Final Project Part II: Evaluate a Quantitative Study

Final Project Part II: Evaluate a Quantitative Study

Final Project Part II: Evaluate a Quantitative Study

For Part II of your final project, you will comprehensively evaluate an article of your choice that reports on a quantitative study. (Remember, a quantitative study uses numbers as data.) Locate an article in the professional literature that addresses a topic you are interested in. Remember to use the Area of Interest interactive (Links to an external site.) to guide you in the selection process. The article you select should describe a quantitative study and should have all or most of the expected sections, either with their own headings or embedded in the article: Introduction, Literature Review, Methods, Results, and Discussion. Final Project Part II: Evaluate a Quantitative Study

ORDER NOW FOR COMPREHENSIVE, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS

In writing your evaluation of the article, you will use Section 5.7 in your text. Do not simply tell what is in the article, but evaluate it using the questions in your text. Explain and justify your evaluation based on specific examples from the article.

Your paper should be 2100-2800 words in length (not counting the title, abstract, and reference pages) and comprehensively evaluate an article of a quantitative study. Use proper APA formatting and good writing and organization in your evaluation paper.

The following questions may help you in evaluating your articles, though you do not have to follow this format exactly.

  1. Evaluate the Introduction and Literature Review.
    • Do the researchers present an adequate rationale for conducting the study? Explain.
    • What is the significance of the study?  What difference will it make to the field?
    • Is the literature review thorough and comprehensive?
    • Do the researchers demonstrate any potential biases in the literature review?
    • Are all-important concepts clearly defined by the researchers?
    • Do the researchers clearly describe previous methods that are relevant to understanding the purpose for conducting this study?
  2. Evaluate the Purpose Statement and Hypothesis.
    • Does the article clearly state the purpose statement?
    • What is the purpose statement as expressed in the article?
    • Is the purpose statement clearly based on the argument developed in the literature review?
    • Are the variables of interest (i.e. independent and dependent) clearly identified in the purpose statement?
    • What type of hypothesis is presented (alternative nondirectional, alternative directional, or null hypothesis)?
    • Do the investigators provide a clear rationale for the direction of their hypothesis, based on the literature review?
    • Is the hypothesis testable and falsifiable?
    • Is the hypothesis stated with brevity and clarity?
  3. Evaluate the Methods Section.
    • What type of sampling method is used?  Is that appropriate?
    • Are relevant demographic characteristics of the sample clearly identified?
    • Do the methods of sample selection used by the researchers provide a good representative sample, based on the population?
    • Are there any apparent biases in selection of the sample?
    • Is the sample size large enough for the study proposed?
    • Is a particular quantitative research design used (e.g. true experimental, quasi-experimental, etc.)? If so, what is it?
    • Is the research design consistent with the purpose and hypothesis presented in the introduction?
    • Are the independent variables clearly defined so that they can be replicated using the information provided in the procedures section?
    • What are some of the potential threats to internal validity?  How are they threats?
    • What are some of the potential threats to external validity?  How are they threats?
    • Is there a clear and adequate description of the instrument (data collection measures) used?
    • What types of measures were used in the study (direct observation, behavioral measures, self-report, etc.)?
    • What are some of the potential problems or limitations with the types of measures used?
    • To what extent are the instruments standardized, and what types of standardized scoring were used?
    • Does the instrument appear to be appropriate for the sample? Final Project Part II: Evaluate a Quantitative Study
    • Is the reliability of the instrument reported?  Is the reliability adequate?
    • What types of validity are reported for the instrument used?  Is the validity adequate?
  4. Evaluate the Results Section.
    • What descriptive statistics were used?  Do the researchers adequately describe the sample?
    • What types of inferential statistics were used? Are the inferential statistics used adequate to answer the research hypotheses or questions?
    • Is the analysis method clearly described?
  5. Evaluate the Discussion Section.
    • Do the researchers clearly restate the purpose and research questions?
    • Do the researchers clearly discuss the implications of the findings and how they relate to theories, other findings, and actual practice?
    • Do the researchers identify potential limitations of the study and the results?
    • Do the researchers identify possible directions for future research?
  6. Remaining Questions.
    • What aspects of quantitative methods do you still find challenging?
    • Was there any information in the above list that you were not able to find in the article you chose?

In addition to your 2100-2800 word paper, upload a PDF copy of the article to the Dropbox.

Finalpaper5.7.docx

· Do the researchers present an adequate rationale for conducting the study?

· What is the significance of the study? What difference will it make to the field?

· Is the literature review thorough and comprehensive?

· Do the researchers demonstrate any potential biases in the literature review?

· Are all important concepts clearly defined by the researchers?

· Do the researchers clearly describe previous methods that are relevant to understanding the purpose for conducting this study?

Evaluating the Purpose Statement and Hypotheses

· Does the article clearly state the purpose statement?

· Is the purpose statement clearly based on the argument developed in the literature review?

· Are the variables of interest (i.e., independent and dependent) clearly identified in the problem statement?

· What type of hypothesis is presented?

· Is there a clear rationale for the direction of the hypothesis, based on the literature review?

· Is the hypothesis testable and falsifiable?

· Is the hypothesis consistent with current theories or research? Final Project Part II: Evaluate a Quantitative Study

 

· For populations that include 100 or fewer individuals, the entire population should be sampled.

· For populations that include 400–600 individuals, 50% of the population should be sampled.

· For populations that include 1,500 individuals, 20% of the population should be sampled.

· For populations that are 5,000 or larger, about 8% of the population should be sampled. (Note, however, that it is possible to have a sample that is so large that it does not justify the increased costs, and may produce significant differences that are too small to be meaningful).

 

· What type of research design was used?

· Was the research design consistent with the purpose and hypotheses?

· Did the researcher provide a detailed description of what was conducted?

· Did the researcher introduce any bias in the procedures used?

· Was the independent variable clearly defined?

· Were there any threats to the internal validity of the study?

· Were there any threats to the external validity of the study?

 

· Is there a clear and adequate description of the instrument (data collection measures) used?

· What types of instruments were used in the study (self-report inventories, ratings, etc.)?

· Are the instruments standardized?

· What are some of the potential problems or limitations with the types of instruments used?

· Does the instrument appear to be appropriate for the sample?

· Is the instrument consistent with the hypotheses?

· Is there a discussion about the reliability and validity of the instruments used?

 

· What descriptive statistics were used?

· Do the descriptive statistics adequately describe the sample?

· What types of inferential statistics were used?

· Are the inferential statistics used adequate to answer the hypotheses?

· Is the research design consistent with the statistical methods used?

· Did the researchers clearly restate the purpose and hypotheses?

· Did the researchers clearly discuss the implications of the findings and how they relate to theories, other findings, and actual practice?

· Did the researchers provide alternative explanations of the findings?

· Has there been appropriate generalization of significant findings beyond the sample to the population?

· Did the researchers identify potential limitations of the study and the results?

· Did the researchers identify possible directions for future research?

https://onlinenursingowl.com/2022/10/17/final-project-part-ii-evaluate-a-quantitative-study/

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS – Final Project Part II: Evaluate a Quantitative Study

Who we are

We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched for a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help with your coursework.

Do you handle any type of coursework?

Yes. We have posted our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication. Final Project Part II: Evaluate a Quantitative Study

Is it hard to Place an Order?

  • 1. Click on “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
  • 2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
  • 3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
  • 4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
  • 5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – Final Project Part II: Evaluate a Quantitative Study

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

  • Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

  • Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

  • APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

  • Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

  • LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. Final Project Part II: Evaluate a Quantitative Study

  • Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

  • Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

  • GuaranteeFinal Project Part II: Evaluate a Quantitative Study

  • Zero Plagiarism
  • On-time delivery
  • A-Grade Papers
  • Free Revision
  • 24/7 Support
  • 100% Confidentiality
  • Professional Writers

  • Services Offered

  • Custom paper writing
  • Question and answers
  • Essay paper writing
  • Editing and proofreading
  • Plagiarism removal services
  • Multiple answer questions

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. Final Project Part II: Evaluate a Quantitative Study

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

NEED HELP WITH YOUR NURSING ASSIGNMENTS ?

We are dedicated to delivering high quality nursing papers that adhere to the provided instructions, are adequately referenced with the latest scholarly knowledge,

Timely Delivery

Respecting your time and needs, we complete and deliver your orders within the specified timeframe.

Highly skilled writers

We employ experienced and qualified PhD and MD writers able to deal with any types of academic papers

100% unique content

Thorough research and the best academic writing practices ensure complete originality and high quality of every paper we deliver.

Order Now