Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

 Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

Controversy Associated With Dissociative Disorders

The DSM-5 is a diagnostic tool. It has evolved over the decades, as have the classifications and criteria within its pages. It is used not just for diagnosis, however, but also for billing, access to services, and legal cases. Not all practitioners are in agreement with the content and structure of the DSM-5, and dissociative disorders are one such area. These disorders can be difficult to distinguish and diagnose. There is also controversy in the field over the legitimacy of certain dissociative disorders, such as dissociative identity disorder, which was formerly called multiple personality disorder.

In this Assignment, you will examine the controversy surrounding dissociative disorders. You will also explore clinical, ethical, and legal considerations pertinent to working with patients with these disorders.

To Prepare

• Review this week’s Learning Resources on dissociative disorders.
• Use the Walden Library to investigate the controversy regarding dissociative disorders. Locate at least three scholarly articles that you can use to support your Assignment.

The Assignment (2–3 pages)

• Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.
• Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.
• Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.
• Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.
  Rubric Detail

  Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

  Content

  Name: NRNP_6665_Week9_Assignment_Rubric

  	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
  In 2–3 pages, address the following: • Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.	Points: Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) The response includes an accurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 11 (11%) – 11 (11%) The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 10 (10%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. Or the response is missing. Feedback:
  • Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.	Points: Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The response includes a thorough and well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale demonstrates critical thinking and is strongly supported with three scholarly references. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The response includes a well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is clear and appropriately supported with three scholarly references. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The response includes a somewhat vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is somewhat unclear and references either provide weak support for the rationale or are not scholarly/current. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The response includes a vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is unclear and references are inappropriate. Or the response is missing. Feedback:
  • Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.	Points: Points Range: 27 (27%) – 30 (30%) The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 24 (24%) – 26 (26%) The response includes an accurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23 (23%) The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20 (20%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. Or the response is missing. Feedback:
  • Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.	Points: Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) The response includes an accurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 11 (11%) – 11 (11%) The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 10 (10%) The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Or, response is missing. Feedback:
  Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.	Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. Feedback:
  Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation	Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains three or four grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding Feedback:
  Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.	Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains one or two APA format errors Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains three or four APA format errors Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (five or more) APA format errors Feedback:

  Show Descriptions Show Feedback

  In 2–3 pages, address the following: • Explain the controversy that surrounds dissociative disorders.–

  Levels of Achievement: Excellent 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. Good 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) The response includes an accurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. Fair 11 (11%) – 11 (11%) The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. Poor 0 (0%) – 10 (10%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to dissociative disorders. Or the response is missing. Feedback:

  • Explain your professional beliefs about dissociative disorders, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.–

  Levels of Achievement: Excellent 23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The response includes a thorough and well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale demonstrates critical thinking and is strongly supported with three scholarly references. Good 20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The response includes a well-organized explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is clear and appropriately supported with three scholarly references. Fair 18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The response includes a somewhat vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is somewhat unclear and references either provide weak support for the rationale or are not scholarly/current. Poor 0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The response includes a vague explanation of the student’s professional beliefs about dissociative disorders. Rationale is unclear and references are inappropriate. Or the response is missing. Feedback:

  • Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder.–

  Levels of Achievement: Excellent 27 (27%) – 30 (30%) The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. Good 24 (24%) – 26 (26%) The response includes an accurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. Fair 21 (21%) – 23 (23%) The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. Poor 0 (0%) – 20 (20%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with a dissociative disorder. Or the response is missing. Feedback:

  • Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.–

  Levels of Achievement: Excellent 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Good 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) The response includes an accurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Fair 11 (11%) – 11 (11%) The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Poor 0 (0%) – 10 (10%) The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to dissociative disorders that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Or, response is missing. Feedback:

  Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.–

  Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. Feedback:

  Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation–

  Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains three or four grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding Feedback:

  Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.–

  Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains one or two APA format errors Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains three or four APA format errors Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (five or more) APA format errors Feedback:

  Total Points: 100

  Name: NRNP_6665_Week9_Assignment_Rubric

  ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS

  Order Yours TodayOrder Different PaperUrgent Paper / EssayCheck Paper Cost (s)

  WhatsApp

  Your assignment woes end here!

  Who We Are
  We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched for a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework.

  Do you handle any type of coursework?

  Yes. We have posted over our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication.

  

  Is it hard to Place an Order?

  ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT

  1. Click on the  “Order Now” on the Main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.

  2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.

  3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.

  4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.

  100% Reliable Site. Make this your Home of Academic Papers.

  ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

  Who We Are 

  We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched for a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help with your coursework.

  Do you handle any type of coursework?

  Yes. We have posted our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication.

  Is it hard to Place an Order?

  • 1. Click on “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
  • 2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
  • 3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
  • 4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
  • 5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.

  SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – 

  We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

  • Discussion Questions (DQ)

  Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

  • Weekly Participation

  Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

  • APA Format and Writing Quality

  Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

  • Use of Direct Quotes

  I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

  • LopesWrite Policy

  For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

  • Late Policy

  The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

  • Communication

  Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

  • Guarantee

  • Zero Plagiarism
  • On-time delivery
  • A-Grade Papers
  • Free Revision
  • 24/7 Support
  • 100% Confidentiality
  • Professional Writers

  • Services Offered

  • Custom paper writing
  • Question and answers
  • Essay paper writing
  • Editing and proofreading
  • Plagiarism removal services
  • Multiple answer questions

  SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS

  We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

  Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper