OnlineNursingOwl
← All nursing posts

Social Science · Studypool

Identify what steps the counselor should take

Case Vignette: Alex's Story

Background Information: Alex is an 8-year-old boy referred to counseling by his school counselor due to concerns about social withdrawal, difficulties concentrating in class, and frequent stomachaches reported by his teacher. Alex lives with his biological mother, stepfather, and younger sister (age 5). His biological father is not actively involved in his life, and Alex has limited contact with extended family.

Presenting Concerns: During the intake session, Alex's mother shared that Alex has been "moody" and "clingy" at home, often wanting to sleep in her room. She attributed this to stress from school or a recent move to a new neighborhood. Alex remained mostly quiet during the first session, making little eye contact and shrugging when asked questions. When he did speak, he described feeling "tired" and sometimes having a "bad stomach."

Session 1: The initial session focused on rapport building and helping Alex feel comfortable. The counselor engaged Alex in a simple game to ease his anxiety and asked open-ended questions about his interests and school experiences. Alex was hesitant but shared that he enjoys drawing and playing with Legos. He avoided discussing his home life.

Session 2: Alex appeared slightly more relaxed and engaged in drawing while talking with the counselor. He shared that he feels "worried a lot" but had trouble identifying what he is worried about. When asked about his family, Alex mentioned that his stepfather "gets mad a lot," but he quickly changed the subject and said he "doesn't like talking about it."

Session 3 (Disclosure): During the third session, Alex disclosed physical abuse by his stepfather while engaging in a drawing activity. He quietly said, "I don't like going home because sometimes my stepdad hits me." When the counselor gently asked for more details, Alex described incidents where his stepfather used a belt to punish him for "being bad" and sometimes yelled at his mother when she tried to intervene. Alex appeared visibly distressed, lowering his head and avoiding eye contact.

The counselor validated Alex's feelings, assured him that he was brave for sharing, and explained that it was their responsibility to help keep him safe. The counselor carefully documented the disclosure.

In a 1-2 page paper (in APA, 7th edition format), discuss the ethical and legal considerations the counselor needs to make according to your state laws. Identify what steps the counselor should take. Justify your decisions using case law, identifying specific counseling law or ethical guidelines, and/or research or your textbook. When writing your paper, consider these ethical and clinical considerations:

  • Safety: What are the immediate safety concerns for Alex and his family that need to be assessed? Is the counselor legally mandated to report the suspected abuse to child protective services (CPS) in your state?
  • Support: How can the counselor provide Alex with a safe and supportive environment to process his feelings while being mindful not to retraumatize him?
  • Family Dynamics: Should the counselor engage Alex's mother in counseling to explore protective measures and address family needs?
  • Coordination: Collaboration with CPS, school personnel, and other involved professionals to ensure a comprehensive approach to Alex's safety and well-being.

Rubric

COUN-5133 Module 3

COUN-5133 Module 3

CriteriaRatingsPts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAdherence to APA Format

12.5 pts

Exemplary

Paper follows all aspects of APA 7th edition formatting, including title page, citations, references, font, and spacing.

10 pts

Proficient

Paper mostly adheres to APA 7th edition formatting, with minor errors in citations, references, or formatting.

7 pts

Developing

Paper demonstrates limited adherence to APA formatting, with several noticeable errors in citations and formatting.

5 pts

Needs Improvement

Paper does not follow APA format, with multiple formatting errors or a lack of citations and references.

12.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Ethical Considerations

12.5 pts

Exemplary

Clearly identifies and thoroughly explains all relevant ethical considerations, with specific examples from the vignette.

10 pts

Proficient

Identifies most relevant ethical considerations and explains them with some examples from the vignette.

7 pts

Developing

Partially identifies ethical considerations, with limited or unclear explanations and few examples from the vignette.

5 pts

Needs Improvement

Does not adequately identify or explain ethical considerations related to the vignette.

12.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Legal Considerations

12.5 pts

Exemplary

Clearly identifies and accurately explains state-specific legal requirements (e.g., mandated reporting) in detail. Identifies the state law clearly.

10 pts

Proficient

Identifies most legal requirements, with minor inaccuracies or less detailed explanations specific to the state.

7 pts

Developing

Partially identifies legal requirements, with limited detail or significant inaccuracies in state-specific details.

5 pts

Needs Improvement

Fails to identify or explain key legal requirements, or explanations are unrelated to the vignette or state laws.

12.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSteps for Counselor to Take

12.5 pts

Exemplary

Provides a comprehensive and logically sequenced action plan for the counselor, grounded in ethical and legal standards.

10 pts

Proficient

Provides an action plan for the counselor, but with minor gaps in logic or alignment with ethical and legal standards.

7 pts

Developing

Provides a partial or unclear action plan, with notable gaps or misalignment with ethical and legal standards.

5 pts

Needs Improvement

Fails to provide an action plan or offers an incoherent and unrelated approach for the counselor to take.

12.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity and Organization

12.5 pts

Exemplary

Writing is clear, well-organized, and concise, with excellent grammar, spelling, and flow.

10 pts

Proficient

Writing is clear and organized but may contain minor grammar, spelling, or flow issues.

7 pts

Developing

Writing is somewhat disorganized or unclear, with noticeable grammar or spelling errors that affect understanding.

5 pts

Needs Improvement

Writing lacks clarity and organization, with frequent grammar and spelling errors that interfere with readability.

12.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength and Depth

12.5 pts

Exemplary

Paper is within the 1-2 page limit and provides in-depth, thoughtful analysis of the assignment topic.

10 pts

Proficient

Paper is within the page limit but provides a less detailed or somewhat superficial analysis of the topic.

7 pts

Developing

Paper exceeds or falls short of the page limit and provides minimal analysis or discussion of the topic.

5 pts

Needs Improvement

Paper does not meet the length requirement and lacks analysis or depth in addressing the topic.

12.5 pts

Total Points: 75