NURS 6052N Evidence Base

NURS 6052N Evidence Base

In this Assignment, you will identify clinical areas of interest and inquiry and practice searching for research in support of maintaining or changing these practices. You will also analyze this research to compare research methodologies employed.
To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. Keep in mind that the clinical issue you identify for your research will stay the same for the entire course.
  • Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.
  • Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.
  • Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.

Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies
After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:

  • The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.
  • A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.
  • A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.
  • A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.
  • A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies
    Is there a difference between “common practice” and “best practice”?
     
    When you first went to work for your current organization, experienced colleagues may have shared with you details about processes and procedures. Perhaps you even attended an orientation session to brief you on these matters. As a “rookie,” you likely kept the nature of your questions to those with answers that would best help you perform your new role.
     
    Over time and with experience, perhaps you recognized aspects of these processes and procedures that you wanted to question further. This is the realm of clinical inquiry.
     
    Clinical inquiry is the practice of asking questions about clinical practice. To continuously improve patient care, all nurses should consistently use clinical inquiry to question why they are doing something the way they are doing it. Do they know why it is done this way, or is it just because we have always done it this way? Is it a common practice or a best practice?
     
    In this Assignment, you will identify clinical areas of interest and inquiry and practice searching for research in support of maintaining or changing these practices. You will also analyze this research to compare research methodologies employed.
     
    To Prepare:
     
    Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. Keep in mind that the clinical issue you identify for your research will stay the same for the entire course.
    Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.
    Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.
    Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.
    Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies
     
    After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:
     
    The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.
    A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.
    A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.
    A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.
    A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.
     
    Name: NURS_6052_Module02_Week03_Assignment_Rubric
    Grid View
    List View
    Excellent Good Fair Poor
    Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies
     
     
     
    After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:
     
     
    *The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.
     
     
    *A brief statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.
     
     
    *A brief description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.
     
     
    *A brief description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.
    81 (81%) – 90 (90%)
    The response accurately and clearly provides a full citation of each article in APA format.
     
    The responses accurately and thoroughly explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including a detailed explanation of the ethics of research.
     
    The responses accurately and clearly describe the aims of the research.
     
    The responses accurately and clearly describe the research methodology used, and clearly identify the type of methodology used with specific and relevant examples.
     
    The responses accurately and clearly describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including a detailed explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.
     
    The responses provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources related to the selection of articles and two or three course-specific resources.
    72 (72%) – 80 (80%)
    The response accurately provides a citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.
     
    The responses accurately explain the selection of these peer-reviewed articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including an accurate explanation of ethics.
     
    The responses accurately describe the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.
     
    The responses accurately describe the research methodology used and type of methodology used with some examples.
     
    The responses accurately describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including an explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles selected.
     
    The responses provide an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource related to the selection of the peer-reviewed articles. The response integrates at least one outside resource and two or three course-specific resources.
    63 (63%) – 71 (71%)
    The response inaccurately or vaguely provides a citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.
     
    The responses inaccurately or vaguely explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including the explanation of the ethics.
     
    The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the aims of the research of each article.
     
    The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the research methodology used and the type of methodology used, with only some examples.
     
    The responses inaccurately or vaguely describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including the explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.
     
    The responses provided vaguely or inaccurately synthesize outside resources related to the selection of the articles. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the responses provided.
    0 (0%) – 62 (62%)
    The response inaccurately and vaguely provides a citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format or is missing.
     
    The responses inaccurately & vaguely explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue, including the explanation of ethics of research, or they are missing.
     
    The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the aims of the research, or they are missing.
     
    The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the research methodology used, the type of methodology used with no examples present, or they are missing.
     
    The responses inaccurately and vaguely describe the strengths of each of the methodologies used, including the explanation of the reliability and validity of the methodology, or they are missing.
     
    The responses provide a vague and inaccurate synthesis of outside resources related to the selection of the articles and fail to integrate any resources to support the responses provided, or is missing.
    Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:
     
     
    Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria.
    5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
     
    A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria.
    4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated but are brief and not descriptive.
    3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time.
     
    Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.
    0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.
     
    No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion is provided.
    Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:
     
     
     
    Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.
    5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
    Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
     
    A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria.
    4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
    Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
    3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
    Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
    0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
    Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
    Total Points: 100
    Name: NURS_6052_Module02_Week03_Assignment_Rubric
     
    Learning Resources
    Note: To access this module’s required library resources, please click on the link to the Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.
     
    Required Readings
    Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.
     
    Chapter 2, “Asking Compelling Clinical Questions” (pp. 33–54)
    Chapter 21, “Generating Evidence Through Quantitative and Qualitative Research” (pp. 607–653)
    Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26, 91–108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
     
    Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
     
    Hoare, Z., & Hoe, J. (2013). Understanding quantitative research: Part 2. Nursing Standard, 27(18), 48–55. doi:10.7748/ns2013.01.27.18.48.c9488
     
    Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
     
    Hoe, J., & Hoare, Z. (2012). Understanding quantitative research: Part 1. Nursing Standard, 27(15), 52–57. doi:10.7748/ns2012.12.27.15.52.c9485
     
    Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.
     
    Walden University Library. (n.d.-a). Databases A-Z: Nursing. Retrieved September 6, 2019, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981
     
    Walden University Library. (n.d.-b). Evaluating resources: Primary & secondary sources. Retrieved January 22, 2020, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/sources
     
    Walden University Library. (n.d.-f). Keyword searching: Finding articles on your topic: Boolean terms. Retrieved September 19, 2018, from http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/keyword/boolean
     
    Walden University Library. (n.d.-g). Keyword searching: Finding articles on your topic: Introduction to keyword searching. Retrieved September 19, 2018, from http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/keyword/searching-basics
     
    Walden University Library. (n.d.-i). Quick Answers: What are filtered and unfiltered resources in nursing? Retrieved September 6, 2019, from https://academicanswers.waldenu.edu/faq/73299
     
    Document: Matrix Worksheet Template (Word Document)
     
    Required Media
    Centers for Research Quality. (2015a, August 13). Overview of qualitative research methods [Video file]. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/IsAUNs-IoSQ
     
    Centers for Research Quality. (2015b, August 13). Overview of quantitative research methods [Video file]. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/cwU8as9ZNlA
     
    Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Review of research: Anatomy of a research study [Mutlimedia file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
     
    Schulich Library McGill. (2017, June 6). Types of reviews [Video file]. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/5Rv9z7Mp4kg

    Click here  to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS

    Who We Are 

    We are a professional custom writing website. If you have searched a question and bumped into our website just know you are in the right place to get help in your coursework.

    Do you handle any type of coursework?

    Yes. We have posted over our previous orders to display our experience. Since we have done this question before, we can also do it for you. To make sure we do it perfectly, please fill our Order Form. Filling the order form correctly will assist our team in referencing, specifications and future communication.

     

    Is it hard to Place an Order?

    ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT

    1. Click on the  “Order Now” on the main Menu and a new page will appear with an order form to be filled.
    2. Fill in your paper’s requirements in the “PAPER INFORMATION” section and the system will calculate your order price/cost.
    3. Fill in your paper’s academic level, deadline and the required number of pages from the drop-down menus.
    4. Click “FINAL STEP” to enter your registration details and get an account with us for record-keeping and then, click on “PROCEED TO CHECKOUT” at the bottom of the page.
     

    100% Reliable Site. Make this your Home of Academic Papers.

    Order Button Paypal

    Always Order High-Quality Academic Papers from HERE 

     
    5. From there, the payment sections will show, follow the guided payment process and your order will be available for our writing team to work on it.

    SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS: ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT

    We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so that it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

     
     
     
    Your assignment woes ends here!
     

NEED HELP WITH YOUR NURSING ASSIGNMENTS ?

We are dedicated to delivering high quality nursing papers that adhere to the provided instructions, are adequately referenced with the latest scholarly knowledge,

Timely Delivery

Respecting your time and needs, we complete and deliver your orders within the specified timeframe.

Highly skilled writers

We employ experienced and qualified PhD and MD writers able to deal with any types of academic papers

100% unique content

Thorough research and the best academic writing practices ensure complete originality and high quality of every paper we deliver.

Order Now