Overview
Question1:
Cultivating positive relationships with supervisees and trainees can be difficult. Based on this week's lecture, what do you think your greatest strength will be when developing and maintaining these relationships? What do you think your biggest challenge will be, and how will you use the concepts from this week's module to overcome that challenge?
Remember to review the Reflection Paper rubric and instructions for reviewing a peer's submission in the Important Course Information module.
Additionally, please include LINKS or DOIs to any articles or books referenced outside of the assigned readings as part of your APA citation (as is required when using web-based referencesLinks to an external site.). Failing to do so will result in point deductions.
Readings:
- Read Curry, S. M., Gravina, N. E., Sleiman, A. A., & Richard, E. (2019). The effects of engaging in rapport-building behaviors on productivity and discretionary effort. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 39(3-4), 213-226.
- Read Fong, E. H., Catagnus, R. M., Brodhead, M. T., Quigley, S., & Field, S. (2016). Developing the cultural awareness skills of behavior analysts. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 9 (1), 84–94.
- Read Ehrlich, R. J., Nosik, M. R., Carr, J. E., & Wine, B. (2020). Teaching employees how to receive feedback: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 40(1-2), 19-29.
Reflection Paper Rubric | ||
Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection Length* *(excludes reference section and direct quotes from references that are longer than 5 words) | 5 ptsFull CreditReflection paper content was greater than 150 words. 3 ptsPartial CreditReflection paper content was between 100-149 words. 0 ptsZero CreditReflection paper content was less than 99 words. | 5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, Usage, and Spelling | 5 ptsFull CreditReflection paper contained less than 2 grammar, usage, or spelling errors. 3 ptsPartial CreditReflection paper contained 3-4 grammar, usage, or spelling errors. 0 ptsZero CreditReflection paper contained more than 5 grammar, usage, or spelling errors and proofreading was not apparent. | 5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences and Utilization of Outside Resources | 5 ptsFull CreditThe author used references from peer-reviewed behavioral sources in APA format and cited one or more originally-sourced behavioral peer-reviewed scholarly article, outside of the assigned readings. 3 ptsPartial CreditThe author used references in APA format of assigned readings but did not include an additional originally-sourced behavioral peer-reviewed scholarly article (vice versa). 0 ptsZero CreditThe author did not utilize APA format for referenced material; did not use assigned reading nor cite an originally-sourced behavioral peer-reviewed scholarly article. | 5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAddressing the Prompt | 5 ptsFull CreditThe author’s reflection paper clearly responds to the assignment prompt, develops ideas cogently, organizes them logically, and supports them through empirical writing. 3 ptsPartial CreditThe author’s reflection paper clearly responds to the assignment prompt but lacks cogent ideas, logical organization, and/or empirical writing. 0 ptsZero CreditThe author’s reflection paper does not correspond with the assignment prompt, mainly discusses personal opinions, irrelevant information, or information is presented with limited logic and lack of development and organization of ideas. | 5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication | 5 ptsFull CreditThe author’s post clearly demonstrates application and relationship to the week’s assigned reading/topic. 3 ptsPartial CreditThe author’s post refers to the assigned topic/reading tangentially but does not demonstrate application. 0 ptsZero CreditThe author’s post does not demonstrate application of the week’s assigned topic/reading. | 5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOriginality | 5 ptsFull CreditThe author clearly articulates information that is not a direct summary of the materials presented in class or typical output from artificial intelligence. 3 ptsPartial CreditThe author is able to articulate novel responses, but rudimentary summarization or typical output from artificial intelligence is detected. 0 ptsZero CreditThe author’s response is heavily verbatim or typical output of artificial intelligence. | 5 pts |
Total Points: 30
** Please use the rubric to make sure get the maximun of points check APA format, mention the references, etc.