NURS 6630 Week 7 Assessing And Treating Patients With Psychosis And Schizophrenia

 NURS 6630 Week 7 Assessing And Treating Patients With Psychosis And Schizophrenia

NURS 6630 Week 7 Assessing And Treating Patients With Psychosis And Schizophrenia

Psychosis and schizophrenia greatly impact the brain’s normal processes, which interfere with the ability to think clearly. When symptoms of these disorders are uncontrolled, patients may struggle to function in daily life. However, patients often thrive when properly diagnosed and treated under the close supervision of a psychiatric mental health practitioner. For this Assignment, as you examine the patient case study in this week’s Learning Resources, consider how you might assess and treat patients presenting with psychosis and schizophrenia.
To prepare for this Assignment:
· Review this week’s Learning Resources, including the Medication Resources indicated for this week.
· Reflect on the psychopharmacologic treatments you might recommend for the assessment and treatment of patients with schizophrenia-related psychoses.
The Assignment: 5 pages          { https://mym.cdn.laureate-media.com/2dett4d/Walden/NURS/6630/DT/week_06/index.html }
Examine Case Study: Pakistani Woman With Delusional Thought Processes. You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the medication to prescribe to this patient. Be sure to consider factors that might impact the patient’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes.
At each decision point, you should evaluate all options before selecting your decision and moving throughout the exercise. Before you make your decision, make sure that you have researched each option and that you evaluate the decision that you will select. Be sure to research each option using the primary literature.
Introduction to the case (1 page)
· Briefly explain and summarize the case for this Assignment. Be sure to include the specific patient factors that may impact your decision making when prescribing medication for this patient.
Decision #1 (1 page)
· Which decision did you select?
· Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
· Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
· What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
· Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.
Decision #2 (1 page)
· Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
· Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
· What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
· Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.
Decision #3 (1 page)
· Why did you select this decision? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
· Why did you not select the other two options provided in the exercise? Be specific and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
· What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the Learning Resources (including the primary literature).
· Explain how ethical considerations may impact your treatment plan and communication with patients. Be specific and provide examples.
Conclusion (1 page)
· Summarize your recommendations on the treatment options you selected for this patient. Be sure to justify your recommendations and support your response with clinically relevant and patient-specific resources, including the primary literature.
Note: Support your rationale with a minimum of five academic resources. While you may use the course text to support your rationale, it will not count toward the resource requirement. You should be utilizing the primary and secondary literature.
Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632). All papers submitted must use this formatting.
The Assignment
The client is a 34-year-old Pakistani female who moved to the United States in her late teens/early 20s. She is currently in an “arranged” marriage (her husband was selected for her since she was 9 years old). She presents to your office today following a 21 day hospitalization for what was diagnosed as “brief psychotic disorder.” She was given this diagnosis as her symptoms have persisted for less than 1 month.
Prior to admission, she was reporting visions of Allah, and over the course of a week, she believed that she was the prophet Mohammad. She believed that she would deliver the world from sin. Her husband became concerned about her behavior to the point that he was afraid of leaving their 4 children with her. One evening, she was “out of control” which resulted in his calling the police and her subsequent admission to an inpatient psych unit.
During today’s assessment, she appears quite calm, and insists that the entire incident was “blown out of proportion.” She denies that she believed herself to be the prophet Mohammad and states that her husband was just out to get her because he never loved her and wanted an “American wife” instead of her. She tells you that she knows this because the television is telling her so.
She currently weighs 140 lbs, and is 5’ 5
 
SUBJECTIVE
Client reports that her mood is “good.” She denies auditory/visual hallucinations, but believes that the television does talk to her. She believes that Allah sends her messages through the TV. At times throughout the clinical interview, she becomes hostile towards the PMHNP, but then calms down.
You reviewed her hospital records and find that she has been medically worked up by a physician who reported her to be in overall good health. Lab studies were all within normal limits.
Client admits that she stopped taking her Risperdal about a week after she got out of the hospital because she thinks her husband is going to poison her so that he can marry an American woman.
MENTAL STATUS EXAM
The client is alert, oriented to person, place, time, and event. She is dressed appropriately for the weather and time of year. She demonstrates no noteworthy mannerisms, gestures, or tics. Her speech is slow and at times, interrupted by periods of silence. Self-reported mood is euthymic. Affect constricted. Although the client denies visual or auditory hallucinations, she appears to be “listening” to something. Delusional and paranoid thought processes as described, above. Insight and judgment are impaired. She is currently denying suicidal or homicidal ideation.
The PMHNP administers the PANSS which reveals the following scores:
-40 for the positive symptoms scale
-20 for the negative symptom scale
-60 for general psychopathology scale
Diagnosis: Schizophrenia, paranoid type, DSM–5 295.90. Persecutory type: This subtype applies when the central theme of the delusion involves the individual’s belief that he or she is being conspired against, cheated, spied on, followed, poisoned or drugged, maliciously maligned, harassed, or obstructed in the pursuit of long-term goals (American Psychiatric Association, 2013).
 
Examine Case Study: Pakistani Woman with Delusional Thought Processes. You will be asked to make three decisions concerning the medication to prescribe to this client. Be sure to consider factors that might impact the client’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes.
 
Decision #1
The decision was made to start Invega Sustenna 234 mg intramuscular X1 followed by 156 mg intramuscular on day four and monthly thereafter. This medication was selected because it blocks dopamine two receptors, reducing positive symptoms of psychosis and stabilizing affective symptoms, blocks serotonin 2A receptors, causing the enhancement of dopamine release in specific brain regions and thus reducing motor side effects and possibly improving cognitive and affective symptoms, and serotonin seven antagonist properties may contribute to antidepressant actions. Psychotic symptoms can improve within one week, but it may take several weeks for full effect on behavior and cognition. Classically recommended to wait at least 4–6 weeks to determine drug efficacy, but in practice, some patients may require up to 16–20 weeks to show a good response, especially cognitive symptoms (Stahl, S., 2014b). My goal was to reduce the patient’s psychosis and delusions of persecution. When the patient returned, her symptoms improved, with her only complaint being irritated at the injection site, a common complaint of IM injectable medications. The pharmaceutical company developed the medication to dissolve slowly after deep intramuscular injection before being hydrolyzed to paliperidone and absorbed into the systemic circulation. The pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of the INVEGA SUSTENNA® formulation is biphasic. Comprised of an initial relatively fast zero-order input, this allows rapid attainment of therapeutic concentrations without oral supplementation; and a subsequently maintained second-stage, first-order input, allowing for once-monthly administration (Procyshyn, R., Lamoure, J., Katzman, M., Skinner, P., & Sherman, S., 2019). Having the advantage of not needing to worry if the patient receives the correct dose in the face of her significant psychiatric instability, this medication is the best choice. With Zyprexa and Abilify as alternate options, both were oral. Given how ill the patient was, neither of those medications would be in her best interest for compliance reasons. The best choice was the IM Invega Sustenna, which is why it was selected for this patient.
Decision #2
I chose to continue the same dose but instead changing the location of the site to the deltoid. By changing the site, my goal was to decrease soreness in the patient’s IM site. When the patient returned in four weeks for a follow-up, the result was the patient continued to have improved, with a 50% reduction in symptoms. She reported an additional 2.5 pounds of weight gain and was concerned about this. Considering the pharmacokinetics, Paliperidone palmitate is a benzoxazole derivative that is hydrolyzed to the active moiety, paliperidone, and absorbed into the systemic circulation. The palmitate ester of paliperidone is an aqueous suspension that utilizes nanoparticle technology. The resulting increased surface area leads to a rapid release of medication and a relatively short time to steady-state. Following an injection, active paliperidone plasma levels have been detected from day 1; therefore, coadministration with oral paliperidone on the initiation of therapy is not required. Following the intramuscular administration of single doses in the deltoid muscle, on average, a 28% higher peak concentration is observed compared with injection in the gluteal muscle (U.S. National Library of Medicine, 2020). At this point, adding additional medications would not be appropriate. Alternate options included adding Haldol and Abilify to the Invega Sustenna. Given that Invega had positive results, other than the injection site’s discomfort, the best choice was to remain on the same dose and change the injection locations.
Decision #3
I chose to remain on the same dose of Invega Sustenna due to its efficacy and the fact that the patient has been on the medication for less than six months. A referral to a dietician was made for the patient to counsel her on proper nutritional needs and exercise regimen now that her negative symptoms have subsided. The patient is to follow up in one month. If she is still having untoward symptoms after six months, Abilify Maintena will be considered for the patient at that time. Any other medications would be unnecessary at this time.
Legal and ethical considerations for the patient include that her negative symptoms of schizophrenia affected her quality of life and possibly her safety. With the immediate need to protect the patient and ensure she received her medication in the proper doses, the injection mediation was best. Having her husband as an advocate also helped ensure the patient’s success.
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders
(5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Procyshyn, R., Lamoure, J., Katzman, M., Skinner, P., & Sherman, S. (2019).
Need for Bioequivalence Standards that Reflect the Clinical Importance of the Complex Pharmacokinetics of Paliperidone Palmitate Long-Acting Injectable Suspension. Journal Of Pharmacy & Pharmaceutical Sciences: A Publication Of The Canadian Society For Pharmaceutical Sciences, Societe Canadienne Des Sciences Pharmaceutiques, 22(1), 548–566. https://doi-org.ezp.waldenulibrary.org/10.18433/jpps30669
Stahl, S. (2013). Stahl’s essential psychopharmacology: Neuroscientific basis and practical
applications (4th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Stahl, S. (2014b). The prescriber’s guide (5th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
U.S. National Library of Medicine (2020). Once-monthly paliperidone injection for the treatment
of schizophrenia. Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2938305/

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS –  NURS 6630 Week 7 Assessing And Treating Patients With Psychosis And Schizophrenia

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

• Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

• Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

• APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

• Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

• LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.  NURS 6630 Week 7 Assessing And Treating Patients With Psychosis And Schizophrenia

• Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

• Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

• Guarantee

  

• Zero Plagiarism
• On-time delivery
• A-Grade Papers
• Free Revision
• 24/7 Support
• 100% Confidentiality
• Professional Writers

• Services Offered

• Custom paper writing
• Question and answers
• Essay paper writing
• Editing and proofreading
• Plagiarism removal services
• Multiple answer questions

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, affordable, plagiarism-free paper