Boost your Grades with us today! Get your 15% Discount Now!
NR 449 Evidence BASED Practice
NR 449 Evidence BASED Practice RUA Analyzing Published Research
NR449 Evidence Based Practice
Required Uniform Assignment: Analyzing Published Research Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to interpret the two articles identified as most important to the group topic.
COURSE OUTCOMES This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes: CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (POs #4 and #8)
CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and clinical significance related to evidence- based practice. (POs #4 and #8)
DUE DATE Refer to the course calendar for due date information. The college’s Late Assignment policy applies to this activity.
TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE: 200 POINTS REQUIREMENTS The paper will include the following.
1. Clinical question a. Description of problem b. Significance of problem c. Purpose of paper
2. Description of findings a. Summarize basics in the Matrix Table as found in Assignment Documents in e-College. b. Describe
i. Concepts ii. Methods used iii. Participants iv. Instruments including reliability and validity v. Answer to “Purpose” question vi. Identify next step for group
3. Conclusion of paper 4. Format
a. Correct grammar and spelling b. Use of headings for each section
NR449 Evidence Based Practice c. Use of APA format (sixth edition) d. Page length: three pages
PREPARING THE PAPER 1. Please make sure you do not duplicate articles within your group. 2. Paper should include a title page and a reference page.
DIRECTIONS AND ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA
Assignment Criteria
Points % Description
Clinical Question
30
15%
1. Problem is described: What is the focus of your group’s work? 2. Significance of the problem is described: What health outcomes result
from your problem? Or what statistics document this is a problem? You may find support on websites for government or professional organizations.
3. Purpose of your paper: What will your paper do or describe? “The purpose of this paper is to . . .”
**Please note that although most of these questions are the same as you addressed in paper 1, the purpose of this paper is different. You can use your work from paper 1 for items 1 and 2 above, including any suggestions for improvement provided as feedback. Item 3 above should be specific to this paper.
Description of Findings: Summary
60
30%
Summarize the basics of each article in a matrix table that appears in the appendix.
Description of Findings:
Description 60 30%
Describe in the body of the paper the following. • What concepts have been studied? • What methods have been used? • Who are the participants or members of the samples? • What instruments have been used? Did the authors describe the
reliability and validity? • How do you answer your original “purpose of this paper” question?
Do the findings of the articles provide evidence for your answers? If so, how? If not, what is still needed to be able to answer your question?
• What is needed for the next step? Identify two questions that can help guide the group’s work.
Description of Findings: Conclusion 20 10%
Conclusion: Review major findings in your paper in a summary paragraph.
Format 30
15%
1. Correct grammar and spelling 2. Use headings for each section: Problem, Synthesis of the Literature
(Concepts, Methods, Participants, Instruments, Implications for Future Work), Conclusion.
3. APA format (sixth ed.): Appendices follow references. 4. Paper length: Three pages
Total 200 100%
NR449 RUA Analyzing Published Research .docx Revised 07 / 25 /2016 2
NR449 Evidence Based Practice
NR449 RUA A nalyzing Published Research .docx Revised 07/25 /2016 4
GRADING RUBRIC
Assignment Criteria
Outstanding or Highest Level of Performance
A (92–100%)
Very Good or High Level of Performance
B (84–91%)
Competent or Satisfactory Level of Performance
C (76–83%)
Poor, Failing or Unsatisfactory Level of
Performance F (0–75%)
Clinical Question (30 points)
Includes all elements in a manner that is clearly understood.
• Problem description provides focus of the group’s work.
• Significance of the problem is clearly stated and supported by current evidence.
• Purpose of paper is clearly stated.
28-30 points
Missing only one element
OR One element is not presented clearly
• Problem description provides focus of the group’s work.
• Significance of the problem is clearly stated and supported by current evidence.
• Purpose of paper is clearly stated.
26-27 points
Missing two elements
OR One element is not presented clearly
• Problem description provides focus of the group’s work.
• Significance of the problem is clearly stated and supported by current evidence.
• Purpose of paper is clearly stated.
23-25 points
Missing two or more elements
AND/OR One or more elements are not presented clearly
• Problem description provides focus of the group’s work.
• Significance of the problem is clearly stated and supported by current evidence.
• Purpose of paper is clearly stated.
0-22 points
Description of Findings: Summary (60 points)
Summary omits no more than one required item from the Evidence Matrix Table.
55-60 points
Summary omits two or three required items from the Evidence Matrix Table.
51-55 points
Summary omits four required items from the Evidence Matrix Table.
46-50 points
Summary omits five or more required items from the Evidence Matrix Table.
0–45
points
NR449 Evidence Based Practice
NR449 RUA A nalyzing Published Research .docx Revised 07/25 /2016 5
Description of Findings: Description (60 points)
Description includes ALL elements.
• What concepts have been studied?
• What methods have been used?
Description missing no more than one element.
• What concepts have been
studied? • What methods have been
used?
Description missing no more than two elements.
• What concepts have been
studied? • What methods have been
used?
Description missing three or more elements.
• What concepts have been
studied? • What methods have been
used?
NR449 Evidence Based Practice
NR449 RUA A nalyzing Published Research .docx Revised 07/25 /2016 6
• Who are the participants or members of the samples?
• What instruments have been used? Did the authors describe the reliability and validity?
• How do you answer your original “the purpose of this paper” question? Do the findings of the articles provide evidence for your answers? If so, how? If not, what is still needed to be able to answer your question?
• What is needed for the next step? Identify two questions that can help guide the group’s work.
56–60 points
• Who are the participants or members of the samples?
• What instruments have been used? Did the authors describe the reliability and validity?
• How do you answer your original “the purpose of this paper” question? Do the findings of the articles provide evidence for your answers? If so, how? If not, what is still needed to be able to answer your question?
• What is needed for the next step? Identify two questions that can help guide the group’s work.
51–55 points
• Who are the participants or members of the samples?
• What instruments have been used? Did the authors describe the reliability and validity?
• How do you answer your original “the purpose of this paper” question? Do the findings of the articles provide evidence for your answers? If so, how? If not, what is still needed to be able to answer your question?
• What is needed for the next step? Identify two questions that can help guide the group’s work.
46–50 points
• Who are the participants or members of the samples?
• What instruments have been used? Did the authors describe the reliability and validity?
• How do you answer your original “the purpose of this paper” question? Do the findings of the articles provide evidence for your answers? If so, how? If not, what is still needed to be able to answer your question?
• What is needed for the next step? Identify two questions that can help guide the group’s work.
0–45 points
NR449 Evidence Based Practice
NR449 RUA A nalyzing Published Research .docx Revised 07/25 /2016 7
Description of Findings: Conclusion (20 points)
Summary paragraph includes ALL major findings from article.
• Independently extracts
complex data from a variety of quantitative sources, presents those data in summary form, makes appropriate
Summary paragraph omits ONE major finding from article.
• Independently extracts complex
data from a variety of quantitative sources, presents those data in summary form, makes appropriate connections and inferences consistent with the data, and
Summary paragraph omits TWO major findings from article.
• Independently extracts complex
data from a variety of quantitative sources, presents those data in summary form, makes appropriate connections and inferences consistent with the data, and
Summary paragraph omits THREE or MORE major findings from article.
• Independently extracts complex
data from a variety of quantitative sources, presents those data in summary form, makes appropriate connections and inferences
connections and inferences consistent with the data, and relates them to a larger context.
• Recognizes points of view and value assumptions in formulating interpretation of data collected and articulates the point of view in a given situation.
• Identifies misrepresentations in the presentation points of quantitative data and the logical and empirical fallacies in inferences drawn from data. 19-20 points
relates them to a larger context. • Recognizes points of view and
value assumptions in formulating interpretation of data collected and articulates the point of view in a given situation.
• Identifies misrepresentations in the presentation of quantitative data and the logical and empirical fallacies in inferences drawn from data.
17-18 points
relates them to a larger context. • Recognizes points of view and
value assumptions in formulating interpretation of data collected and articulates the point of view in a given situation.
• Identifies misrepresentations in the presentation of quantitative data and the logical and empirical fallacies in inferences drawn from data.
16 points
consistent with the data, and relates them to a larger context.
• Recognizes points of view and value assumptions in formulating interpretation of data collected and articulates the point of view in a given situation.
• Identifies misrepresentations in the presentation of quantitative data and the logical and empirical fallacies in inferences drawn from data.
0-15 points
NR449 Evidence Based Practice
NR449 RUA A nalyzing Published Research .docx Revised 07/25 /2016 8
Grammar, Spelling, Mechanics, and APA Format (30 points)
• Length is three full pages.
• Used appropriate APA
format and is free of errors.
• Includes ALL headings
and subheadings as instructed.
• Grammar, spelling, and mechanics are free of errors.
28–30 points
• Length is no more than one quarter page under or over.
• Used appropriate APA format, with one type of error.
• Includes ALL headings and
subheadings as instructed. • Grammar, spelling, and
mechanics have one type of error.
26–27 points
• Length is no more than one half page under or over.
• Used appropriate APA format, with two types of errors.
• Includes ALL headings and
subheadings as instructed. • Grammar, spelling, and
mechanics have two types of errors.
23–25 points
• Length is three quarters of a page or more under or over.
• Attempts made to use APA format; three or more types of errors are present.
• Includes ALL headings and subheadings as instructed.
• Grammar, spelling, and mechanics have three or more types of errors.
0–22 points
Total Points Possible = 200 points
- COURSE OUTCOMES
- DUE DATE
- TOTAL POINTS POSSIBLE: 200 POINTS REQUIREMENTS
- PREPARING THE PAPER
- DIRECTIONS AND ASSIGNMENT CRITERIA
- GRADING RUBRIC
ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS
Who We Are
We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched for a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework.Do you handle any type of coursework?
Yes. We have posted over our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications and future communication.
Is it hard to Place an Order?
ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT
1. Click on the “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
100% Reliable Site. Make this your Home of Academic Papers.
SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS: ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT
Always Order High-Quality Academic Papers from HERE
5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.
We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so that it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper