Lab Report Paper: Levels-Of-Processing Experiment
Lab Report Paper: Levels-Of-Processing Experiment
Using the CogLab CD accompanying your course textbook, complete the levels-of-processing experiment and create a report on the experiment.
In your report, write a brief introduction of the experiment explaining the levels-of-processing framework. Next, in the Methods section, describe the process that you followed to complete the experiment. Make sure to include enough information so that others can also perform the same experiment successfully.
Finally, describe the experimental results in all the three conditions. In addition, identify the condition where you performed the best and the worst. Provide a rationale explaining why the results differed in all the three conditions. Summarize your report, including answers to the following questions:
- Were the results in accordance with your expectations? Provide a rationale to support your answer.
- Did anything about the experiment surprise you? If yes, what?
- What factors would influence the results of the levels-of-processing experiment?
Levels of Processing
What methods did we employ in this experiment?
There were two parts to this experiment. In Phase I, you were given a word and a judgment task. There were three types of judgments. The first type of judgment (letters) was to decide if the word had a particular pattern of consonants and vowels. The second type of judgment (rhyme) was to decide if two words rhymed. The third type of judgment (synonym) was to decide if one word was a synonym of another. In Phase II, you saw a series of words, half of which had been shown in Phase I. For each word, you were asked to indicate if it had been shown in Phase I. The independent variable in this experiment was the level of processing induced by the judgment task: shallow (the letters task), medium (the rhyme task), and deep (the semantic task). The dependent variable was the proportion of times the word was correctly recognized as being in Phase I.
What do we predict participants will do? Why?
People should correctly recognize more words with the deep processing task and fewer words with the shallow processing task. The reason is that on a standard word recognition task, most people use semantic information as a cue to retrieval, and the type of processing most appropriate for a semantically-driven task is also semantic processing at test.
How robust is this effect? Are there limits to this effect?
The effect is quite robust and is not limited to recognition tests. However, the effect can be altered if the test is changed. For example, if the test asked you whether there was a word on the list that rhymed with a particular test item, you would do better for those items you made a rhyme judgment on in Phase I than the items that you processed deeply.
Results for chicquila cox on May 14, 2015 6:32:29 PM EDT
Data summary for experiment Levels of Processing.
Accuracy on the recognition test as a function of the study condition in Phase I. The expected result is that recognition accuracy will show a levels of processing effect, with best performance for the deep task (synonyms) and worst performance for the shallow task (letters). Lure recognition is correct classification of an item not presented in Phase I.
Data summary
| Condition/Task | Proportion Correct |
| Letter Recognition | 0.55 |
| Rhyme Recognition | 0.6 |
| Synonym Recognition | 0.9 |
| Lure Recognition | 0.76666665 |
Trial-by-trial data
The Condition column describes the judgment task during Phase I. Here ‘lure’ means the item was not shown during Phase I. The study response and study accuracy columns indicate the response and accuracy of the response during Phase I. The recognition response and recognition accuracy columns correspond to the responses during the Phase II word recognition. Lab Report Paper: Levels-Of-Processing Experiment
SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – Lab Report Paper: Levels-Of-Processing Experiment
| Trial | Condition | Study Response | Study Accuracy | Recognition Response | Recognition Accuracy |
| 1 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 2 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 3 | synonym | N | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 4 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 5 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 6 | letter | N | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 7 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 8 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 9 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 10 | letter | Y | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 11 | letter | Y | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 12 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 13 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 14 | rhyme | Y | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 15 | lure | – | 0.0 | Y | 0.0 |
| 16 | rhyme | N | 1.0 | N | 0.0 |
| 17 | rhyme | Y | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 18 | rhyme | Y | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 19 | letter | Y | 1.0 | N | 0.0 |
| 20 | synonym | Y | 1.0 | N | 0.0 |
| 21 | synonym | N | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 22 | lure | – | 0.0 | Y | 0.0 |
| 23 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 24 | lure | – | 0.0 | Y | 0.0 |
| 25 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 26 | lure | – | 0.0 | Y | 0.0 |
| 27 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 28 | letter | Y | 1.0 | N | 0.0 |
| 29 | rhyme | Y | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 30 | synonym | Y | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 31 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 32 | synonym | Y | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 33 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 34 | rhyme | Y | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 35 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 36 | lure | – | 0.0 | Y | 0.0 |
| 37 | letter | N | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 38 | letter | Y | 1.0 | N | 0.0 |
| 39 | rhyme | N | 1.0 | N | 0.0 |
| 40 | rhyme | N | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 41 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 42 | letter | Y | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 43 | lure | – | 0.0 | Y | 0.0 |
| 44 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 45 | lure | – | 0.0 | Y | 0.0 |
| 46 | synonym | N | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 47 | rhyme | Y | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 48 | rhyme | Y | 1.0 | N | 0.0 |
| 49 | lure | – | 0.0 | Y | 0.0 |
| 50 | synonym | Y | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 51 | synonym | N | 0.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 52 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 53 | synonym | Y | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 54 | rhyme | Y | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 55 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 56 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 57 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 58 | lure | – | 0.0 | Y | 0.0 |
| 59 | synonym | Y | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 60 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 61 | letter | Y | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 62 | synonym | Y | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 63 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 64 | synonym | Y | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 65 | rhyme | N | 1.0 | N | 0.0 |
| 66 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 67 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 68 | synonym | Y | 1.0 | N | 0.0 |
| 69 | letter | N | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 70 | letter | N | 1.0 | N | 0.0 |
| 71 | letter | Y | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 72 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 73 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 74 | synonym | Y | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 75 | rhyme | N | 1.0 | N | 0.0 |
| 76 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 77 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 78 | lure | – | 0.0 | Y | 0.0 |
| 79 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 80 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 81 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 82 | synonym | Y | 0.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 83 | lure | – | 0.0 | Y | 0.0 |
| 84 | rhyme | Y | 1.0 | N | 0.0 |
| 85 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 86 | rhyme | Y | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 87 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 88 | rhyme | Y | 1.0 | N | 0.0 |
| 89 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 90 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 91 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 92 | rhyme | N | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 93 | synonym | N | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 94 | synonym | N | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 95 | synonym | Y | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 96 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 97 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 98 | letter | N | 1.0 | N | 0.0 |
| 99 | lure | – | 0.0 | Y | 0.0 |
| 100 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 101 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 102 | letter | Y | 1.0 | N | 0.0 |
| 103 | rhyme | Y | 0.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 104 | lure | – | 0.0 | Y | 0.0 |
| 105 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 106 | lure | – | 0.0 | Y | 0.0 |
| 107 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 108 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 109 | letter | N | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 110 | letter | Y | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 111 | rhyme | Y | 1.0 | N | 0.0 |
| 112 | letter | N | 1.0 | N | 0.0 |
| 113 | letter | Y | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 114 | synonym | Y | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 115 | letter | Y | 1.0 | N | 0.0 |
| 116 | letter | N | 1.0 | N | 0.0 |
| 117 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 118 | rhyme | N | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
| 119 | lure | – | 0.0 | N | 1.0 |
| 120 | synonym | N | 1.0 | Y | 1.0 |
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS
Who we are
Do you handle any type of coursework?
Yes. We have posted our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication.Is it hard to Place an Order?
- 1. Click on “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
- 2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
- 3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
- 4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
- 5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.
SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – Lab Report Paper: Levels-Of-Processing Experiment
We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.
- Discussion Questions (DQ)
Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
- Weekly Participation
Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. Lab Report Paper: Levels-Of-Processing Experiment
- APA Format and Writing Quality
Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
- Use of Direct Quotes
I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.
- LopesWrite Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
- Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
- Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours. Lab Report Paper: Levels-Of-Processing Experiment
- Guarantee
- Zero Plagiarism
- On-time delivery
- A-Grade Papers
- Free Revision
- 24/7 Support
- 100% Confidentiality
- Professional Writers
- Services Offered
- Custom paper writing
- Question and answers
- Essay paper writing
- Editing and proofreading
- Plagiarism removal services
- Multiple answer questions
We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. Lab Report Paper: Levels-Of-Processing Experiment
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper
SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – Lab Report Paper: Levels-Of-Processing Experiment
NEED HELP WITH YOUR NURSING ASSIGNMENTS ?
We are dedicated to delivering high quality nursing papers that adhere to the provided instructions, are adequately referenced with the latest scholarly knowledge,
Timely Delivery
Respecting your time and needs, we complete and deliver your orders within the specified timeframe.
Highly skilled writers
We employ experienced and qualified PhD and MD writers able to deal with any types of academic papers