Overview
Team Assignment
Topic: CLC - Mini Case 3 and Presentation
Please take a look: Course URL: https://www.cengage.com/dashboard/home
Complete the Topic in Cengage/Mindtap - CLC - Mini Case 3 and Presentation
This is a team assignment, so I am only responsible for my section, and two Powerpoints. My Section is: E (3); Powerpoint: Create a 2-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you summarize your answers from the mini case. Be sure to include graphs, charts, and trends as appropriate. Include speaker notes below each content-related slide that represent what would be said if giving the presentation in person. Expand upon the information included on the slide, and do not simply restate it. Ensure the speaker notes include a minimum of 50-100 words per slide.
This is a Collaborative Learning Community (CLC) assignment.
The purpose of this assignment is to explain core concepts related to fixed income securities.
Read the Chapter 5 Mini Case in Financial Management: Theory and Practice. Complete Parts 1 and 2.
Part 1: Using complete sentences and academic vocabulary, please answer questions a through f.
Part 2: Create a 5-10-slide PowerPoint presentation in which you summarize your answers from the mini case. Be sure to include graphs, charts, and trends as appropriate.
Present the PowerPoint to the class as directed by your instructor. In addition, submit both your answers to the mini case and your PowerPoint to the instructor.
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Rubric Criteria
Total: 30 points
Criterion | 1. Unsatisfactory | 2. Insufficient | 3. Approaching | 4. Acceptable | 5. Target |
Question A Question A | 0 points Answer is not present. | 2.66 points Answer is present but lacks detail or is incomplete. | 2.84 points Answer is present. | 3.13 points Answer is detailed. | 3.6 points Answer is thorough. |
Question B Question B | 0 points Answer is not present. | 2.66 points Answer is present but lacks detail or is incomplete. | 2.84 points Answer is present. | 3.13 points Answer is detailed. | 3.6 points Answer is thorough. |
Question C Question C | 0 points Answer is not present. | 2.66 points Answer is present but lacks detail or is incomplete. | 2.84 points Answer is present. | 3.13 points Answer is detailed. | 3.6 points Answer is thorough. |
Question D Question D | 0 points Answer is not present. | 2.66 points Answer is present but lacks detail or is incomplete. | 2.84 points Answer is present. | 3.13 points Answer is detailed. | 3.6 points Answer is thorough. |
Question E Question E | 0 points Answer is not present. | 2.66 points Answer is present but lacks detail or is incomplete. | 2.84 points Answer is present. | 3.13 points Answer is detailed. | 3.6 points Answer is thorough. |
Question F Question F | 0 points Answer is not present. | 2.66 points Answer is present but lacks detail or is incomplete. | 2.84 points Answer is present. | 3.13 points Answer is detailed. | 3.6 points Answer is thorough. |
Presentation of Content Presentation of Content | 0 points The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Presentation includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. | 2.22 points The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Presentation includes some persuasive information. | 2.37 points The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. | 2.61 points The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information, exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Presentation includes persuasive information from reliable sources. | 3 points The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea. |
Speaker Notes Speaker Notes | 0 points Speaker notes are not present. | 0.44 points Speaker notes are present but lacks detail or is incomplete. | 0.47 points Speaker notes are present. | 0.52 points Speaker notes are detailed. | 0.6 points Speaker notes are thorough. |
Layout Layout | 0 points The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. | 0.89 points The layout shows some structure but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. | 0.95 points The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. | 1.04 points The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. | 1.2 points The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text. |
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) | 0 points Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. | 0.89 points Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. | 0.95 points Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. | 1.04 points The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. | 1.2 points The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope. |
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence structure, etc.) | 0 points Errors in grammar or syntax are pervasive and impede meaning. Incorrect language choice or sentence structure errors are found throughout. | 0.89 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language choice or sentence structure are recurrent. | 0.95 points Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted. | 1.04 points Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence structure are used. | 1.2 points No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence structure are used throughout. |
Format/Documentation (Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level; documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., appropriate to assignment and discipline.) | 0 points Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. | 0.89 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | 0.95 points Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | 1.04 points Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | 1.2 points Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |