CNA152: Health Assessment Clinical Reasoning

CNA152: Health Assessment Clinical Reasoning Report Discussion

CNA152: Health Assessment Clinical Reasoning

CNA152: Health Assessment Clinical Reasoning Report

Topic: Patient Scenario

Task: Research Paper

Reference: Harvard Referencing

Duration: 12 Hours!

Minimum Reference Count: 4

Task Description

This task requires you to submit a written report that demonstrates your ability to apply selected phases of the clinical reasoning process, at an introductory level, to your assigned patient scenario from Assessment. further details are provided in the attachment. Stick to the marking rubric to avoid coillition with the instructions. Clinical Reasoning Report Discussion

Regards

CNA152: Health Assessment 1 Assessment Task 2B – Clinical reasoning report

Objective/Criteria Performance Indicators HD DN CR PP NN

1. Consider the patient situation and collect cues/information • Demonstrate a

beginner’s level understanding and application of clinical reasoning cycle.

5 marks

• Forms an initial impression about what might be occurring at the time.

• Correctly determines all cues that are relevant to collect from the patient scenario.

• Differentiates between subjective and objective cues.

• Correctly identifies all subjective and objective cues.

• Forms an initial impression about what might be occurring at the time.

• Determines most cues that are relevant to collect from the patient scenario.

• Correctly identifies most subjective and objective cues.

• Forms an initial impression about what might be occurring at the time.

• Determines many cues which are relevant to collect from the patient scenario.

• Correctly identifies many subjective and objective cues.

• Forms an initial impression about what might be occurring at the time.

• Determines some cues that are relevant to collect from the patient scenario.

• Correctly identifies some subjective and objective cues.

• Does not develop an initial impression of the person in the case.

• Lists cues provided in the case but cannot determine which cues are relevant to collect from the patient scenario.

• Does not identify or incorrectly identifies subjective and objective cues.

2. Process information • Demonstrate a

beginner’s level understanding and application of clinical reasoning cycle, and

• able to apply relevant knowledge to demonstrate a clear understanding of the assessment findings in relation to the patient’s context.

20 marks

• Identifies all relevant normal and abnormal cues.

• Analyses the cues that have been collected.

• Narrows down all the important information about the cues collected.

• Demonstrates an outstanding understanding of the assessment findings and patient’s condition in relation to the principles of anatomy and physiology.

• Compares the current situation to the previous situation including patient’s past history.

• Forms a logical opinion about what the patient is experiencing.

• Identifies all relevant normal and abnormal cues.

• Analyses some of the cues that have been collected.

• Narrows down most of the important information about the cues collected.

• Demonstrates an understanding of the assessment findings and patient’s condition in relation to the principles of anatomy and physiology.

• Compares the current situation to the previous situation.

• Forms a logical opinion about what the patient is experiencing.

• Identifies most normal and abnormal cues.

• Narrows down some important information about the cues collected.

• Demonstrates some understanding of the assessment findings in relation to the principles of anatomy and physiology.

• Compares the current situation to the previous situation.

• Attempts to form a logical opinion about what the patient is experiencing.

• Identifies some normal and abnormal cues.

• Demonstrates a limited understanding of the assessment findings in relation to the principles of anatomy and physiology.

• Some attempt at comparing the current situation to the previous situation.

• Forms a limited logical opinion about what the patient is experiencing.

• Does not identify normal or abnormal cues.

• Narrowing down of important cues has not occurred.

• Does not demonstrate an understanding of the assessment findings in relation to the principles of anatomy and physiology.

• No comparison of the current or previous situation.

• No logical opinion is formed.

CNA152: Health Assessment 1 Assessment Task 2B – Clinical reasoning report

3. Critically reflect, at a beginner’s level, on your skills performance, using scholarly sources to support your reflection. 10 marks

• Demonstrates comprehensive reflection and insight.

• Identifies one strength during the skills assessment and briefly explains why this promotes a positive patient outcome.

• Identifies one aspect of your practice for improvement and explains: a) what you should do differently next time, and b) why this is important for promoting a positive patient outcome.

• Outlines one course of action for improving this aspect of your practice with relevant connections to the current literature.

• Demonstrates solid reflection and insight throughout.

• Identifies one strength during the skills assessment and briefly explains why this promotes a positive patient outcome.

• Identifies one aspect of your practice for improvement and explains: a) what you should do differently next time, and b) why this is important for promoting a positive patient outcome.

• Outlines one course of action for improving this aspect of your practice with some connections to the current literature. Clinical Reasoning Report Discussion

• Demonstrates some reflection and insight throughout.

• Identifies one strength during the skills assessment and briefly explains why this promotes a positive patient outcome.

• Identifies one aspect of your practice for improvement and explains what you should do differently next time.

• Outlines one course of action for improving this aspect of your practice with limited connections to the current literature.

• The reflection is mostly a description of the learning experience but some attempt to provide justification for events or actions which have happened.

• Identifies one strength during the skills assessment and briefly explains why this promotes a positive patient outcome.

• Identifies one aspect of your practice for improvement and briefly explains what you should do differently next time.

• Outlines one course of action for improving this aspect of your practice.

• The reflection provides a description of the skills performance only.

• The reflection does not identify any actions or identifies irrelevant actions to improve the situation (the practical skills).

4. Writes in a structured, succinct and well informed manner with references to appropriate academic literature, current research and evidence- based clinical practice guidelines. Using correct Harvard referencing style 5 marks

• A high level of academic writing with strong evidence of planning.

• The paper is exceptionally logical, insightful and balanced and is consistently expressed in a clear and fluent manner.

• Accurately references all sources using the Harvard style.

• Academic writing with strong evidence of planning.

• The paper is logical and balanced and expressed in a clear and fluent manner.

• Accurately references the majority sources using the Harvard style

• Academic writing with clear evidence of planning with a logical flow.

• Discussion is generally expressed in a clear and fluent manner.

• Accurately references the majority sources using the Harvard style.

• Academic writing using coherent and partly cohesive expression.

• Semi-structured using some academic literature to support the paper.

• Accurately references most sources using the Harvard style.

• Multiple punctuation, sentence structure and formatting errors which impact on readability.

• Non-academic sources are utilised. • Inaccurate referencing style or

does not use the Harvard style. • Uses few or no references to

support work.

Assessment Task 2B: Clinical reasoning report

Task

Description

This assessment task requires you to submit a written report (1000words) that demonstrates your ability to apply selected phases of the clinical reasoning process, at an introductory level, to your assigned patient scenario from Assessment Task 2A:

 

1. Provide a brief summary of your assigned patient scenario.

This section relates to the ‘Consider the patient situation’ phase of

the clinical reasoning cycle.

 

2. List the objective and subjective data that you have collected from

reviewing the patient scenario information provided.

This section relates to the ‘Collect cues/information’ phase of the

clinical reasoning cycle.

 

3. Analyse and interpret your patient’s vital signs data and explain

the significance of the information in this patient’s context.

This section relates to the ‘Process information’ phase of the clinical

reasoning cycle.

 

4. Critically reflect on your clinical skills to gather vital signs data

(Assessment Task 2A).

This section relates to the ‘Reflect on process and new learning’

phase of the clinical reasoning cycle.

 

You should take the peer-review feedback from your partner into

account when you prepare for writing this section of the report and

upload the feedback form into the Assignments folder.

· Identify one strength (something you did well) during the skills

assessment and briefly explain why this promotes a positive

patient outcome.

· Identify one aspect of your practice for improvement

(something you did not do so well or did not do at all during the

skills assessment). Briefly explain what you should do differently

next time and why this is important for promoting a positive

patient outcome. Outline at least one course of action (what

further learning do you need to do) for improving this aspect of

your practice.

 

Sections 1, 2 & 3 (consider the patient situation, collect cues and

information, and process the information) should be approximately

700 words. Section 4 (critical reflection on the vital signs skills

assessment) should be approximately 300 words.

 

You will need to use relevant scholarly sources of information

(textbooks, journal articles, evidence-based practice guidelines or

clinical care standards) to support your analysis of your patient’s

health information and critical reflection. The Harvard referencing

style should be used for citation of information sources throughout

the text (in-text referencing) and a reference list at the end of the

report.

CNA152 Assessment Task 2B: Clinical Reasoning Report

Patient 2 Miss Lucy Wu, 20 years old, presented to a medical centre with pneumonia. Her skin looks very dry and pale. You have been assigned to look after her with a registered nurse this morning. At 0700 hrs, you received a handover from the night duty staff. Patient profile A 20-year-old Chinese female Chief complaint ‘I feel very tired and have chest pain when I cough. I don’t feel

like eating and drinking.’ Present health Patient states she is usually well. She has a history of

hypertension and is on medication. Her normal blood pressure (BP) is 140/80mmHg (on medical treatment). She returned to Launceston from Shanghai, China a few days ago. She started to feel generally unwell and fatigued since she returned to Launceston. She reported she had a few episodes of vomiting and shaking chills overnight. At 0400 hours, she felt the urge to use the bathroom. She said she felt generally unwell and shaking chills as soon as she got out of bed. She reported she felt very sick in her stomach and vomited a large volume of greenish-yellow fluid in the bathroom. Her flatmate called 000 and took her to the emergency department. Clinical Reasoning Report Discussion

Past medical history Medical history Hypertension for 2 years (on medication and under control),

tuberculosis 10 years ago and hay fever. Allergies She states she is allergic to aspirin and she comes out in hives. Social history Alcohol use Enjoys 1 to 2 standard drinks every night, usually drinks white

wine. Tobacco use Has never smoked. Domestic and intimate partner

She is single and an overseas student. She has a cousin who is also an overseas student in Sydney. Her parents live in Shanghai, China.

Work environment She is a second-year Bachelor of Business student in the University of Tasmania.

Home environment She lives in the Inveresk apartments. Religion Nil

CNA152 Assessment Task 2B: Clinical Reasoning Report

Patient 2 At 0600hrs, Miss Wu’s vital signs in the emergency department were: Blood Pressure 130/80 mmHg Pulse 110 beats/minute Temperature 39ºC Respiratory rate 24 breaths/minute

Now, the time is 0730 hours. Your mentor (the registered nurse) asks you to take a set of Miss Wu’s vital signs and the results are: Blood Pressure 140/70 mmHg Pulse 70 beats/minute Temperature 37.5ºC Respiratory rate 16 breaths/minute

Before you leave her room, Miss Wu tells you her T-shirt is soaked in sweat.

https://onlinenursingowl.com/2022/04/04/clinical-reasoning-report-discussion/

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Who we are

We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched for a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help with your coursework.

Do you handle any type of coursework?

Yes. We have posted our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication.

Is it hard to Place an Order?

  • 1. Click on “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
  • 2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
  • 3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
  • 4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
  • 5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – CNA152: Health Assessment Clinical Reasoning Report Discussion

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. CNA152: Health Assessment Clinical Reasoning Report Discussion

  • Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

  • Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. CNA152: Health Assessment Clinical Reasoning Report Discussion

  • APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

  • Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

  • LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

  • Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

  • Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours. CNA152: Health Assessment Clinical Reasoning Report Discussion

  • GuaranteeCNA152: Health Assessment Clinical Reasoning Report Discussion

  • Zero Plagiarism
  • On-time delivery
  • A-Grade Papers
  • Free Revision
  • 24/7 Support
  • 100% Confidentiality
  • Professional Writers

  • Services Offered

  • Custom paper writing
  • Question and answers
  • Essay paper writing
  • Editing and proofreading
  • Plagiarism removal services
  • Multiple answer questions

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. CNA152: Health Assessment Clinical Reasoning Report Discussion

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

NEED HELP WITH YOUR NURSING ASSIGNMENTS ?

We are dedicated to delivering high quality nursing papers that adhere to the provided instructions, are adequately referenced with the latest scholarly knowledge,

Timely Delivery

Respecting your time and needs, we complete and deliver your orders within the specified timeframe.

Highly skilled writers

We employ experienced and qualified PhD and MD writers able to deal with any types of academic papers

100% unique content

Thorough research and the best academic writing practices ensure complete originality and high quality of every paper we deliver.

Order Now