Neurological And Musculoskeletal Disorders

Neurological And Musculoskeletal Disorders

Decision Tree For Neurological And Musculoskeletal Disorders

Week 6 Assignment:
By Day 7 of Week 8
Write a 1- to 2-page summary paper that addresses the following:

  • Briefly summarize the patient case study you were assigned, including each of the three decisions you took for the patient presented.
  • Based on the decisions you recommended for the patient case study, explain whether you believe the decisions provided were supported by the evidence-based literature. Be specific and provide examples. Be sure to support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.
  • What were you hoping to achieve with the decisions you recommended for the patient case study you were assigned? Support your response with evidence and references from outside resources.
  • Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with each of the decisions and the results of the decision in the exercise. Describe whether they were different. Be specific and provide examples.Running head: COMPLEX REGIONAL PAIN DISORDER 1

    Complex Regional Pain Disorder Case Study
    Colleen Lemmer
    Walden University
    Complex Regional Pain Disorder
    Pain and sleep/ wake disorders have become prevalent in the recent years. Previous research done indicates that sleep/wake disorders are more common, underdiagnosed and mostly affects elderly people who suffer serious consequences (Miguel, & Albuquerque, 2011). Patients suffer from insomnia and prevalence of the disorders increases with the elderly in the population being affected most. Clinicians and therapists make common misconceptions by assuming that the condition is an expected phenomena that is associated with old age and therefore is normal (Miguel, & Albuquerque, 2011). Contrary to therapists and doctor’s misconceptions, research conducted indicates that the increased disorders are a result of increased psychosocial comorbidities in the population.
    Recent research and publications indicate that pain and wake related disorders should be regarded and treated as a multifactorial geriatric syndrome and therefore should be addressed with high attention. Many therapists and clinicians consider enough and good sleep to be essential towards achieving better health (Barbehenn, & Wolfe, 2010). For purposes of this assignment, the paper involves a case study about Caucasian man with hip pain. The paper involves decisions concerning medication to prescribe.
    From the symptoms outlined in the Caucasian man case study and recommended prescriptions of medications, it is evident that the patient is suffering from Complex regional pain disorder which is also referred to as reflex sympathetic dystrophy. The syndrome involves chronic pain that either affects legs or arms. The syndrome occurs after an individual goes through a surgery, heart attack, and stroke or after an injury. Complex regional pain disease causes aren’t clearly understood and is mostly common with the elderly. Doctors and therapists recommend early diagnosis and treatment of the condition to increase chances of completely eradicating it.
    Symptoms of Complex regional pain syndrome include; decreased ability to move affected body part, swelling, sensitivity to cold and touch, changes in hair and nail growth, tremors, muscle spasms and atrophy (Jänig, & Baron, 2003). However, symptoms may differ from one individual to the other where swelling, pain, hypersensitivity and changes in temperature being most common. Several therapies and medications are recommended and below discussion outline various medications for complex regional pain.
    Decision Point 1
    Decision point 1 involved selecting between two drugs which were; Savella 12.5 mg that were to be administered orally in day one. The drug was also supposed to be administered in day 2 where 12.5 mg was to be administered twice. 7.25 mg was to be administered two times a day and 50 mg thereafter. The second option in making the first decision involved Amitriptyline where 25 mg would be taken during bedtime and 300 mg of Neurontin two times a day.
    Psychiatric-mental health Nurse Practitioners (PMHNP) should recommend Savella in the Caucasian case study. From the results and side effects outlined in the case study, they are similar to those associated to Savella. The drug is used to treat psychiatric and depression disorders and is referred to as norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor with selective serotonin (Barbehenn, & Wolfe, 2010).
    Savella is administered orally without food. By taking the drugs without food, tolerability of the drug is enhanced. According to the case study, the patient is supposed to return after 4 weeks. According to the patient, the pain had significantly reduced which is an effect of savella drug that aids in relieving pain. Savella drug is known to cause various side effects such as; nausea, vomiting, constipation, increased sweating, headache and the occurrence of hot flashes (Barbehenn, & Wolfe, 2010). According to the case study, the client is reported to be suffering from bouts of swelling with no main cause together with nausea and suffers from insomnia too. Therefore, it is evident that the side effects that emerged were as a result of the savella drug.
    By making the decision that a psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioner should opt for Savella dosage, it was to achieve and capture the side effects caused by the drug as well as its healing capability. Administering the drug to the patient was to also act as proof that savella is used to heal and relieve chronic pain. According to research, savella should be taken two times a day just like in the Caucasian case study. After four weeks of administering the drug, dosage can be reduced based on the patient’s medical condition and how best he is responsive to treatment.
    The expectations in decision one were that the client would have homicide and suicidal thoughts as a side effect. Savella is known to cause suicidal thoughts to clients taking the drugs (Barbehenn, & Wolfe, 2010). However, in the Caucasian case study, the client reports to claim that he had been suffering from suicide and homicide thoughts. Instead, the patients report that the future looks good. The difference was attributed to the patient’s positive thoughts about life. For example, the client at some time claims that one of the doctors he had met before had suggested for a wheelchair for the patient which he did not admit and instead said that he was okay and did not require one. In addition, he is optimistic about life since he had been recently engaged and was looking up to for marriage. Therefore, the patient’s positive attitude towards life made the client not suffer from suicidal thoughts and thus the difference between the expectations and actual results presented after usage of the drug.
    Clinical Decision point 2
    The Psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioner had an option of continuing with current medication which was Savella but this time lower it. The second option was to discontinue savella and instead start to use lyrica by administering 50mg twice in a day. The third option for the nurse was to discontinue savella and administer 50 mg of Zoloft twice a day.
    In clinical decision point 2, the psychiatric-mental health nurse should discontinue the use of savella since the client reported that the situation had not been cured. He is reported to claim that he suffered pain with a range of 4 out of 10 and wanted that to reduce to 3. Therefore, the nurse had to try a different drug and monitor how well the patient would recover from the condition.
    For Clinical decision point 2, the psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioner should recommend the introduction of Zoloft. From the results of clinical decision one, the patient continued to suffer from lack of sleep. Zoloft is therefore recommended to improve on sleep and the mood. The drug has several other uses such as treating; panic attacks, obsessive-compulsive disorders, social phobia, post-traumatic stresses and severe form of premenstrual syndrome disorder (Miguel, & Albuquerque, 2011).
    According to the Caucasian case study, the patient reported to have no suicidal and homicide thoughts. Meanwhile, the pain increased from 4 to 3 out of 10 and that the condition did not improve, instead, it worsened. However, the client no longer experienced difficulties in sleeping. Moreover, his blood pressure was reported to have increased but did not suffer palpitations. The improvements to better sleep can be associated with the introduction of the new drug Zoloft. The drug may be administered with food or without. The best times to take the drugs should be in the morning or after the evening meal. The drug is associated with many side effects and therefore, a doctor may recommend that a patient start on a low dosage and later increase it to control the effects. Some of the common side effects include; nausea, dry mouth, diarrhea, stomach upset and drowsiness.
    The expectations of using the drug included reduced pain from 4 to 3 out of 10. Though there were improvements in sleep, it was affected by the severe pain. It was expected that the patient would get enough sleep. Heart rate and pressure were expected to remain at normal rates. Research conducted does not show any side effects that cause increased heartbeat and pressure. The drug is associated with boosting a patient’s mood and the reason he never suffers from homicide and suicidal thoughts.
    The difference between the expectations and the actual results presented is attributed to the mix up of drugs. The body did not adapt to the sudden changes introduced and therefore reason as to why pain increased. The positive moods caused by the drug are a reason as to why the client does not have suicidal thoughts. Moreover, the patient was evaluated after four weeks. The time was a long period since it was a new drug. The psychiatric mental health practitioners should have recommended the patient to return to the clinic after a week in order to urgently monitor his progress. For example, if the patient visited the clinic after a week, the nurse would have been in a position to detect increased pain to 7 out of 10 and thus change the dosage or medication.
    Clinical Decision 3
    In clinical decision 3, the nurse had the option of using Savella but increase the dosage from 12 mg to 25 mg in the morning and 50 mg during bedtime. The psychiatric nurse practitioner had also an option to discontinue savella and instead introduce 50 mg of tramadol. In addition, the nurse had an option of introducing a new drug calexa with 12.5 mg.
    The PMHNP nurse should prescribe Salville. The drug should at this stage be increased to a higher amount. From the results of clinical decision 1, the patient had recorded improvements in her condition, especially on pain. Therefore, the client ought to have continued with the medication to improve the condition further.
    The expectations after deciding to continue with the drug were that pain would reduce to probably a rate below 4 out of 10 like he experienced after decision one. Further expectations were that the patient would now have peaceful sleep since Zoloft had already cured insomnia. At end of stage 2, the patient reported to only lack sleep due to pain. Therefore, since pain would be reduced through the introduction of more dosage, the patient would have enough sleep. At this stage, the patient was still optimistic that he would heal and therefore pain would end and therefore did not have homicidal and suicidal thoughts
    The difference between the expectations and the results was the increased pain. The patient reported complex neuropathic pain syndrome which was feared not to respond to pain medication. By the second re-introduction of the drug, the patient could have suffered from resistance to the drugs which resulted to increased pain (Barbehenn, & Wolfe, 2010). Tramadol and celexa were ruled because they were not good and were feared to cause severe side effects such as serotonin toxicity.
    How Ethical Considerations Might Impact Treatment Plan
    According to APA ethics standards, psychiatrists and psychologists are mandated to maintain the confidentiality of their patients. However, confidentiality is sometimes breached for example in instances where insurance companies require details about patients in order to make hospital bill payments (Kerridge, & Stewart, 2009).
    Patient Abandonment
    Psychologists are not supposed to abandon patients. However, in a multidisciplinary setting, psychologists are faced by ethical issues where at time patients are abandoned. According to APA standards, psychologists should provide pre-termination counselling (Rezai, &Zonenshayn, 2002).
    Clinical Research
    In most cases, psychologists are required to conduct and participate in clinical research especially in a multidisciplinary setting. However, ethical issues may arise for example in choosing appropriate and adequate control groups.
    Psychology’s Interface with Medicine
    Patients are treated with multiple medications. However, ethical issues may arise when too many drugs are recommended to the patient and at times end up being ineffective. APA standards stipulate that psychologists should provide services that are within their boundaries (Rezai, &Zonenshayn, 2002).
    Patient Autonomy and Informed Consent
    Chronic pain illness sometimes requires patients to fill in informed consents regarding hospitalization and medication. However, ethical issues may arise in instances where a patient is forced into medication and treatment.
    Barbehenn, E., & Wolfe, S. (2010). Petition to ban fibromyalgia drug milnacipran (Savella). Public Citizen20.
    Jänig, W., & Baron, R. (2003). Complex regional pain syndrome: mystery explained?. The Lancet Neurology2(11), 687-697.
    Kerridge, I., Lowe, M., & Stewart, C. (2009). Ethics and law for the health professions (p. 225). Sydney: Federation Press.
    Miguel, C., & Albuquerque, E. (2011). Drug interaction in psycho-oncology: antidepressants and antineoplastics. Pharmacology88(5-6), 333-339.
    Rezai, A. R., &Zonenshayn, M. (2002). U.S. Patent No. 6,438,423. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.


    Who We Are 

    We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched for a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help with your coursework.

    Do you handle any type of coursework?

    Yes. We have posted our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication.

    Is it hard to Place an Order?

    • 1. Click on “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
    • 2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
    • 3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
    • 4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
    • 5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.


    We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

    • Discussion Questions (DQ)

    Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

    • Weekly Participation

    Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

    • APA Format and Writing Quality

    Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

    • Use of Direct Quotes

    I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

    • LopesWrite Policy

    For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

    • Late Policy

    The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

    • Communication

    Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

    • Guarantee

    • Zero Plagiarism
    • On-time delivery
    • A-Grade Papers
    • Free Revision
    • 24/7 Support
    • 100% Confidentiality
    • Professional Writers

    • Services Offered

    • Custom paper writing
    • Question and answers
    • Essay paper writing
    • Editing and proofreading
    • Plagiarism removal services
    • Multiple answer questions


    We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

    Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper


We are dedicated to delivering high quality nursing papers that adhere to the provided instructions, are adequately referenced with the latest scholarly knowledge,

Timely Delivery

Respecting your time and needs, we complete and deliver your orders within the specified timeframe.

Highly skilled writers

We employ experienced and qualified PhD and MD writers able to deal with any types of academic papers

100% unique content

Thorough research and the best academic writing practices ensure complete originality and high quality of every paper we deliver.

Order Now