Please the assignment due is the Final DNP Project template and use the Guide as reference. The project was done over 8 weeks not 12. Please make sure to write in past tense and use the Guide as rubric for the final template.
Now that your project has been successfully implemented and data analyzed, it is time to reflect on what the data means and its implications for the future of nursing practice. Remember, the ultimate goal is to improve patient outcomes, whether that be at the bedside, through administration, or as a nurse educator. The goal is to improve practices to improve patient outcomes. How does your project extend past your implementation, and what is the plan to sustain these positive changes? This manuscript will be the continuation of your project proposal presented as one final manuscript. Convert the language of your proposal manuscript to past tense PAST TENSE as appropriate when you accomplish this assignment.
- Please use the following Final DNP Manuscript template Download Final DNP Manuscript template for this assignment.
- Please review this guide Download guide as you complete your final manuscript.
Library and Writing Resources
- APA Help
- WCU Research and Writing
- DNP Scholarly Project Research Guide
Rubric
WK 4- Section 3 Paper
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAbstract | 5 ptsProficientAll Components of the abstract are reflected in the manuscript: Including Problem Statement, Purpose, Frameworks, Methods, Results and Implications Adhering to word count limit3 ptsAcceptableSome Components of the abstract are missing in the manuscript: Including Problem Statement, Purpose, Frameworks, Methods, Results and Implications or not adhering to word count limit 0 ptsBelow ExpectationsMissing or written below the level of a graduate student. | 5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSection 1 Components: Introduction, Background, Problem, Purpose, PICOT, Theoretical Framework & Literature Synthesis | 25 ptsProficientAll Components of Section 1are reflected in the manuscript: Including Introduction, Background, Problem, Purpose, PICOT, Theoretical Framework & Literature Synthesis.17 ptsAcceptableSome Components of Section 1 are missing in the manuscript: Including Introduction, Background, Problem, Purpose, PICOT, Theoretical Framework & Literature Synthesis 11 ptsBelow ExpectationsSeveral Missing components for Section 1 or written below the level of a graduate student. | 25 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSection 2 Components: Organizational Assessment, Project Purpose, Theoretical and Conceptual Framework, Project Setting, Participants, Intervention, Implementation Plan, Measures, Data Management, Analysis and Ethical Consideration. | 25 ptsProficientAll Components of Section 2 are reflected in the manuscript: Including Organizational Assessment, Project Purpose, Theoretical and Conceptual Framework, Project Setting, Participants, Intervention, Implementation Plan, Measures, Data Management, Analysis and Ethical Consideration.17 ptsAcceptableSome Components of Section 2 are missing in the manuscript: Including Organizational Assessment, Project Purpose, Theoretical and Conceptual Framework, Project Setting, Participants, Intervention, Implementation Plan, Measures, Data Management, Analysis and Ethical Consideration. 11 ptsBelow ExpectationsSeveral Missing components for Section 2 or written below the level of a graduate student. | 25 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResults, Outcome Measures | 55 ptsProficientThorough narrative description and appropriate reference use of tables and figures for data presented. Detailed description, clear presentation of data, appropriate use of charts/tables, accurate numbers. Concise and insightful summary directly addressing the clinical questions.33 ptsAcceptableAdequate narrative description, uses table but lacks detail. Adequate description, data presentation, uses charts/tables, some inaccuracies in statistics. 0 ptsBelow ExpectationsMissing or written below the level of a graduate student. | 55 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion Implications to Practice, Conclusions | 20 ptsProficientComprehensive discussion of theoretical and practical implications, clear and relevant. Clear and relevant future impact, well-justified recommendations for research and practice.12 ptsAcceptableLimited discussion of theoretical and practical implications, lacks relevance. Limited interpretation, poor organization, minimal comparison/contrast of themes. 0 ptsBelow ExpectationsMissing or written below the level of a graduate student. | 20 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePlan for Sustainability and Dissemination | 15 ptsProficientDetailed and feasible sustainability and dissemination plans.9 ptsAcceptableLimited sustainability and dissemination plans, lacks feasibility. 0 ptsBelow ExpectationsMissing or written below the level of a graduate student. | 15 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA 7th ed. Formatting | 5 ptsProficientThe assignment accurately and consistently follows APA 7th ed. Format [Student edition]. The student has a Title page, introduction, conclusion, headings, in-text citations, and reference page with <=2 errors max.3 ptsAcceptableThe assignment consistently follows current APA 7th ed. (Student Ed.) The student uses Title page, introduction, conclusion, headings, in-text citations, and Reference page). with minor errors 3-4 max. 0 ptsBelow ExpectationsAPA 7th ed. format is not used or is used inconsistently below the level of a graduate-level student despite the resources and instructions provided. | 5 pts |