NURS 6050 Walden University Week 3 Politics and the Patient Protection Paper Completed/Solved Sample Included
ORDER an A++ paper from our Erudite WRITERS: NURS 6050 Week 3 Politics and the Patient Protection
NURS-6050, week 3 discussion. Politics and the patient protection and affordable care act
Politics, patient protection and Affordable Care Act
Efforts to repeal or replace Affordable Care Act (ACA) have been subject of much political debate that have the subtle connotation of selfishness by politicians with a view to maximizing voter support. In fact, it is not uncommon for factual information to be misrepresented with the intention of swaying public opinion and gaining ‘political mileage’ (Feldstein, 2006). NURS-6050, week 3 discussion. Politics and the patient protection and affordable care act
A review of ACA and the reasons for its enactment in 2010 shows that it…
Discussion – Week 3 Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Regardless of political affiliation, individuals often grow concerned when considering perceived competing interests of government and their impact on topics of interest to them. The realm of healthcare is no different. Some people feel that local, state, and federal policies and legislation can be either helped or hindered by interests other than the benefit to society.
The suppliers of legislative benefits are legislators, and their primary goal is to be re-elected. Thus, legislators need to maximize their chances for re-election, which requires political support. Legislators are assumed to be rational and to make cost-benefit calculations when faced with demands for legislation. However, the legislator’s cost-benefit calculations are not the cost-benefits to society of enacting particular legislation. Instead, the benefits are the additional political support the legislator would receive from supporting legislation and the lost political support they would incur as a result of their action. When the benefit to legislators (positive political support) exceeds their costs (negative political support) they will support legislation. (page 27) NURS-6050, week 3 discussion. Politics and the patient protection and affordable care act
Source: Feldstein, P. (2006). The politics of health legislation: An economic perspective (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press.
To Prepare:
Review the Resources and reflect on efforts to repeal/replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA).
Consider who benefits the most when policy is developed and in the context of policy implementation.
By Day 3 of Week 3
Post an explanation for how you think the cost-benefit analysis in the statement from page 27 of Feldstein (2006) affected efforts to repeal/replace the ACA. Then, explain how analyses such as the one portrayed by the Feldstein statement may affect decisions by legislative leaders in recommending or positioning national policies (e.g., Congress’ decisions impacting Medicare or Medicaid).
By Day 6 of Week 3
Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days by expanding on their explanation and providing an example that supports their explanation or respectfully challenging their explanation and providing an example.
Click on the Reply button below to reveal the textbox for entering your message. Then click on the Submit button to post your message. NURS-6050, week 3 discussion. Politics and the patient protection and affordable care act
*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.
Politics, patient protection and Affordable Care Act
Name
Institution
Politics, patient protection and Affordable Care Act
Efforts to repeal or replace Affordable Care Act (ACA) have been subject of much political debate that have the subtle connotation of selfishness by politicians with a view to maximizing voter support. In fact, it is not uncommon for factual information to be misrepresented with the intention of swaying public opinion and gaining ‘political mileage’ (Feldstein, 2006).
A review of ACA and the reasons for its enactment in 2010 shows that it was intended to expand access to care, make coverage more affordable, and reduce the number of uninsured Americans. To realize these objectives, the legislation created new marketplaces where insurers offer polices directly to persons without employer coverage, and expanded Medicaid eligibility. Over the course of the nine years that ACA has been operational, health insurance coverage has increased by 20 million, while 24 million Americans have enjoyed free and subsidized medical care through expansions to Medicaid and marketplace tax credits.
Despite the major successes reported from ACA, the legislation faces strong political debate over its repeal and replacement. The political debate has presented four proposals. The first proposal is to make no changes to ACA and maintain the status quo. This proposal would continue increasing the federal deficit and health insurance coverage thus making it unappealing to voters concerned with federal deficit and appealing to voters who are only able to get health insurance coverage through ACA (Rand Corporation, 2019). NURS-6050, week 3 discussion. Politics and the patient protection and affordable care act
The second proposal is to repeal ACA while replacing it through either adopting the American Health Security Act that was introduced by Senator Bernie Sanders in 2011, or the Health Insurance Solution. This proposal is based on the fact of financial estimates that health care spending would increase to $1 trillion, a concern for the blooming government spending. The proposal is anticipated to reduce federal expenditure by $40 billion and national health care expenditure by $211 billion relative to ACA. However, the savings would be accompanied by uninsured persons increasing by 9 million Americans. This proposal appeals to voters who are concerned by the blooming government expenditures but who also support the ideals presented in ACA. Through adopting the proposal, they are able to reduce tax burden, and reduce the guilt linked to denying others health insurance coverage since they would argue that most Americans have coverage and only a minority are not covered. In presenting this proposal, politicians would receive support from persons concerned about the tax burden, but not from the 9 million Americans who will lack insurance coverage (Rand Corporation, 2019).
The third proposal is to repeal ACA without replacement. This proposal is anticipated to allow the government save on ACA expenditure, a figure of close to $1 trillion that would then be allocated towards other government endeavors. Although this proposal would appeal to taxpayers, especially the high income earnings who feel particularly burdened, it would increase insurance prices by 8% and deny more than 12 million Americans access to health care. The implication is that the proposal would appeal to voters who are able to access healthcare without ACA (increasing the politician’s popularity among them), but would not appeal to the voters who cannot health care without ACA (reducing the politician’s popularity among them) (Rand Corporation, 2019).
The fourth proposal is to replace ACA with a single payer approach (the American Health Care Act – AHCA). AHCA proposes to make significant changes to ACA to include repealing mandates, introducing continuous coverage, change the age-based rate banding, and replacing income-based subsidies with fixed age-based subsidies. Applying this proposal would initially increase federal deficit by $38 million before reducing it by $5 billion 6 years later, and reduce insurance enrollment by 14 million Americans. This proposal would appeal to persons concerned with federal deficits but not-appeal to the 14 million Americans who would lack insurance coverage. This implies that the politicians who make this proposal would receive support from voters concerned with federal deficit and receive condemnation from voters who would lack insurance coverage (Rand Corporation, 2019).
One must accept that political decisions are typically guided by voter expectations. In addition, one must acknowledge that the debate surrounding ACA is polarized because of voter expectations with politicians tending to make proposals that appeal to the majority of voters in their constituents. Overall, voters’ expectations affect decisions by legislative leaders in recommending and positioning national policies as evidenced by the political debates about ACA. NURS-6050, week 3 discussion. Politics and the patient protection and affordable care act
References
Feldstein, P. (2006). The politics of health legislation: An economic perspective (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press.
Rand Corporation (2019). The Future of U.S. Health Care: Replace or Revise the Affordable Care Act? Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/health-care/key-topics/health-policy/in-depth.html
NURS-6050, week 3 discussion. Politics and the patient protection and affordable care act
Description
Respond to your colleagues* by expanding on their explanation and providing an example that supports their explanation or respectfully challenging their explanation and providing an example.
– I would like to respond my classmate post to my discussion. Can you please help with this. Also very important to add 3 references. Thank you very much!! NURS 6050 Walden University Week 3 Politics and the Patient Protection Paper
-You will see my Discussion then you will see what she posted to my discussion and now i would like to respond back to her.
================================================================================
My post for Discussion # week 3
Lenick Bermudez Beltran
RE: Discussion – Week 3
Politics and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
The divisive politics and polarization have made it difficult for American leaders to rethink about the much-anticipated reforms in healthcare sector. There are those arguing that the current affordable healthcare program under the Affordable Care Act is economical. From a cost benefit analysis approach, for a program to be economical, the benefits must be high compared to the amount incurred in the implementation of the program (Milstead & Short, 2019). The Act makes it possible for most of the citizens to access healthcare services and, therefore, repealing it may make legislators lose political support.
The politics around the affordable healthcare Act is that if it is repealed, some political leaders fear that many people will lose the insurance cover (Hagan et al., 2017). There is also fear that the repeal of the Act will result in a massive loss of jobs with the reduction of people who have access to the insurance cover. For instance, if the Act is repealed, many people who acquired their insurance coverage under the affordable healthcare program will automatically lose them. Millions of low-income earners who got covered under the Medicaid program will lose them, and consequently, many Americans will end up uninsured. This will affect their ability to access and afford healthcare services.
From Feldstein’s point of view, it is unlikely that the politicians will support the repeal of the Affordable care Act. This is based on the fact that from a cost-benefit analysis, the politicians are only likely to support a legislative agender that has more beneficial to them (Feldstein, 2006). On this basis, they are not likely to repeal the Affordable Care Act because it will not be beneficial to the Americans. This is reflected by the fact that despite the efforts by President Trump’s efforts to have the Act repealed, he has not been succeeded. For instance, even when the republics were in the control of the Congress, they could not Marshall the necessary support for the votes required to repeal the law. The coat benefits (political support), in this case, outweigh the cost (losing political support). Therefore, they are not likely to support the repeal.
References
Feldstein, P. (2006). The politics of health legislation: An economic perspective. Chicago, IL: Health Administration Press.
Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Taylor, D., Olshansky, E. F., Woods, N. F., Johnson-Mallard, V., Safriet, B. J., & Hagan, T. (2017). Corrigendum to position statement: Political interference in sexual and reproductive health research and health professional education [Nursing Outlook 65/2 (2017) 242–245]. Nursing Outlook, 65(3), 346-350.
==============================================================================================
Response from my classmate to my post:
Liliana Torres
Hi Lenick,
The fact that if the Affordable Care Act is repealed will cause many people to lose insurance is troubling. The United States will have up to 21 million individuals uninsured (Abelson, Goodnough & Pear, 2019). In addition to, Abelson, Goodnough and Pear state “without the A.C.A, the cost of care for people who cannot pay for it could increase as much as $50.2 billion…Hospitals and other medical providers will incur losses” (2019). Therefore, one of the Affordable Care Act’s goal was to promote primary care and preventative care which will reduce visits to the emergency department or reduce worsening chronic illnesses. According to Araujo’s Average Health Care Costs and Ways to Save, she states “health care spending is projected to grow at an average rat3e of 5.5% per year between 2018 and 2027” (2019). If the Affordable Care Act is repealed and an uninsured visit the emergency department without paying their bill it would lead to money loss in health care. “Once a patient declared bankruptcy [for medical bills], the hospital had to declare a loss on any unpaid treatment” (Amadeo, 2019). Furthermore, in Amadeo’s article, she concludes “Obamacare reduced the number of bankruptcy filings” (2019), which is a benefit to the economy and Americans.
References
Abelson, R., Goodnough, A. & Pear, R. (2019). What happens if Obamacare is struck down?. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/26/health/obamacare-trump-health.html
Amadeo, K. (2019). Benefits of Obamacare-What you will and won’t lose if Obamacare is replaced. Retrieved from https://www.thebalance.com/benefits-of-obamacare-advantages-of-the-aca-3306066
Araujo, M. (2019). Average health care costs and ways to save-Be prepared by understanding what you might pay. Retrieved from https://www.thebalance.com/healthcare-costs-3306068
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS
Who We Are
We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched for a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help with your coursework.
Do you handle any type of coursework?
Yes. We have posted our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication.
Is it hard to Place an Order?
- 1. Click on “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
- 2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
- 3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
- 4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
- 5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.
SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS
We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.
- Discussion Questions (DQ)
Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
- Weekly Participation
Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week. NURS 6050 Walden University Week 3 Politics and the Patient Protection Paper
- APA Format and Writing Quality
Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
- Use of Direct Quotes
I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. NURS 6050 Walden University Week 3 Politics and the Patient Protection Paper
- LopesWrite Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
- Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
- Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
- Guarantee
NURS 6050 Walden University Week 3 Politics and the Patient Protection Paper
- Zero Plagiarism
- On-time delivery
- A-Grade Papers
- Free Revision
- 24/7 Support
- 100% Confidentiality
- Professional Writers
- Services Offered
- Custom paper writing
- Question and answers
- Essay paper writing
- Editing and proofreading
- Plagiarism removal services
- Multiple answer questions
We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. NURS 6050 Walden University Week 3 Politics and the Patient Protection Paper
Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper
NEED HELP WITH YOUR NURSING ASSIGNMENTS ?
We are dedicated to delivering high quality nursing papers that adhere to the provided instructions, are adequately referenced with the latest scholarly knowledge,
Timely Delivery
Respecting your time and needs, we complete and deliver your orders within the specified timeframe.
Highly skilled writers
We employ experienced and qualified PhD and MD writers able to deal with any types of academic papers