NR504 Week 6 Assignment

NR504 Week 6 Assignment: Peer Engagement Forum Paper

NR504 Week 6 Assignment: Peer Engagement Forum Paper

1. Provide a concise introduction for your posting.
2. Using an economy of words, create and describe a potential case scenario involving a MSN-prepared nurse in your selected area of practice. Within the scenario, identify a specific problem that needs to be addressed. Examples might include a new curriculum, change in the EHR, decreasing patient satisfaction rates, safety risks, or another situation that impacts your future MSN role. NR504 Week 6 Assignment: Peer Engagement Forum Paper
3. Formulate a recommended change that could resolve the situation, and explain the intended impact.
4. Discuss how Kotter’s Change Model would be applied in your recommended change initiative.
5. Identify one specific leadership strategy to facilitate change, and describe how it is congruent with Kotter’s Change Model.
6. Conclude with a succinct synopsis of key points and concise self-reflection of how this topic contributes to your growth as a future leader in the chosen specialty track.

Please note that the requirements for the Peer Engagement Forum are different from what you are accustomed to in the traditional discussion boards in your previous classes. Refer to the assignment guideline and rubric listed below for specific requirements regarding expectations for postings within the peer engagement forum.

Instructors reserve the right to alter assigned peer engagement groups to maximize the student experience and course outcomes.  NR504 Week 6 Assignment: Peer Engagement Forum Paper

ORDER Assignment: Peer Engagement Forum Paper

Purpose

The Peer Engagement Forum will take place during four weeks in the NR 504 course and is designed to provide students with an opportunity to engage and dialogue at a deeper level with a small group of peers. Weeks during which Peer Engagement will occur include weeks two, five, six, and seven

Course Outcomes

Throughout the course of the four Peer Engagement Forums, the following Course Outcomes will be addressed:

· CO #1 – Discern leadership approaches that facilitate achievement of health outcomes through interprofessional collaborative practice within micro-, meso-, and macro-level systems.

· CO #2 – Appraise the role of the MSN-prepared nurse to lead safe, efficient, ethical, high-quality, person-centered health care across complex systems.

· CO #3 – Integrate communication modalities which convey cultural humility, value the diverse nature of individuals, and cultivate healthful work environments. NR504 Week 6 Assignment: Peer Engagement Forum Paper

· CO #4 -Apply change and leadership theories to plan sustainable, evidence-based quality improvement within an atmosphere which supports care for self and others.

· CO #5 – Recognize individual strengths and opportunities for enhancement regarding leadership characteristics reflective of a MSN-prepared nurse.

Due Date

· Primary (initial) posting to the Peer Engagement Forum is due by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT during the designated week in which the forum occurs

· All responsive postings and answers to questions posed directly to students are due by Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of the designated week in which the forum occurs. NR504 Week 6 Peer Engagement Forum Paper

Total Points Possible: 100 points

Assignment: Peer Engagement Forum Paper Requirements

Criteria for Content

· Based upon readings and learning activities within the class lessons, create a primary (initial) posting in response to the specific Peer Engagement Forum discussion questions which are described within the module. Please refer to the modules for weeks two, five, six, and seven to locate specific discussion instructions.

· Your primary posting must be a minimum of 300 words and no more than 500 words in length (not including the reference list).

· Include a minimum of two current, peer-reviewed, scholarly sources to support your primary posting in the Peer Engagement Forum.

· Respond in a substantive manner to at least two peers during the assigned week. Responsive postings must be a minimum of 100 words and no more than 300 words in length (not including any reference list, should one be included).

· Respond in a substantive manner by Sunday at 11:59 pm MT to all questions directed specifically to you. You are required to address questions posed before Saturday at 11:59 pm MT directly to you. NR504 Week 6 Assignment: Peer Engagement Forum Paper

Preparing the Assignment

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

1. Abide by the Chamberlain College of Nursing Academic Integrity Policy.

2. Post your primary (initial) response to the Peer Engagement Forum by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT during the assigned week.

a. Primary posting must be at least 300 words and no more than 500 words in length (not including the reference list).

b. A minimum of two peer-reviewed scholarly sources, current within five years, are required to support the primary posting.

3. Post a minimum of two substantive, responsive postings to peers by Sunday at 11:59 pm MT at the end of the assigned week.

a. Responsive postings must each be at least 100 words and no more than 300 words in length (not including any reference list, should one be included).

4. Respond in a substantive manner to all questions directed specifically to you. You are required to address questions posed before Saturday at 11:59 pm MT directly to you. NR504 Week 6 Assignment: Peer Engagement Forum Paper

5. No direct quotes may be used in this forum.

6. Sources older than five years may not be used without the permission of the class professor.

7. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure are followed and consistent with formal, scholarly writing as noted in the APA Manual (6th edition).

8. Correct APA format is used for citing and referencing of sources.

Assignment Criteria

Grading Criteria –

ORDER Assignment: Peer Engagement Forum Paper

Chamberlain College of Nursing NR504: Leadership and Nursing Practice: Role Development

Assignment: Peer Engagement Forum Paper Grading Rubric

Assignment Criteria Exemplary

(100%)

Accomplished

(92%)

Average

(84%)

Marginally Acceptable

(76%)

Insufficient

(0%)

Content

Possible Points = 80 Points

Quality and Depth of Primary (initial) Posting 40 Points 36 Points 33 Points 30 Points 0 Points

Exemplary presentation of information evidenced by all content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner.

All of the following are included:

· Includes an introduction to the posting

· Addresses each element within the discussion question in a thorough manner

· Demonstrates insightful application of course concepts and information

· Includes a summary of key points shared

· Discusses how learning specific to this topic contributes to growth as a future leader in the chosen specialty track

· Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented

Accomplished presentation of information evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial.

All of the following are included:

· Includes an introduction to the posting

· Addresses each element within the discussion question in a thorough manner

· Demonstrates insightful application of course concepts and information

· Includes a summary of key points shared

· Discusses how learning specific to this topic contributes to growth as a future leader in the chosen specialty track

· Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented

Average presentation of information evidenced by content covered in a superficial manner in two or more of the content areas. NR504 Week 6 Assignment: Peer Engagement Forum Paper

All of the following are included:

· Includes an introduction to the posting

· Addresses each element within the discussion question in a thorough manner

· Demonstrates insightful application of course concepts and information

· Includes a summary of key points shared

· Discusses how learning specific to this topic contributes to growth as a future leader in the chosen specialty track

· Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented. NR504 Week 6 Assignment: Peer Engagement Forum Paper

Marginally acceptable presentation of information evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in one of the following:

· Includes an introduction to the posting

· Addresses each element within the discussion question in a thorough manner

· Demonstrates insightful application of course concepts and information

· Includes a summary of key points shared

· Discusses how learning specific to this topic contributes to growth as a future leader in the chosen specialty track. NR504 Week 6 Assignment: Peer Engagement Forum Paper

· Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented

Insufficient presentation of information evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in two or more of the following:

· Includes an introduction to the posting

· Addresses each element within the discussion question in a thorough manner

· Demonstrates insightful application of course concepts and information

· Includes a summary of key points shared

· Discusses how learning specific to this topic contributes to growth as a future leader in the chosen specialty track

· Sufficient integration of scholarly literature to support information presented

Quality and Depth of Peer Engagement 40 Points 36 Points 33 Points 30 Points 0 Points

Exemplary engagement evidenced by all content areas covered in a comprehensive and concise manner.

All of the following are included:

· Minimum of two responsive postings

· Responsive postings are made to a minimum of two individual peers

· Each responsive posting includes substantive content which poses new ideas, asks questions, prompts additional dialogue, and adds to the discussion topic in a meaningful and constructive manner

· Substantive responses are provided to all questions directed specifically to the student. Students are required to address questions posed before Saturday night at 11:59 pm MT directly to them.

Accomplished engagement evidenced by most content covered in a comprehensive and concise manner, but with one area where coverage is superficial.

All of the following are included:

· Minimum of two responsive postings

· Responsive postings are made to a minimum of two individual peers

· Each responsive posting includes substantive content which poses new ideas, asks questions, prompts additional dialogue, and adds to the discussion topic in a meaningful and constructive manner. NR504 Week 6 Assignment: Peer Engagement Forum Paper

· Substantive responses are provided to all questions directed specifically to the student. Students are required to address questions posed before Saturday night at 11:59 pm MT directly to them.

Average engagement evidenced by content covered in a superficial manner in two or more of the content areas. NR504 Week 6 Assignment: Peer Engagement Forum Paper

All of the following are included:

· Minimum of two responsive postings

· Responsive postings are made to a minimum of two individual peers

· Each responsive posting includes substantive content which poses new ideas, asks questions, prompts additional dialogue, and adds to the discussion topic in a meaningful and constructive manner

· Substantive responses are provided to all questions directed specifically to the student. Students are required to address questions posed before Saturday night at 11:59 pm MT directly to them. NR504 Week 6 Assignment: Peer Engagement Forum Paper

Marginally acceptable engagement evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in one of the following:

· Minimum of two responsive postings

· Responsive postings are made to a minimum of two individual peers. NR504 Week 6 Assignment: Peer Engagement Forum Paper

· Each responsive posting includes substantive content which poses new ideas, asks questions, prompts additional dialogue, and adds to the discussion topic in a meaningful and constructive manner

· Substantive responses are provided to all questions directed specifically to the student. Students are required to address questions posed before Saturday night at 11:59 pm MT directly to them.

Insufficient engagement evidenced by content that is limited, missing, or unsatisfactory in two or more of the following:

· Minimum of two responsive postings

· Responsive postings are made to a minimum of two individual peers

· Each responsive posting includes substantive content which poses new ideas, asks questions, prompts additional dialogue, and adds to the discussion topic in a meaningful and constructive manner

· Substantive responses are provided to all questions directed specifically to the student. Students are required to address questions posed before Saturday night at 11:59 pm MT directly to them.

Content Subtotal ________of 80 points
Format

Possible Points = 20 Points

Graduate-level Writing Style 20 Points 18 Points 16 Points 15 Points 0 Points

Exemplary graduate level writing style is evident, which fully meets all of the criteria below:

· Correct spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure

· Exceptional writing style with clarity, flow, and organization of information

· Correct APA format for citing sources

· Correct APA format for referencing sources

· No direct quote is used within the assignment

Accomplished graduate-level writing style is evident which fully meets four of the criteria below:

· No more than 2 errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure

· No more than 2 errors in writing style with clarity, flow, and organization of information

· No more than 2 errors in APA format for citing

· No more than 2 errors in APA format for referencing sources

· No direct quote is used within the assignment

Average graduate-level writing style is evident which fully meets three of the criteria below:

· No more than 2 errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure

· No more than 2 errors in writing style with clarity, flow, and organization of information

· No more than 2 errors in APA format for citing

· No more than 2 errors in APA format for referencing sources

· No direct quote is used within the assignment

Marginally acceptable graduate-level writing is evident which fully meets two of the criteria below:

· No more than 2 errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure

· No more than 2 errors in writing style with clarity, flow, and organization of information

· No more than 2 errors in APA format for citing

· No more than 2 errors in APA format for referencing sources

· No direct quote is used within the assignment

Insufficient graduate-level writing style is evident which fully meets one or less of the criteria below:

· No more than 2 errors in spelling, grammar, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure

· No more than 2 errors in writing style with clarity, flow, and organization of information

· No more than 2 errors in APA format for citing

· No more than 2 errors in APA format for referencing sources

· No direct quote is used within the assignment

Quality of Literature Support 0 Points Deducted NR504 Week 6 Assignment: Peer Engagement Forum Paper

10 Points Deducted

A minimum of two peer-reviewed scholarly sources, current within five years, are integrated to support the primary (initial) posting.
NR504 Week 6 Peer Engagement Forum Paper
The assignment fails to meet the requirement for quality of literature support.
Length of Primary (initial) and Responsive Postings 0 points Deducted
10 Points Deducted

The following requirements are met:

· The primary (initial) posting is a minimum of 300 words and does not exceed 500 words in length (not including the reference list)

· Responsive postings are each a minimum of 100 words and do not exceed 300 words in length (not including any reference listing, should one be included)

NR504 Week 6 Assignment: Peer Engagement Forum Paper The assignment fails to meet one or more of the requirements noted for length of postings.
Timeliness of Forum Participation 0 Points Deducted
10 Points Deducted

The following participation guidelines are met:

· Primary (initial) posting is made before Wednesday 11:59 pm MT during the assigned week

· Minimum of two responsive postings are made before Sunday 11:59 pm MT at the end of the assigned week

· Responds by Sunday 11:59 pm MT to all questions directed specifically to the student. Students are required to address questions posed before Saturday 11:59 pm MT directly to them.

NR504 Week 6 Assignment: Peer Engagement Forum Paper The assignment fails to meet one or more of the requirements for participation.

Format Subtotal _____of 20 points
Assignment Total Points Earned _____of 100 Points

NR504 Week 6 Assignment: Peer Engagement Forum Paper

https://onlinenursingowl.com/2020/08/13/assignment-peer-engagement-forum-paper/

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – NR504 Week 6 Assignment

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

• Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

• Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

• APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

• Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

• LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. NR504 Week 6 Assignment

• Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

• Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours. NR504 Week 6 Assignment

• Guarantee

• Zero Plagiarism
• On-time delivery
• A-Grade Papers
• Free Revision
• 24/7 Support
• 100% Confidentiality
• Professional Writers

• Services Offered

• Custom paper writing
• Question and answers
• Essay paper writing
• Editing and proofreading
• Plagiarism removal services
• Multiple answer questions

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, affordable, plagiarism-free paper