OnlineNursingOwl
← All nursing posts

Article Writing · Studypool

ENG 121:CBE2-College Composition II

Overview

i added all the milestone i wrote along with the audio script so you have them. each artifact i believe is just a continuance to what i had already wrote. and i need audio script for my procedures for writing these new papers for each artifact.

Artifact 1

Overview

Identify a set of topics typically explored in three distinct academic disciplines that you would like to explore throughout the writing assignments in this competency. Write a paper where you 1) describe the three academic disciplines you have selected, 2) discuss the topics explored within each discipline that you find interesting, 3) identify six scholarly sources within the disciplinary areas written in the topics discussed that you have found using the library's academic databases, and 4) answer the six questions provided below. Include a minimum of two sources from each of the three disciplines that you originally discussed, and ensure that each source is representative of the inquiry and approach typical of the academic discipline it represents. Carefully read each source and then answer the following questions in your paper:
  1. What are the similarities and differences between how each discipline structures the presentation of information?
  2. What are the similarities and differences between the conventions, analytical approaches, and discourse patterns of each discipline?
  3. Are there differences in how evidence is identified and knowledge created in each discipline?
  4. What kinds of information are prioritized? Is there an implied difference in "value" between each discipline?
  5. How is expertise or validity established in each discipline?
  6. How does each discipline uniquely speak to or address a topic of global or personal significance that you may wish to explore in later assignments?

Requirements

  1. A minimum of 1000 words of original writing.
  2. A references list with a minimum of 6 sources published with at least one linking in-text citation to each entry in the references list. These sources must all be high-quality studies, formal reports, academic books, or peer-reviewed studies. You can obtain these sources from the library's databases (e.g., Academic Search Complete, JSTOR, ERIC) or an affiliated scholarly repository. In general, if a source does not have expert authors who study the topic professionally, does not examine the subject using a defined disciplinary approach, and lacks a references list, it does not qualify as a scholarly source.
  3. Double-spaced text, with no extra spacing before or after paragraphs, written in 12-point Times New Roman font, with standard margins (1" on all sides).
  4. Proofread to be free of all grammatical and spelling errors.
  5. Close adherence to all assignment directions.
  6. Formatted in MLA 9.
  7. Submitted in the Microsoft Word file format (.docx or .doc).

Artifact 2

Overview

Write a paper where you identify one of the disciplinary perspectives described in the first milestone assignment and consider how that discipline constructs arguments by establishing claims, identifying evidence, and connecting both using implicit and explicit assumptions. Identify six high-quality academic sources written by scholars of that specific discipline and examine the reasoning and analytical processes they have used. Carefully read and annotate each source and then consider the following questions as you develop your response:

  1. What are the standards of evidence, support, and justification?
  2. What are the dominant assumptions and beliefs within the discipline?
  3. What are the consistent means of interpretation of data and evidence?
  4. What are the common methodological approaches used by scholars in the discipline?
  5. How do your beliefs, values, and assumptions compare with those of the discipline you have examined?

Requirements

  1. A minimum of 1000 words of original writing.
  2. A references list with a minimum of 6 sources published with at least one linking in-text citation to each entry in the references list. These sources must all be high-quality studies, formal reports, academic books, or peer-reviewed studies. You can obtain these sources from the library's databases (e.g., Academic Search Complete, JSTOR, ERIC) or an affiliated scholarly repository. In general, if a source does not have expert authors who study the topic professionally, does not examine the subject using a defined disciplinary approach, and lacks a references list, it does not qualify as a scholarly source.
  3. Double-spaced text, with no extra spacing before or after paragraphs, written in 12-point Times New Roman font, with standard margins (1" on all sides).
  4. Proofread to be free of all grammatical and spelling errors.
  5. Close adherence to all assignment directions.
  6. Formatted in MLA 9.
  7. Submitted in the Microsoft Word file format (.docx or .doc).

Artifact 3

Overview

Now that you have identified multiple disciplinary perspectives and explored one in detail, it is time for you to demonstrate your understanding of the conventions of a single discipline by writing a research paper on a topic of your choice within a discipline you have explored in this competency. It is strongly recommended that you complete Milestone 3 using the discipline you explored in Milestone 2. Ensure that your research paper is written in a manner appropriately structured using the conventions, terminology, assumptions, and sources appropriate for the discipline. Subfields of a major discipline are acceptable areas of exploration for this research paper; for example, botany, zoology, and entomology are subfields of biology.

Requirements

  1. A minimum of 1000 words of original writing.
  2. A references list with a minimum of 6 sources published with at least one linking in-text citation to each entry in the references list. These sources must all be high-quality studies, formal reports, academic books, or peer-reviewed studies. You can obtain these sources from the library's databases (e.g., Academic Search Complete, JSTOR, ERIC) or an affiliated scholarly repository. In general, if a source does not have expert authors who study the topic professionally, does not examine the subject using a defined disciplinary approach, and lacks a references list, it does not qualify as a scholarly source.
  3. Double-spaced text, with no extra spacing before or after paragraphs, written in 12-point Times New Roman font, with standard margins (1" on all sides).
  4. Proofread to be free of all grammatical and spelling errors.
  5. Close adherence to all assignment directions.
  6. Formatted in MLA 9.
  7. Submitted in the Microsoft Word file format (.docx or .doc).