Overview
Please read carefully and complete each part properly, as requested. Please don't miss any part. Be professional, because I don't have time for errors. Please don't use any AI; be honest!
Compose an argumentative paper that follows the analysis/argument requirement. The analysis/argument sections must be identified. Deductive or Inductive forms must be used correctly. The paper must be only 1 typed page, text ONLY, no less, with a double-spaced 12-point font, Times New Roman. Margins must be standard 1 inch. The content must be comprehensive and the topic and position must be clearly stated. Quotations may be used as support, but research is required. The paper must show mastery of two parts. 1. Analyze- Analyze a topic of your choice thoroughly. The analysis must demonstrate mastery of at least one of the critical thinking components studied, i.e., fallacies, existential fallacy, Boolean/Aristotelian standpoint, Mill's methods, validity, soundness, strength, etc. The analysis should either strengthen or weaken your position or do away with it altogether. 2. Argument- You must reinvent the topic based on the analysis and write an argument in standard form. You must demonstrate mastery of at least one argument form, i.e. deduction (math or definition), induction (analogy, prediction, signs, etc.)
I attached a sample paper for you to review.