NR544 Week 3: Quality Improvement Model Application

NR544 Week 3: Quality Improvement Model Application

NR544 Week 3: Quality Improvement Model Application

NR544 Week 3: Quality Improvement Model Application

The purpose of this assignment is to (a) provide examples of a quality improvement initiative or patient safety issue in any healthcare delivery setting, (b) explore the contributing factors for this adverse medical outcome, (c) apply quality improvement theories and philosophies to a healthcare management project, (d) demonstrate an understanding of quality improvement tools by correctly choosing and using them in specific cases, and (e) recognize the extent of problems of patient safety in medical care.

Assignment Criteria for the Paper

1.    Identify any existing quality concern or an existing patient safety issue and provide the rationale for choosing this issue.

2.    Explain the background and scope of the problem.

3.    Analyze the issue based on the appropriate quality philosophy.

4.    Identify the regulatory guidelines, internal and/or external benchmarks, or evidence-based practice standards surrounding the issue—explain what that expectation is and why.

5.   Use the appropriate quality improvement tools to improve the quality outcome.

6.   Describe how you could or will get involved in this initiative to make a difference and move it forward to enactment.

7.    Summarize the content in concluding statements.

8.    The body of the scholarly paper is to be 4 pages in length, excluding title and reference pages.

9.    Grammar, spelling, punctuation, references, and citations are consistent with formal academic writing and APA format as expressed in the current edition.

10.  Include a minimum of four references published within the past 5 years, not including your textbook. References may include scholarly websites of organizations or government agencies and must be presented using APA current edition format for electronic media. Quality Improvement Nursing Assignment

Category

Points

%

Description

Introduction and quality concern

Identify a quality issue/patient safety issue and provide a rationale.

Background and scope of the problem

Analyze the problem from a literature review and a practical point of view.

Goals of improvement

Identify three goals to improve the problem.

Quality philosophy application: Using a quality model, analyze the patient safety concern and the intervention to bridge the gaps.

Identification of the regulatory guidelines and internal/external benchmarks or EBP standards for this issue

Discuss all related factors to this problem and explain what the expectation is and why.

Quality process tool and improvement recommendation

Apply appropriate quality improvement tools to improve the quality outcome; provide illustrations for all tools used (flowchart, gap analysis, root cause analysis, etc.). Choose at least two tools for implementation – NR544 Week 3: Quality Improvement Model Application

Provide summary and concluding statements.

APA style

Text, title page, and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA current edition format.

Scholarly references: Paper is 4 pages in length, excluding the cover and reference pages. References include a minimum of 4 scholarly references, excluding the course text.

Grammar and spelling: Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work.

 

NR544 Week 3: Quality Improvement Model Application

Guidelines With Scoring Rubric

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to (a) provide examples of a quality improvement initiative or patient safety issue in any healthcare delivery setting, (b) explore the contributing factors for this adverse medical outcome, (c) apply quality improvement theories and philosophies to a healthcare management project, (d) demonstrate an understanding of quality improvement tools by correctly choosing and using them in specific cases, and (e) recognize the extent of problems of patient safety in medical care. Quality Improvement Nursing Assignment

Course Outcomes

Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to do the following.

· Apply frameworks and theories for improving quality of care in various healthcare systems. (CO 1)

· Use critical inquiry to evaluate the design, implementation, and outcomes of quality and safety improvement strategies. (CO 3)

· Advance knowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary for the continuous improvement of quality and safety in healthcare. (CO 5)

Due Date: Submit by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 3.

Total Points Possible: 230

Requirements

Assignment Criteria for the Paper

1. Identify any existing quality concern or an existing patient safety issue and provide the rationale for choosing this issue.

2. Explain the background and scope of the problem.

3. Analyze the issue based on the appropriate quality philosophy.4. Identify the regulatory guidelines, internal and/or external benchmarks, or evidence-based practice standards surrounding the issue—explain what that expectation is and why.

5. Use the appropriate quality improvement tools to improve the quality outcome.

6. Describe how you could or will get involved in this initiative to make a difference and move it forward to enactment.
 
7. Summarize the content in concluding statements.
 
8. The body of the scholarly paper is to be 3–5 pages in length excluding title and reference pages.
 
9. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, references, and citations are consistent with formal academic writing and APA format as expressed in the current edition.
 

10. Include a minimum of four references published within the past 5 years, not including your textbook. References may include scholarly websites of organizations or government agencies and must be presented using APA current edition format for electronic media. NR544 Week 3: Quality Improvement Model Application

Preparing the paper

Category Points % Description
Introduction and quality concern 25 11% Identify a quality issue/patient safety issue and provide a rationale.
Background and scope of the problem 20 9% Analyze the problem from a literature review and a practical point of view.
Goals of improvement 20 9% Identify three goals to improve the problem.
Quality philosophy application 35 15% Using a quality model, analyze the patient safety concern and the intervention to bridge the gaps.
Identification of the regulatory guidelines and internal/external benchmarks or EBP standards for this issue 40 17% Discuss all related factors to this problem and explain what the expectation is and why.
Quality process tool and improvement recommendation 40 17% Apply appropriate quality improvement tools to improve the quality outcome; provide illustrations for all tools used (flowchart, gap analysis, root cause analysis, etc.). Choose at least two tools for implementation.
Conclusion 15 7% Provide summary and concluding statements.
APA style 10 4% Text, title page, and reference page(s) are completely consistent with APA current edition format.
Scholarly references 15 7% Paper is 3–5 pages in length, excluding the cover and reference pages. References include a minimum of 4 scholarly references, excluding the course text.
Grammar and spelling 10 4% Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work.
Total 230 100% A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

NR544

Grading Rubric

 

Assignment Criteria

Exceptional

(100%)

Outstanding or highest level of performance

Exceeds

(88%)

Very good or high level of performance

Meets

(80%)

Competent or satisfactory level of performance

Needs Improvement

(38%)

Poor or failing level of performance

Developing

(0)

Unsatisfactory level of performance

Content

Possible Points = 195 Points

 

Introduction and quality concern

25 Points 20 Points 16 Points 10 Points 0 Points
  Introduction offers broad overview of topic narrowing to key concepts to be presented. Purpose statement is clear. All elements provided. Introduction includes issue and purpose. Statement present but may lack a key component. Introduction of topic issue lacks occasional important element or specificity. One element provided. Introduction of topic issue has multiple instances of inaccuracies. None of the required elements present or no introduction. Introduction is not present.
Background and scope of the problem 20 Points 18 Points 16 Points 8 Points 0 Points
  Succinctly defines problem and population with significant demographics; describes depth of the problem and numbers affected. Defines problem, some elements may not be fully developed; rare inaccuracy. Identifies problem with lack of depth and occasional important elements or specificity. Identifies problem with multiple instances of inaccuracies or one or more elements missing. Overview of health problem is not present.
Goals of improvement 20 Points 18 Points 16 Points 8 Points 0 Points
  Comprehensive and realistic benefits to nursing profession presented. Benefits to nursing profession stated with adequate clarity or realism. Benefits to nursing profession stated but lack clarity or realism. Benefits to nursing profession stated but unrealistic. Benefits to nursing profession absent.
Quality philosophy application 35 Points 25 Points 20 Points 15 Points 0 Points
  Application to problem/concern is fully developed and comprehensive. Application to problem/concern is adequately present or model mostly linked to project. Application to problem/concern is minimally present or model not always linked to project. Model is not linked to project. Application to problem/concern is absent.
Identify regulatory guidelines, internal/external benchmarks and EBP standards 40 Points 32 Points 25 Points 15 Points 0 Points
  Able to discuss all related factors. Able to discuss all related factors but there are some missing details. Discussed some related factors but there are some that are missing. Discussion is minimal and most of the factors are missing. No discussion of related factors.
  40 Points 32 Points 25 Points 15 Points 0 Points
Improvement process and recommendations

Decision recommendation thoroughly discussed.

Discusses at least two tools.

Decision recommendation developed with rare inaccuracies;

Discusses at least one tool. NR544 Week 3: Quality Improvement Model Application

Discussion of the decision recommendation lacks occasional important elements or specificity but

one tool is discussed.

Discussion of the decision recommendation has multiple instances of inaccuracies and/or is vague.

One tool discussed.

 

Discussion of the decision recommendation is absent.

No tools discussed.

 

Conclusion 15 Points 12 Points 8 Points 4 Points 0 Points
  Provides distinct summary with concluding statements regarding the future direction and focus of the project; reflects key elements of the paper. Provides distinct summary with concluding statements regarding the future direction and focus of the project; does not summarize key elements of the paper. Provides distinct summary with no concluding statements; no summarization of key elements of the paper. No distinct summary; concluding statements found at the end in the general body of the paper. No distinct summary or conclusion provided.

Content Subtotal _____ of 195 Points

 

 

Format

Possible Points = 35 Points

APA 10 Points 8 Points 6 Points 4 Points 0 Points
  There are no APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s). There are 1–2 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s). There are 3–4 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s). There are 5 APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s). There are 6 or more APA format errors in the text, title page, and/or reference page(s).
Scholarly 15 Points 12 Points 8 Points 4 Points 0 Points
  The table provided is utilized. References include 2 or more scholarly resources, excluding the course text, and may include scholarly websites. The table provided is utilized. References include a minimum of 2 scholarly resources, excluding course text. One of the references utilized was not scholarly.

The table provided is not utilized and/or references contain a minimum of 2 resources, excluding course text. One or more references utilized is not a scholarly resource.

 

The table provided is not utilized and/or references utilized are not scholarly and/or fewer than 2 resources were utilized. Only one resource was utilized.
Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work. 10 Points 8 Points 6 Points 4 Points 0 Points
  Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work with no exceptions. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work with 1–2 exceptions. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work with 3–4 exceptions. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are not followed with errors. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are not followed with 6 or more errors.

Format Subtotal _____ of 35 Points

 

Total Points _____ of 230 Points

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Who we are

We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched for a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help with your coursework.

Do you handle any type of coursework?

Yes. We have posted our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication. NR544 Week 3: Quality Improvement Model Application

Is it hard to Place an Order?

  • 1. Click on “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
  • 2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
  • 3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
  • 4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
  • 5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – NR544 Week 3: Quality Improvement Model Application

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. NR544 Week 3: Quality Improvement Model Application

  • Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

  • Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. NR544 Week 3: Quality Improvement Model Application

  • APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

  • Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. NR544 Week 3: Quality Improvement Model Application

  • LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. NR544 Week 3: Quality Improvement Model Application

  • Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

  • Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours. NR544 Week 3: Quality Improvement Model Application

  • GuaranteeNR544 Week 3: Quality Improvement Model Application

  • Zero Plagiarism
  • On-time delivery
  • A-Grade Papers
  • Free Revision
  • 24/7 Support
  • 100% Confidentiality
  • Professional Writers

  • Services Offered

  • Custom paper writing
  • Question and answers
  • Essay paper writing
  • Editing and proofreading
  • Plagiarism removal services
  • Multiple answer questions

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. NR544 Week 3: Quality Improvement Model Application

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

NEED HELP WITH YOUR NURSING ASSIGNMENTS ?

We are dedicated to delivering high quality nursing papers that adhere to the provided instructions, are adequately referenced with the latest scholarly knowledge,

Timely Delivery

Respecting your time and needs, we complete and deliver your orders within the specified timeframe.

Highly skilled writers

We employ experienced and qualified PhD and MD writers able to deal with any types of academic papers

100% unique content

Thorough research and the best academic writing practices ensure complete originality and high quality of every paper we deliver.

Order Now