NURS 6050 Week 10 Assignment Assessing a Healthcare Program

NURS 6050 Module 05 Week 10 Assignment Assessing a Healthcare Program Worksheet Sample Papers Included

NURS 6050 Module 05 Week 10 Assignment Assessing a Healthcare Program

Assignment: Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation

Program/policy evaluation is a valuable tool that can help strengthen the quality of programs/policies and improve outcomes for the populations they serve. Program/policy evaluation answers basic questions about program/policy effectiveness. It involves collecting and analyzing information about program/policy activities, characteristics, and outcomes. This information can be used to ultimately improve program services or policy initiatives.

Nurses can play a very important role assessing program/policy evaluation for the same reasons that they can be so important to program/policy design. Nurses bring expertise and patient advocacy that can add significant insight and impact. In this Assignment, you will practice applying this expertise and insight by selecting an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation and reflecting on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program/policy.

To Prepare:

  • Review the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template provided in the Resources.
  • Select an existing healthcare program or policy evaluation or choose one of interest to you.
  • Review community, state, or federal policy evaluation and reflect on the criteria used to measure the effectiveness of the program or policy described.

The Assignment: (2–3 pages)

Based on the program or policy evaluation you selected, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template. Be sure to address the following:

  • Describe the healthcare program or policy outcomes.
  • How was the success of the program or policy measured?
  • How many people were reached by the program or policy selected?
  • How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?
  • At what point in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted?
  • What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?
  • What specific information on unintended consequences was identified?
  • What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.
  • Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?
  • Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?
  • Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after 1 year of implementation.

Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template

NURS 6050 Walden University Week 10 Assessing a Healthcare Program Analysis

NURS 6050 Module 05 Week 10 Assignment Assessing a Healthcare Program Worksheet

Use this document to complete the Module 5 Assessment Assessing a Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation

Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation
Description  

 

 

 
How was the success of the program or policy measured?

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
What specific information on unintended consequences were identified?  
What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples. NURS 6050 Week 10 Assignment  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after one year of implementation.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
General Notes/Comments  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NURS 6050 Week 10 Assignment

By Day 7 of Week 10

Submit your completed healthcare program/policy evaluation analysis.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK10Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 10 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 10 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK10Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
  • Due to the nature of this assignment, your instructor may require more than 5 days to provide you with quality feedback.

 

NURS 6050 Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health – Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Sample Paper

 

Promoting Safe and Stable Families

Name

Walden University

Policy and Advocacy for Improving Population Health

NURS 6050

Date

 

Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis

Promoting Safe and Stable Families

The role of nurses throughout healthcare program and policy evaluation is vital to our role as change agents within our communities. As nurses we participate in the evaluation process every time we go to work, assess our patients, and then partake in delivery of care. If we want to our voices to be heard we must be willing to take our evaluation skills to the next level. We must ask ourselves tough questions about whether the healthcare programs we are providing are meeting the needs of patients, their families, and communities. We must evaluate the healthcare program goals and outcomes to help determine whether it remains fiscally responsible and continues to meet a need in the population it aims to serve. Ultimately, we cannot blindly accept that the presence of a program validates its success. We must be willing and able to take personal action to ensure patients receive the highest quality of healthcare each and every day. The purpose of this paper is to present an evaluation of the Promoting Safe and Stable Families (PSSF) program with respect to it’s background, goals, outcomes, success, costs and related nursing advocacy opportunities.

Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation

 

Promoting Safe and Stable Families (PSSF)

Description

 

The Promoting Safe and Stable Families (PSSF) program, which is more formally known as Title IV-B subpart 2 of the Social Security Act, aims to avoid unnecessary separations between caregivers and their children, protect permanency for children by taking the necessary steps to reunite them with their parents, when possible, or another permanent living situation, and to improve the quality of care and programming services being offered to children and their families to achieve maximum chance for stable families (U.S. Department of Health & Human Services: Children’s Bureau, 2012).

 

The PSSF program has recently had two additional programs added, the Personal Responsibility Education Program (PREP) and abstinence education. The goal of the PREP program is to provide state funding aimed at teen pregnancy prevention, addressing prevalence of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the adolescent population, as well as teaching teens skills to prepare them for adulthood (ie financial responsibility and organization skills). The abstinence education portion provides grants to individual states to promote education to adolescents regarding delaying sexual activity in an effort to further reduce teen pregnancy rates, but also to promote development of healthy relationships and establishment of healthy boundaries in at-risk populations such as homeless teens or those in foster care (United States Department of Health & Human Services, 2018).

 

How was the success of the program or policy measured?

 

 

Success of the PSSF program has been measured by the fact that funding for this program became a mandatory component of the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The PSSF program has been reauthorized multiple times over the past 25 years and continues to be nationally implemented. Congress realized the success of this program, and ultimately the impact it has had on children, adolescents, and their respective families. Congress then began to require a budgetary commitment of mandatory funds toward this program to be awarded at the state level and to Native American tribes within the states who meet minimum requirements for award. To illustrate the success of the program in funding it is important to recognize that in 1994, $60 million was allocated in mandatory financial funding (Casey Family Programs, 2011), and in 2019, $345 million has been allocated (United States Department of Health & Human Services: Administration for Children and Families, 2019).

 

In the state of Colorado, in fiscal year 2016, the following data applied to the measurement of success of PSSF:

· 3,315 individuals were served by family preservation funds

· 3,023 individuals were served by family support funds

· 1,401 individuals were served by time-limited reunification funds

(Colorado Office of Children, Youth, & Families: Division of Child Welfare, 2018, p. 53)

 

How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?

 

 

Funding for PSSF is based on a formula that considers the population of children who receive Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) aka “food stamps” in each state and respective Native American tribe. In order to remain eligible for PSSF funding each state must match 25% of the PSSF award amount in a Maintenance of Effort (MOE) account (State of California Health and Human Services Agency, 2014).

 

While the formula for determination of PSSF funding was not available, nationally one in four children receive SNAP benefits in a given month. This translates into between 20 and 22 million children receiving SNAP benefits in a given year. While not all of these children will need PSSF funding dollars these are the figures for which the state funding is determined (Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 2017).

 

What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?

 

 

PSSF funding is determined based on 5-year plans within each state and Native American tribe. Analysis of program outcome data is conducted annually at the individual state level in alignment with the PSSF assurances, which include spending in in alignment with state and federal statutes.

 

Each state and tribe must submit their intended goals with PSSF funding. Each of the submitted plans must take into account collaborative efforts with key stakeholders. Title IV-B requires that PSSF plans be integrated into the state and/or tribal agency’s 5-year Child and Family Services Plan (CFSP) and provide annual updates by June 30th each year. The regional Children’s Bureau offices are responsible for communication and feedback to the respective states or tribes related to the annual reports.

 

What specific information on unintended consequences were identified?

 

 

Unintended consequences that have been identified since this program began in 1993 is that the program which began as a response to the growing number of children in foster care placement has expanded over the last 25 years and has been reauthorized under different legislative acts, most recently the Child and Family Services Improvement and Innovation Act of 2011. At current this program addresses permanency of children, Personal Responsibility Education Program and abstinence education (United States Health & Human Services: Administration for Children and Families, 2015).

 

What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples.

 

 

Stakeholders identified in the evaluation of the PSSF program include

· Department of Human Services in each state and each county

· Native American tribes

· Vulnerable families with children at risk for abuse and/or neglect

· Families with open child protection cases; either court involved or non-court involved

· Foster parents

· Adoptive parents

· Hospitals and clinics

· Physicians and other healthcare providers

· Schools

· Teachers

· Law Enforcement

· Courts

· Community members

All of the stakeholders listed above will benefit from the results of PSSF program evaluation because the results will impact the direction for future grant funding for children and adolescents with regard to foster care, permanency, PREP, and abstinence education.

 

Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not?

 

 

The PSSF program has met it’s intended objectives over multiple years. However, the population it serves is constantly changing and the objectives are fluid based on the legislative source of funding, so the measure of success is a target that is constantly moving and difficult to assess.

Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not?

 

 

This program is already implemented in the state of Colorado and provides funding for valuable resources for children and adolescents within our state.

 

I would recommend implementation of this program because it aims to preserve the structure of families, provide family support to vulnerable families, provide time-limited reunification support, provide skills, guidance, and education for adulthood. Dividing families and removing children from their biological parents changes the heritage of a family forever. The PSSF program provides tools to prevent the division of families whenever possible.

 

Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after one year of implementation.

 

 

In the role of a nurse advocate we can become involved in evaluation of a program via multiple different avenues. For example, nurses can volunteer to participate in the program planning committee that focuses on evaluation of the program one year after implementation. By becoming involved at this level nurses can help to influence discussions regarding needs for modification to the program in order to help make it more successful. Nurses can also participate in program evaluation by contacting legislators who support the program in order to provide a nursing perspective relative to the program.

 

Conclusion

The healthcare program evaluated for the purposes of this paper was the Promoting Safe and Stable Families (PSSF). During the course of research for this paper it was challenging to find all of the data for completion of the above table. The background, data, goals, and outcomes were not presented in a comprehensive way that made evaluation clear and concise. As research carried on it became apparent why being involved in program evaluation in person and in real time is imperative to success of the evaluation process. While evaluation of this program was challenging it was meaningful in that the impact of this program over the last 25 years became obvious. The PSSF program is proof that programs can withstand the test of time as long as modifications can be made along the way to continue to best meet the needs of the target population and take into account the evolving desires of the key stakeholders.

References

Casey Family Programs. (2011). The Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program: Background and Context. Retrieved from http://www.casey.org/media/PromotingSafeandStableFamilies.pdf

Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. (2017). SNAP Helps Millions of Children. Retrieved from https://www.cbpp.org/research/food-assistance/snap-helps-millions-of-children

Colorado Office of Children, Youth, & Families: Division of Child Welfare. (2018). 2018 Annual Progress and Services Report: 2015-19 Child and Family Services Plan. Retrieved from http://co4kids.org/sites/default/files/IM-CW-2017-0018.pdf

State of California Health and Human Services Agency. (2014). Promoting Safe and Stable Families Program. Retrieved from http://www.childsworld.ca.gov/res/OCAP/PSSFFactSheet.pdf

United States Department of Health & Human Services. (2018). Administration for Children and Families (ACF): Mandatory. Retrieved from https://www.hhs.gov/about/budget/fy2018/budget-in-brief/acf/mandatory/index.html#promoting

United States Department of Health & Human Services: Administration for Children and Families. (2019). FY 2019 Justification of Estimates for Appropriations Committees. Retrieved from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/olab/acf_master_cj_acf_final_3_19_0.pdf

United States Health & Human Services: Administration for Children and Families. (2015). Promoting Safe and Stable Families. Retrieved from https://library.childwelfare.gov/cwig/ws/library/docs/capacity/Blob/105742.pdf?r=1&rpp=10&upp=0&w=+NATIVE%28%27recno%3D105742%27%29&m=1

U.S. Department of Health & Human Services: Children’s Bureau. (2012). Promoting Safe and Stable Families: Title IV-B, Subpart 2, of the Social Security Act. Retrieved from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/cb/resource/pssf-title-iv-b-subpart-2-ssa

 

Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template Sample Paper

Healthcare

 

Program/Policy Evaluation

 Evaluation of The Affordable Care Act (ACA)Policy
Description Patient protection and Affordable Health Care Act, also popularly known as ‘Obama Care’ is a health policy that was signed into law by President Barrack Obama on 23rd March, 2010. At the moment, the policy stands out as the most extensive in the United States’ healthcare system since the approval of Medicare and Medicaid in 1965. The impacts of the policy have been vast and wide. The most significant element of the policy is that it provides subsidies which makes healthcare insurance affordable (Blumenthal et Al., 2015). Another aspect of the policy is that it emphasizes on preventive care by improving legislations that govern how the care itself is delivered.
How was the success of the program or policy measured? The success of the ACA policy can only be effectively measured by considering how much it reduces the number of uninsured people and if it improves the quality of care, whose availability will be at a low cost. Its success will also be quantified by reviewing the federal and state budgets
  which will take several tears to be noticeable. Basically, it can be said that the policy has been successful at availing affordable care to millions of Americans. This is because, following its introduction, more than 20million people have been able to access healthcare insurance with more medical coverage. In addition, those where poorly insured get a chance to access quality medical insurance at a relatively low cost.
 

 

How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected?

 Before the implementation of ACA, may people were uninsured due to the loopholes in the public insurance system, and inaccessibility to affordable health insurance. The ACA policy has demonstrated the largest gains in coverage in the history of United States’ healthcare. The policy extended medical coverage to low income earners and provided subsidies to the people below 400% of poverty. For instance, after it was signed in 2010, the number of uninsured elderly people reduced from 44 million in 2013 to 27 million in 2016.
 

 

What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation?

 Evaluation of a healthcare policy involves a thorough activity of gathering, examining, and the use of evidence based data to come up with answers to some fundamental questions arising from the policy. Policy evaluations may be of various types such as process and outcome evaluations, cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness evaluations, and formative and summative evaluations. In terms of cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness, the ACA demands for all insurance companies to scrap off annual and lifetime limits and cover all costs to reduce the unnecessary catastrophic costs for individuals (French et Al., 2016).
   
 

 

What specific information on unintended consequences were identified?

 Healthcare providers continue to utilize several strategies to adapt and remain compliant to the requirements of the ACA policy. However, as the policy continues to take root, it yields to unintended consequences. These include continuity of care whereby different organizations are unable to offer consistent care, which often arises from transferring patients from system to system (Dubois, 2015). Another consequence is the outpatient treatment. The policy advocates for 60% outpatient care and 40% in patient, which is a disadvantage since most patients view hospitals as safer places of in case of adverse reactions, a sense of security that they may not have with outpatient facilities.
What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? The main stakeholders in the ACA policy are patients, insurance companies, healthcare providers, and the government (Weiner et Al., 2017). The patients benefit most from ACA because it minimizes the rise in healthcare costs making it accessible even to low income earners.
Who would benefit  
most from the results  
and reporting of the  
program or policy  
evaluation? Be  
specific and provide  
examples.  
   
Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or  

 

The policy has certainly met its original intent by a considerable percentage. A lot of reforms are evident in the healthcare sector courtesy of the ACA policy. For instance, the number of uninsured people has relatively reduced from 44 million in 2013 to 27 million in 2016
why not?  
Would you recommend implementing this I would recommend implementation of some of the provisions of the ACA policy like improving communication when dealing with low literacy patients. This assist in improving patient care, and satisfaction thus promoting a good public reputation for the institution.
program or policy in  
your place of work?  
Why or why not?  
 

 

Identify at least two

 As a nurse, I would compare the financial input and outcomes in the organizations utilizing the ACA provisions. I would also look at the labor costs to establish if the healthcare facilities incur positive or negative financial impacts. Secondly, I would also have a look at the patient outcomes before and after implementation of ACA policy provisions.
ways that you, as a
nurse advocate,
could become
involved in evaluating
a program or policy

 

 
 

 

after one year of implementation.

  
General Notes/Comments  

 

The ACA policy has generally improved the health sector of the United States in terms of accessibility and affordability. Health facilities are encouraged to continue implementing the provisions of the policy to improve patient care ad satisfaction.

Name: NURS_6050_Module05_Week10_Assignment_Rubric

 

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Program/Policy Evaluation Based on the program or policy evaluation you seelcted, complete the Healthcare Program/Policy Evaluation Analysis Template. Be sure to address the following: ·   Describe the healthcare program or policy outcomes. ·   How was the success of the program or policy measured? ·   How many people were reached by the program or policy selected? How much of an impact was realized with the program or policy selected? ·   At what point in time in program implementation was the program or policy evaluation conducted?

32 (32%) – 35 (35%)

Response clearly and accurately describes in detail the healthcare program or policy outcomes. Response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the success of the program or policy was measured. Response clearly and accurately describes in detail how many people were reached by the program or policy and fully describes the impact of the program or policy. Response clearly and accurately indicates the point at which time the program or policy evaluation was conducted.

28 (28%) – 31 (31%)

Response accurately describes the healthcare program or policy outcomes. Response accurately explains how the success of the program or policy was measured. Response accurately describes how many people were reached by the program or policy and accurately describes the impact of the program or policy. Response accurately indicates the point at which time the program or policy evaluation was conducted.

25 (25%) – 27 (27%)

Description of the healthcare program or policy outcomes is inaccurate or incomplete. Explanation of how the success of the program or policy was measured is inaccurate or incomplete. Description of how many people were reached by the program or policy and the impact is vague or inaccurate. Response vaguely describes the point at which the program or policy evaluation was conducted.

0 (0%) – 24 (24%)

Description of the healthcare program or policy outcomes is inaccurate and incomplete, or is missing. Explanation of how the success of the program or policy was measured is inaccurate and incomplete, or is missing. Description of how many people were reached by the program or policy and the associated impacts is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Response of the point at which time the program or policy was conducted is missing.

Reporting of Program/Policy Evaluations ·   What data was used to conduct the program or policy evaluation? ·   What specific information on unintended consequences was identified? ·   What stakeholders were identified in the evaluation of the program or policy? Who would benefit the most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation? Be specific and provide examples. ·   Did the program or policy meet the original intent and objectives? Why or why not? ·   Would you recommend implementing this program or policy in your place of work? Why or why not? ·   Identify at least two ways that you, as a nurse advocate, could become involved in evaluating a program or policy after 1 year of implementation.

45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Response clearly and accurately identifies the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation. Response clearly and thoroughly explains in detail specific information on outcomes and unintended consequences identified through the program or policy evaluation. Response clearly and accurately explains in detail the stakeholders involved in the program or policy evaluation. Response clearly and accurately explains in detail who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation. Response includes a thorough and accurate explanation of whether the program met the original intent and outcomes, including an accurate and detailed explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not. Response includes a thorough and accurate explanation of whether the program should be implemented, including an accurate and detailed explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not.

40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Response accurately identifies the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation. Response explains in detail specific information on outcomes and unintended consequences identified through the program or policy evaluation. Response explains in detail the stakeholders involved in the program or policy evaluation. Response explains who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation. Response includes an accurate explanation of whether the program met the original intent and outcomes, including an accurate explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not. Response includes an accurate explanation of whether the program should be implemented, including an accurate explanation of the reasons supporting why or why not.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Response vaguely or inaccurately identifies the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation. Explanation of specific information on outcomes and unintended consequences identified through the program or policy evaluation is vague or incomplete. Explanation of the stakeholders involved in the program or policy evaluation is vague or inaccurate. Explanation of who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation is vague or inaccurate. Explanation of whether the program/policy met the original intent and outcomes and the reasons why or why not is incomplete or inaccurate. Explanation of whether the program or policy should be implemented, and the reasons why or why not, is incomplete or inaccurate.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Identification of the data used to conduct the program or policy evaluation is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Explanation of specific information on outcomes and unitended consequences identified through the program or policy evaluation is vague and incomplete, or is missing. Explanation of the stakeholders involved in the program or policy evaluation is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Explanation of who would benefit most from the results and reporting of the program or policy evaluation is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Explanation of whether the program or policy met the original intent and outcomes and the reasons why or why not is incomplete and inaccurate, or is missing. Explanation of whether the program or policy should be implemented, and the reasons why or why not, is incomplete and inaccurate, or is missing.

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_6050_Module05_Week10_Assignment_Rubric

Exit

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Who We Are 

We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched for a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help with your coursework.

Do you handle any type of coursework?

Yes. We have posted our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication.

Is it hard to Place an Order?

  • 1. Click on “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
  • 2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
  • 3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
  • 4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
  • 5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS-NURS 6050 Module 05 Week 10 Assignment Assessing a Healthcare Program

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

  • Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

  • Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

  • APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

  • Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

  • LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score. NURS 6050 Module 05 Week 10 Assignment Assessing a Healthcare Program

  • Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

  • Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

  • Guarantee
    NURS 6050 Module 05 Week 10 Assignment Assessing a Healthcare Program
    NURS 6050 Module 05 Week 10 Assignment Assessing a Healthcare Program

  • Zero Plagiarism
  • On-time delivery
  • A-Grade Papers
  • Free Revision
  • 24/7 Support
  • 100% Confidentiality
  • Professional Writers

  • Services Offered

  • Custom paper writing
  • Question and answers
  • Essay paper writing
  • Editing and proofreading
  • Plagiarism removal services
  • Multiple answer questions

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS Week 10 Assignment Assessing a Healthcare Program

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. NURS 6050 Module 05 Week 10 Assignment Assessing a Healthcare Program

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

NEED HELP WITH YOUR NURSING ASSIGNMENTS ?

We are dedicated to delivering high quality nursing papers that adhere to the provided instructions, are adequately referenced with the latest scholarly knowledge,

Timely Delivery

Respecting your time and needs, we complete and deliver your orders within the specified timeframe.

Highly skilled writers

We employ experienced and qualified PhD and MD writers able to deal with any types of academic papers

100% unique content

Thorough research and the best academic writing practices ensure complete originality and high quality of every paper we deliver.

Order Now