NURS 6052 Week 3 Discussion – Summary of Article

NURS 6052 Week 3 Discussion – Summary of Article

NURS 6052 Week 3 Discussion – Summary of Article (Walden)

NURS 6052 Week 3 Discussion – Summary of Article

Description

Summary of Article

In 2015, Alaviani, Khosravan, Alami, and Moshki wrote an interesting article concerning the effects of loneliness on senior women. The article concerns a study they performed using

Value of Research Based on an Established Theory

Pender’s Health Promotion Model is comparable to the nursing process of ADPIE. As a nurse, …

NURS 6052 Week 3 Discussion – Summary of Article. NURS 6052 Week 3 Discussion – Summary of Article

CLICK HERE TO ORDER YOUR NURS 6052 Week 3 Discussion – Summary of Article ASSIGNMENT

NURS 6052 Week 3 Response (Walden)

Description

Good day,

Thank you for your interesting discussion post. Your discussion on quality sleep and cardiac patients echoes an experience in CV-ICU/PACU a few years ago. The unit manager implemented

RESPONSE 2, WEEK3

Good day, 

Thank you for your contribution to our discussion. To be honest, this nurse looked a little into Roy’s Adaptation Model and found the terminology confusing, and not very intuitive. So it was …

NURS 6052 Week 4 Discussion (Walden)

Description

Health-Related Case Involving Ethics

The case to be followed involves a 17-year-old female, Cassandra C., diagnosed with

Multiple Ethical Issues

The Clash of Conflicts

Sad Conclusion

NURS 6052 Week 4 Reply (Walden)

Description

Good day,

Thank you for your interesting post. This nurse had read about obtaining a Certificate of Confidentiality in extremely sensitive cases involving vulnerable populations but had not heard …

NURS 6052 Week 5 Project (Walden)

Description

Serial Troponins: A Literature Review

NURS-6052:Essential of Evidence –Based Practice

Literature Review

PICOT question: Will MI patients admitted to ICU who have serial troponins drawn as per American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines, compared to individual doctor’s orders, have better outcomes during the first week’s hospital stay? NURS 6052 Week 3 Discussion – Summary of Article

Introduction

Literature Review: Finding and Critiquing Evidence

Summary of Evidence

NURS 6052 Week 5 Reply (Walden)

Description

RESPONSE 1 WEEK 5

Good day,

Thank you for discussing such an interesting topic. This nurse is also a Marine veteran, and have seen firsthand the damage PTSD can cause. It is a shame the studies you mentioned did not …

RESPONSE 2 WEEK 5 posted fri

Good day,

Thank you for your interesting post. As a veteran, this nurse has a big interest in the topics you have chosen. It is too bad your first study had such a small sample size, it would have …

NURS 6052 Week 6 Discussion (Walden)

Description

Effectiveness of an Aspiration Risk-Reduction Protocol

This discussion will be a review on the validity of the article written by Metheny, Davis-Jackson, and Stewart and ways to strengthen it.

Statistical Conclusion Validity

Internal Validity

Construct Validity

External Validity

Changes Suggested

Not Considering Validity

NURS 6052 Week 6 Assignment (Walden)

Description

Critique Template for a Qualitative Study

NURS 5052/NURS 6052

Week 6 Assignment: Application: Critiquing Quantitative, Qualitative, or Mixed Methods Studies (due by Day 7 of Week 7)

What is a critique? Simply stated, a critique is a critical analysis undertaken for some purpose. Nurses critique research for three main reasons: to improve their practice, to broaden their understanding, and to provide a base for the conduct of a study. 

When the purpose is to improve practice, nurses must give special consideration to questions such as these:

• Are the research findings appropriate to my practice setting and situation?  
• What further research or pilot studies need to be done, if any, before incorporating findings into practice to assure both safety and effectiveness? 
• How might a proposed change in practice trigger changes in other aspects of practice?

To help you synthesize your learning throughout this course and prepare you to utilize research in your practice, you will be critiquing a qualitativequantitative, or mixed-methods research study of your choice. 

If the article is unavailable in a full-text version through the Walden University Library, you must e-mail the article as a PDF or Word attachment to your Instructor. NURS 6052 Course Discussions and Assignments

KINDLY ORDER NOW FOR A CUSTOM-WRITTEN AND PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER

NURS 6052 Week 6 Reply (Walden)

Description

RESPONSE 1 WEEK 6

Good day,

Thank you for your contribution to this week’s discussion. This nurse completely agrees with you when you stated that validity is essential to research studies. While investigating validity, …

NURS 6052 Week 7 Assignment (Walden)

Description

Critique of Qualitative and Quantitative Studies

Walden University

Essentials of Evidenced-Based Practice

NURS 6052-

Critique of Qualitative and Quantitative Studies

This paper will focus on comparing the advantages and disadvantages of two different research methods. Specifically, the quantitative study will be a 2014 article by Nielsen et al. titled

Quantitative Research

Qualitative Research

Qualitative Research as Real Science

NURS 6052 Week 7 Response (Walden)

Description

RESPONSE 1 WEEK 7

Good day,

​Thank you for your contribution to this week’s discussion. Before this week’s discussion, this nurse automatically considered quantitative studies as superior to qualitative ones. So when …

RESPONSE 2 WEEK 7

Good day, 

Thank you for your contribution to our discussion. You bring up a very sensitive issue, and that is children in research. This nurse has a soft spot when it comes to kids. …

NURS 6052 Week 8 Discussion (Walden)

Description

Satisfaction Survey

​This paper will discuss the implementation of a quantitative satisfaction survey on a hospital that averages 10,000 patients per year. This survey will utilize convenience sampling of

Survey:

Thank you for allowing us the privilege of assisting you with your healthcare needs. Your opinion is important to us, and we want to know how you felt about your recent visit to our …

NURS 6052 Week 8 Response (Walden)

Description

6052W8Resp

RESPONSE 1 WEEK 8

​Good day,

Thank you for your contribution to our week’s discussion. Your combination of closed-ended and open-ended question is a great way to broaden the type of data obtained. Closed-ended …

RESPONSE 2 WEEK 8

Good day,

Thank you for your contribution to this week’s discussion. Your comments on incentives to increase survey response were intriguing. This nurse decided to do some research on the value of …

NURS 6052 Week 9 Discussion (Walden)

Description

Qualitative Article

​This discussion will be based on the 2015 article by Iccha Basnyat Structural Violence in Health Care. The author of this article defines structural violence as societal limitations to access

Appropriateness of Design

Polit and Beck defined thematic narrative analysis as the researcher keeping each participant’s story as whole without fragmenting it (2017). Basnyat specifically addressed following that …

Utilizing a Qualitative Design for the Same Study

As Dr. Mauk stated in this week’s media presentation, qualitative research offers a “richness” in data that is not easily obtained through quantification. This study found themes on how sex …

NURS 6052 Week 9 Reply (Walden)

Description

RESPONSE 1 WEEK 9

Good day

Thank you for your interesting summary of qualitative data analysis. Since it was something we had already been taught this semester, did you feel it adequately summaries what we learned on

RESPONSE 2 WEEK 9

Good day,

​Thank you for your contribution to this week’s discussion. In reading your summary on multivariate statistics, I was reminded of some tests that were discussed in chapter 17 on …

NURS 6052 Week 10 Project (Walden)

Description

Course Project on Drawing Seral Troponins

Walden University

Essentials of Evidenced-Based Practice

NURS 6052

Identification of Research Problem

Summary of Area of Interest

According to the American Heart Association (AHA), heart disease kills over 350,000 people in the United States per year, is the number one cause of death, and effects one person 

Identification of Problem

The AHA 2014 guidelines recommend troponin to be drawn when patients first present 

Significance for Nursing Practice

According to the American Nurses Association (ANA) 2014 Code of Ethics, nurses have 

5 Questions

Question 1: What are the current orders each doctor typically orders on MI patients?

Question 2: What is each physician’s rationale for said orders?

Question 3: What barriers exist for doctors to implement EBP?

Question 4: Why are there no protocols in place in the hospital to follow AHA guidelines?

Question 5: How can protocols that adhere to AHA guidelines be implemented in the hospital?

Feasibility of 5 Questions

PICOT Question

PICOT: Will MI patients admitted to ICU who have serial troponins drawn as per AHA 

Literature Review: Finding and Critiquing Evidence

Search terms selected: Troponin, cardiac, markers, myocardial infarction (MI), critical care, diagnosis, serial, acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Summary of Evidence. NURS 6052 Course Discussions and Assignments

NURS 6052 Week 10 Reply (Walden)

Description

6052W10Reply

Good day,

​Thank you for your contribution to our week’s discussion. I found your article discussion very interesting. Particularly your very insightful alternative explanation of the many reasons …

Good day,

​I found your discussion on the treatment of schizoaffective disorder in the emergency room (ER) very interesting. As an ICU nurse, I am not familiar with that medication. …

NURS 6052 Week 11 Reply (Walden)

Description

RESPONSE 1 WEEK 11

Good day,

​Thank you for your interesting contribution to our discussion. I have to agree with Dr. Buck’s point in that even though the newsletters may be convenient and cost-effective, it …

RESPONSE 2 WEEK 11

Good day,

​Thank you for your interesting contribution to this week’s discussion. I found it ...

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS –

Who we are

We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched for a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help with your coursework.

Do you handle any type of coursework?

Yes. We have posted our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill out our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications, and future communication.

Is it hard to Place an Order?

  • 1. Click on “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
  • 2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
  • 3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline, and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
  • 4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
  • 5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – NURS 6052 Week 3 Discussion – Summary of Article

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. NURS 6052 Week 3 Discussion – Summary of Article

  • Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

  • Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

  • APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

  • Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

  • LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

  • Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

  • Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours. NURS 6052 Week 3 Discussion – Summary of Article

  • GuaranteeNURS 6052 Week 3 Discussion - Summary of Article

  • Zero Plagiarism
  • On-time delivery
  • A-Grade Papers
  • Free Revision
  • 24/7 Support
  • 100% Confidentiality
  • Professional Writers

  • Services Offered

  • Custom paper writing
  • Question and answers
  • Essay paper writing
  • Editing and proofreading
  • Plagiarism removal services
  • Multiple answer questions

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium. NURS 6052 Week 3 Discussion – Summary of Article

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper