Overview
Final Argumentative Research Essay, I will be attach the previous rough draft. Just wanted everything to follow the rubric the most as possible. Also wanted to thank you again for all your work. I gladly appreciate it!
Below is the rubric:
ENG120 Final Essay Rubric
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeENG120.P.01 Introduction threshold: 5.0 pts | 5 ptsExemplary: First paragraph has a hook or catchy beginning. The introduction clearly contains details that reflect relevance between the topic and the intended audience.4 ptsProficient: The first paragraph has a hook, but it could be more engaging. The introduction contains details that reflect relevance between the topic and the intended audience. 3 ptsMarginal: A catchy beginning was attempted, but it could be stronger. The introduction contains some details that may reflect relevance between the topic and the intended audience, but they could be stronger or clearer.2 ptsWeak: Very little attempt was made at having a hook to start the paragraph. It is difficult to identify the relevance between the topic and the intended audience.0 ptsNo credit: No attempt was made to catchattention in the first paragraph. No attempt was made to include details that reflect the relevance between the topic and the intended audience of the argumentative research essay. | 5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeENG120.P.02 Thesis Statement threshold: 10.0 pts | 10 ptsExemplary: The thesis shows originality and creativity, is well-developed, and appropriate for the assignment. The thesis provides the scope of the paper without being too broad or narrow. There is a clear claim and three reasons to support the claim. The thesis statement is presented as the last sentence of the introduction.8 ptsProficient: The thesis is adequate. It may need to be broadened or narrowed to better provide the scope of the essay. The claim is generally clear, as are the three reasons to support the claim. The thesis statement may or may not be presented as the last sentence of the introduction. 6 ptsMarginal: The thesis may be weak and may or may not provide the scope of the paper. The claim may be unclear, and/or there may not be three reasons to support the claim. The thesis statement may or may not be presented as the last sentence of the introduction.4 ptsWeak: The thesis provides little to no understanding of the scope of the essay. The claim and three supporting reasons may or may not be included or clearly presented. The thesis statement may or may not be presented as the last sentence of the introduction.0 ptsNo credit: The document lacks a thesis statement. | 10 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeENG120.P.03 Argument threshold: 20.0 pts | 20 ptsExemplary: The argument is clearly presented with three key supporting reasons. The reasons are balanced, thorough, and well-supported.18 ptsProficient: The argument is presented with three key supporting reasons. The reasons are balanced, thorough, and supported. 16 ptsMarginal: The argument is presented with three key supporting reasons. The reasons may or may not be balanced, thorough, and supported.14 ptsWeak: The argument may have fewer than three key supporting reasons. The reasons may be unbalanced or lack sufficient support.0 ptsNo credit: The argument is lacking supporting reasons. | 20 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeENG120.P.04 Counterarguments & Rebuttals threshold: 20.0 pts | 20 ptsExemplary: Three counterarguments and three rebuttals are clearly presented. The counterarguments and rebuttals are supported with research. There is a balanced and fair approach to both sides of the presented argument.18 ptsProficient: Three counterarguments and three rebuttals are presented. The counterarguments and rebuttals are supported with research. There is a balanced and fair approach to both sides of the presented argument. 16 ptsMarginal: Three counterarguments and three rebuttals may or may not be presented. The counterarguments and rebuttals are supported with research, though that research may be limited. There may not be a balanced and fair approach to both sides of the presented argument.14 ptsWeak: There may be fewer than three counterarguments and three rebuttals. The counterarguments and rebuttals may or may not be supported with research, though that research may be limited or irrelevant. There may not be a balanced and fair approach to both sides of the presented argument.0 ptsNo credit: Counterarguments and rebuttals are lacking. | 20 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeENG120.P.05 Conclusion threshold: 5.0 pts | 5 ptsExemplary: The paper comes to a clear conclusion where key arguments are effectively synthesized.4 ptsProficient: The paper comes to a clear conclusion. Key arguments are restated in a way that reinforces the main argument. 3 ptsMarginal: The conclusion offers a basic summary of the key points.2 ptsWeak: The conclusion is weak. There may be limited connections to the main argument.0 ptsNo credit: The paper lacks a clear conclusion. | 5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeENG120.P.06 Organization threshold: 5.0 pts | 5 ptsExemplary: The paper demonstrates exceptional logical flow with smooth transitions and clear connections between ideas. Topic sentences align with the key points in the thesis statement and provide clear structure to the organization of the essay.4 ptsProficient: The paper presents a clear, logical argument with strong organizational structure and smooth transitions. However, the organization may or may not clearly align with the thesis statement. 3 ptsMarginal: The paper maintains basic argumentative structure with some logical connections. However, the organization does not follow the structure established in the thesis statement.2 ptsWeak: The argument is disjointed.0 ptsNo credit: There is no attempt at presenting a clear argumentative structure or logical progression. | 5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeENG120.P.07 Grammar & Style threshold: 10.0 pts | 10 ptsExemplary: There are very few spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors in the document.8 ptsProficient: There are a few spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors in the document. The document may be written in the 1st person rather than the 3rd person. 6 ptsMarginal: There are significant spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors in the document. The document may be written in the 1st person rather than the 3rd person.4 ptsWeak: There are significant spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors in the document. The document may be written in the 1st person rather than the 3rd person.0 ptsNo credit: The final draft has spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors that significantly interfere with understanding the essay. The document may be written in the 1st person, rather than the 3rd person. | 10 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeENG120.P.08 APA Layout threshold: 5.0 pts | 5 ptsExemplary: The paper is formatted correctly according to APA 7th edition guidelines.4 ptsProficient: The paper is mostly formatted according to APA 7th edition formatting guidelines. Errors may be minor. 3 ptsMarginal: There are several deviations from APA 7th edition formatting guidelines, but a clear attempt was made.2 ptsWeak: Frequent errors in formatting are noted, and those errors are inconsistent with APA 7th edition formatting guidelines.0 ptsNo credit: The paper is either not formatted according to APA 7th edition formatting guidelines or the errors significantly deviate from the standards. | 5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeENG120.P.09 In-Text Citations & References threshold: 10.0 pts | 10 ptsExemplary: Integrates 4+ credible academic sources with correctly-formatted APA citations and references.8 ptsProficient: Effectively uses 4+ scholarly sources with mostly correct APA formatting and appropriate citations. Errors may be minor. 6 ptsMarginal: May use fewer than 4 sources with mostly correct citations and references. There are some obvious formatting errors.4 ptsWeak: Limited source usage with inconsistent or incorrect citations or references.0 ptsNo credit: References and/or citations are missing or significantly incorrect. | 10 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeENG120.P.10 Revision threshold: 10.0 pts | 10 ptsExemplary: The writer has addressed nearly all of the feedback provided throughout the term. Changes are effective and appropriate.8 ptsProficient: The writer has addressed a significant amount of the feedback provided throughout the term. Changes are mostly effective and appropriate. 6 ptsMarginal: The writer may have focused more on editing than revising. Large-scale changes may be ineffective.4 ptsWeak: The writer has addressed very little of the feedback provided throughout the term. Changes are minor and/or surface level.0 ptsNo credit: The writer has made virtually no changes to the essay throughout the term. | 10 pts |
Total Points: 100