moving in the right direction. Even though inventory turnover and purchases are high, receivables collection does not coincide with anticipated sales. There is a more prominent likelihood that deals should be recorded as expected.

    Bus 4068 Unit 5 Assignment 2 Interviewing Methods for Evidence Gathering

Intrigue between the bookkeeper, gathering, and salesman, and it is obvious to advertise individual. Furthermore, Easy’s primary responsibility is to ensure that SOP has always been in place because she is the manager. Even though Edsel has handled the collection and billing, Easy can still monitor things. 

She must establish a rule requiring approval before a document or inventory leaves the property. Since the company is small and still attempting to establish itself in the market, Easy must be available for everything. It is much more direct if Simple embraces bookkeeping programming to get to the record from a distance. By then, she knows the inventory, sales, and collection developments.

Easy can check to see if the deadline for collecting receivables has been met. She can also easily see the turnover of the company’s inventory, the prices of the goods it typically purchases, the suppliers’ names, credit terms, and the limit they gave to Go Fast & Play Hard. 

Besides that, Simple can likewise screen the smash hit and quick merchandise to boost the potential for the organization’s deals and stop the things that are not performing well. Easy is responsible and accountable for the business’s outcome as a manager. As a result, to keep the company from going out of business, she needs to be able to set up internal control from the beginning. Bus 4068 Unit 5 Assignment 2 Interviewing Methods for Evidence Gathering

  1. Indeed, she ought to meet with Theresa, Andre, and Patrick to verify that their obligations, delegated to them by the organization, have been finished and as per the organization’s standard working strategies.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Who We Are 

We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched for a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help with your coursework.

Do you handle any type of coursework?

Yes. We have posted our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication.

Is it hard to Place an Order?

  • 1. Click on “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
  • 2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
  • 3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
  • 4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
  • 5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – 

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

  • Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

  • Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

  • APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

  • Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

  • LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

  • Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading. Assignment 2 Interviewing Methods for Evidence Gathering

  • Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours. Assignment 2 Interviewing Methods for Evidence Gathering

  • GuaranteeAssignment 2 Interviewing Methods for Evidence Gathering

  • Zero Plagiarism
  • On-time delivery
  • A-Grade Papers
  • Free Revision
  • 24/7 Support
  • 100% Confidentiality
  • Professional Writers

  • Services Offered

  • Custom paper writing
  • Question and answers
  • Essay paper writing
  • Editing and proofreading
  • Plagiarism removal services
  • Multiple answer questions

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, affordable, plagiarism-free paper

NEED HELP WITH YOUR NURSING ASSIGNMENTS ?

We are dedicated to delivering high quality nursing papers that adhere to the provided instructions, are adequately referenced with the latest scholarly knowledge,

Timely Delivery

Respecting your time and needs, we complete and deliver your orders within the specified timeframe.

Highly skilled writers

We employ experienced and qualified PhD and MD writers able to deal with any types of academic papers

100% unique content

Thorough research and the best academic writing practices ensure complete originality and high quality of every paper we deliver.

Order Now