Overview
(5 slides for the PowerPoint, not including Title and Reference page)
(APA format, in-text citations are a must)
(Slides must be innovative, not bland)
(Must include Title and Reference Page)
Instructions, Part B: Written Component - Research
Prepare a PowerPoint slideshow for this question: Should the United States converge accounting standards with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)? Your slideshow should include:
- List of arguments that favor convergence.
- List of arguments that favor nonconvergence.
- Indicate your own conclusion regarding whether the United States should converge with IFRS and the primary considerations that determined your conclusions.
Speaker notes are not required for this assignment. If you choose to include speaker notes in your presentation, they must be uploaded as a separate file so they may go through Turnitin, in order to be included for grading in this assignment.
Remember to follow APA requirements. Also, include a title page and a reference page.
ACT350 Mod 1 CT
| ACT350 Mod 1 CT | ||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements | 60 to >48.0 ptsMeets ExpectationScores 81% - 100% on Connect Activity: "Week 1 Critical Thinking Activity." 48 to >36.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationScores 61% - 80% on Connect Activity: "Week 1 Critical Thinking Activity." 36 to >24.0 ptsBelow ExpectationScores 41% - 60% on Connect Activity: "Week 1 Critical Thinking Activity." 24 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceScores 0% - 40% on Connect Activity: "Week 1 Critical Thinking Activity." | 60 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis | 5 ptsMeets ExpectationProvides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given. 3 ptsApproaches ExpectationSome significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation. 2 ptsBelow ExpectationMajor errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation. 0 ptsLimited EvidenceFails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given. | 5 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCompleteness | 10 ptsMeets ExpectationPresentation includes all required elements: List of arguments in favor, list of arguments against, personal opinion on which is most convincing, and adequate supporting evidence. 6 ptsApproaches ExpectationPresentation is missing one required element, or the supporting lists or evidence are somewhat inadequate. 4 ptsBelow ExpectationPresentation is missing two required elements, or the supporting lists or elements are noticeably inadequate. 0 ptsLimited EvidencePresentation is missing three or more required elements. | 10 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style. | 5 ptsMeets ExpectationProject is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. No errors in grammar, spelling, or formatting. 3 ptsApproaches ExpectationProject is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. 1-3 errors in grammar, spelling, or formatting. 2 ptsBelow ExpectationProject is poorly organized; does not follow proper format. 4-5 errors in grammar, spelling, or formatting. 0 ptsLimited EvidenceProject is not organized or well written, and is not in proper format. Poor quality work. 6 or more errors in grammar, spelling, or formatting. | 5 pts |
Total Points: 80