Criteria and Rubric Development

For effective assessment and analysis of the student’s knowledge, the development of criteria and rubrics is necessary. The criteria and rubric provide the student with a basic knowledge of the things which are required from the student to assess their learning abilities and capabilities. 

Assessment Description

The assessment will evaluate the learning outcomes of the course- Nursing Informatics and will assess the cognitive abilities of the students to implement their learned theoretical knowledge in their practical life. The learning outcomes of the course will focus on improving the abilities of the nurses to provide patient-centered, equitable, and justified healthcare services to patients without discrimination (Veinot et al., 2019). It will also aim to develop the nurse’s ability to utilize their cognitive thinking and implement evidence-based knowledge in practical situations while ensuring the use of technological advancements. 

NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 2 Criteria and Rubric Development

Specific Learning Outcomes

Specific learning outcomes which the students will be evaluated will be their ability to effectively use technology for updating patient information, e-monitoring, diagnosis, providing patient-centered treatment, and assessing any drug-drug interactions through the help of digital automated systems. The students will be assessed on the ability to effectively utilize and integrate evidence-based learning, cognitive thinking, and practical experience learned through simulation-based learning to provide patient-centered care through the use of technology (Choi et al., 2021). It will also aim to analyze the ability of the nurses to handle complex scenarios without panicking and making errors under pressure (Simulation-based learning and theoretical examination).

Assessment services the needs of the Learner

The assessment services the needs of the learners by aiming to learn the use of technology integrated with the healthcare system. The learners will learn to use technological advancements to provide safe and quality care to patients through the use of automated technological advancements such as Automated IV Pumps, EMR (electronic medical record) systems, remote monitoring systems, and CCC (Central Command Center) (Bacon & Hoffman, 2020). It will help them to use technology to reduce the chances of medication errors thus reducing mortality, morbidity rates, and healthcare disparities caused due to medication errors. 

Steps in Assembling and Administrating Test

A list of steps is required in assembling and administrating tests for specific learning outcomes. These steps ensure that proper steps are followed to assess the student’s ability to learn learning outcomes. 

Assembling of the Test

Assembling the test includes the careful selection of the contents of the course. These course contents are the basis for the learning the students will undergo throughout their course. After the selection of the contents, specific questions are designed in a complex manner to assess the cognitive thinking of the students. These questions will be assessed by the board of professors responsible for teaching nursing informatics. They will critically analyze the question and will modify these questions respectively to make them critically and cognitively challenging. Once the questions have been affirmed, they will be sequenced from easier to the most difficult. This will help to encourage the students and will test their cognitive and critical thinking to the utmost capacity.  

Administrating the Test

The test will be administered to the students after properly informing them about the guidelines, criteria, and rubrics. They will be informed in detail about the criteria and the rubric which they must follow to score excellent grades in their assessment. The following are the steps for administrating the test:

• Guidelines

The students will be guided about the rules, regulations, and instructions by the instructor for effectively attempting the test. The students will be encouraged to utilize their cognitive thinking, theoretical knowledge, and simulation-based learning to devise solutions to the problems in the test. 

• Outcomes

The students will be assessed on their ability to imply simulation-based learning, theoretical knowledge, and cognitive thinking to the test.

• Assessment

The students will be assessed on their ability to use technology in simulation-based learning to provide effective healthcare services thus depicting sound psychomotor, cognitive, and affective learning abilities. 

Knowledge Gaps

Knowledge gaps can include the lack of ability of professors to effectively collaborate to devise simulation-based learning assessments where healthcare is integrated with the use of technology. Along with this, knowledge gaps such as the lack of a standard testing format for the assessment can hinder the assembling and administering of tests. 

Learning in Multiple Domains 

The students were assessed for their cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains in the field of nursing informatics. 

Cognitive 

The cognitive thinking of the students was assessed by putting them through various situations which challenged their cognitive (critical thinking) abilities. The cognitive knowledge of the students was assessed by putting them through various simulation-based scenarios and theoretical/ practical examinations. These examinations increased the analytical reasoning of the students which helped to increase the reasoning abilities that helped them to effectively use technology integrated with healthcare (Nascimento et al., 2021). 

Psychomotor

The psychomotor skills of the students were increased during the practical examination and clinical-based simulation. The psychomotor domain helped the nurses to effectively utilize technology to provide basic healthcare services such as blood pressure monitoring services, EMR, Automated IV pumps, catheter insertions, and basic things such as IV infusions and injections. These skills were assessed through theoretical, practical, and simulation-based examinations (Nascimento et al., 2021). 

NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 2 Criteria and Rubric Development

Affective

This area assessed the nurse’s ability to implement evidence-based learning in their professional practice where they support their actions with theoretical knowledge that is supported by research articles (Nascimento et al., 2021).

Knowledge Gaps

The lack of availability of simulation-based technology (mannequins, EMR systems, Automated IV pumps, etc.) will prevent the effective development of cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains of the students. The lack of knowledge and expertise of professors regarding the use of technology will prevent the effective learning of the students. 

Performance-Level Criteria

Communication of Grading Expectations

Grading expectations should be communicated to the learners in a clear, detailed, and well-communicated manner. The instructor should employ an open-line communication strategy to communicate each aspect of the grading criteria to ensure that the students are well aware of the difference in the non-performance, basic, proficient, and distinguished criteria. They should be clearly explained how these grading criteria differentiate from one another and how the students can aim to reach all the Distinguished criteria. 

Validity and Reliability of Assessment

The validity and reliability of the assessment are measured to assess the ability of the assessment to provide accurate and consistent criteria to assess the learning outcomes of the students. Validity of the assessment assesses if the question in the assessment is related to the learning outcomes of the courses, in this case- nursing informatics. It will assess if the learning outcomes are achieved which include the ability of the nurses to effectively utilize technology integrated with healthcare services to minimize medication errors, mortality, and morbidity rates (Eddy et al., 2020). 

Reliability of the assessment assesses if the test questions are consistent over a while. It assesses the ability of the students to score the same marks in the respective test over a while at repeated intervals. Reliability of the assessment can be assessed on the above-four mentioned grading criteria – Non-Performance, Basic. Proficient, and Distinguished. The fulfillment of the scoring guide will indicate the reliability of the grading criteria (Nolet et al., 2021) 

Strengths and Weaknesses

The strength includes the reliability of the criteria to assess the learning outcomes of the course. The criteria aim to assess all of the areas of the course which comply with the learning outcomes of the course. The weakness includes the lack of availability of simulation-based learning to aid the practical knowledge of the students and thus limits their ability to effectively utilize technology integrated with healthcare services. 

NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 2 Criteria and Rubric Development

References 

Bacon, O., & Hoffman, L. (2020). System-level patient safety practices that aim to reduce medication errors associated with infusion pumps: An evidence review. Journal of Patient Safety, 16(3S Suppl 1), S42–S47. https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000722 

Choi, J., Bove, L., & Tarte, V. (2021). Nursing informatics competency after experiencing simulated electronic health records: Descriptive study. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 284, 143–147. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI210686 

Eddy, L. H., Bingham, D. D., Crossley, K. L., Shahid, N. F., Ellingham-Khan, M., Otteslev, A., Figueredo, N. S., Mon-Williams, M., & Hill, L. (2020). The validity and reliability of observational assessment tools available to measure fundamental movement skills in school-age children: A systematic review. PloS One, 15(8), e0237919. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237919

Nascimento, J. D. S. G., Siqueira, T. V., Oliveira, J. L. G., Alves, M. G., Regino, D. D. S. G., & Dalri, M. C. B. (2021). Development of clinical competence in nursing in simulation: the perspective of Bloom’s taxonomy. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 74(1), e20200135. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2020-0135

Nolet, P. S., Yu, H., Côté, P., Meyer, A. L., Kristman, V. L., Sutton, D., Murnaghan, K., & Lemeunier, N. (2021). Reliability and validity of manual palpation for the assessment of patients with low back pain: A systematic and critical review. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, 29(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-021-00384-3

Veinot, T. C., Ancker, J. S., & Bakken, S. (2019). Health informatics and health equity: improving our reach and impact. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA, 26(8-9), 689–695. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocz132

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

SCORE A+ WITH HELP FROM OUR PROFESSIONAL WRITERS – NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 2 Criteria and Rubric Development

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

• Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, including a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words. Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source. One or two-sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words. I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

• Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately. In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies. Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work). Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

• APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with the APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required). Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation. I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

• Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage over-utilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Master’s level and deduct points accordingly. As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content. It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source. NURS FPX 6111 Assessment 2 Criteria and Rubric Development

• LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me. Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes. Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own? Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in Loud-cloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

• Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is a 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies. Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances. If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect. I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension. As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

• Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me: Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class. Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

• Guarantee

• Zero Plagiarism
• On-time delivery
• A-Grade Papers
• Free Revision
• 24/7 Support
• 100% Confidentiality
• Professional Writers

• Services Offered

• Custom paper writing
• Question and answers
• Essay paper writing
• Editing and proofreading
• Plagiarism removal services
• Multiple answer questions

We will process your orders through multiple stages and checks to ensure that what we are delivering to you, in the end, is something that is precise as you envisioned it. All of our essay writing service products are 100% original, ensuring that there is no plagiarism in them. The sources are well-researched and cited so it is interesting. Our goal is to help as many students as possible with their assignments, i.e. our prices are affordable and services premium.

Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order a custom-written, affordable, plagiarism-free paper