Antecedent-Based Strategies and Replacement-Based Strategies

Overview

This week’s assignment is the first step toward creating a behavior intervention support plan for a case study client. The behavior plans you develop as a behavior analyst must be evidence based. For this first assignment, you will identify an antecedent-based strategy and a replacement behavior that are function-based, (i.e., connected to the function of the client’s problem behavior) and use the library to search for the literature supporting the use of these strategies.

Preparation

To prepare for writing your assignment, complete the following:

• Familiarize yourself with the case study client given to you by your instructor.
  • Identify the target behavior and begin to develop your rationale for selecting it.
  • What was the assessment process followed?
  • What was the function of the problem behavior?
• Choose one antecedent-based strategy and use the library to conduct a literature search to support this strategy. If you need help using the library, refer to the MS in Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) Research GuideLinks to an external site..
• Choose a replacement behavior and a replacement-based strategy. Be sure the behavior is functioned-based and connected to the function of the client’s problem behavior. Use the library to conduct a literature search to support those strategies.

Instructions

Using the Antecedent-Based Strategies and Replacement-Based Strategies Template [DOCX], write a paper that includes the following:

Part 1 Case Study and Target Behavior

• Summarize the case study you are using for your assignments.
  • Identify and define the target (problem) behavior in your case study.
    • Your definition must be objective, specific, and measurable so your instructor can understand what is and what is not an example of the problem target behavior.
  • State the function of the problem behavior.
    • Justify the function based on the data.

Part 2 Antecedent Strategies

• Describe one antecedent-based strategy that could be used to prevent the behavior from recurring.
  • This strategy should be function-based, (i.e., connected to the function of the problem behavior)
  • In addition, explain how compassionate approaches were considered when selecting the strategy. Refer to the Capella Compassion Code [PDF] .
• Use at least two recent scholarly or professional resources to support the use of your chosen antecedent-based strategy.
  • Explain how the common, relevant ABA concepts, principles, and methods used in the studies can be used to modify the behavior identified in your case study.
  • Explain whether the interventions in the studies can be considered compassionate and least intrusive. Refer to the Capella Compassion Code [PDF] .

Part 3 Replacement Behavior and Strategies

• Explain how a replacement behavior is connected to the function of the client's problem behavior.
  • Describe how the behavior is functioned-based and connected to the function of the client’s problem behavior. How will this replacement behavior result in the maintaining reinforcer?
  • Describe one strategy to teach and reinforce the replacement behavior and one strategy to maintain the replacement behavior.
  • In addition, explain how compassionate approaches were considered when selecting and implementing the strategies. Refer to the Capella Compassion Code [PDF].
• Use at least two scholarly or professional resources to support the use of your chosen replacement-based strategy for teaching and reinforcing the replacement behavior.
  • Explain how common, relevant ABA concepts, principles, and methods used in the studies can be used to teach and maintain the replacement behavior.
  • Explain whether the interventions in the studies can be considered compassionate and least intrusive. Refer to the Capella Compassion Code [PDF].

Be sure to complete the self-assessment grading rubric included in the template.

Additional Requirements

• Written communication: Should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
• APA formatting: References and citations are formatted according to current APA style guidelines. Refer to the Writing CenterLinks to an external site. as needed.
• Resources: 4 scholarly or professional resources.
• Length: 3–4 double-spaced content pages plus title page and reference list.
• Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 points.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and rubric criteria:

• Competency 1: Recommend intervention goals based on client preferences, supporting environments, risks, constraints, and social validity.
  • Objectively define the target behavior and accurately describe the function identified in the case study.
• Competency 2: Design research-based interventions for individual cases based on the principles of applied behavior analysis.
  • Recommend an antecedent-based intervention based on literature.
  • Explain how the literature supports the chosen antecedent-based intervention.
  • Recommend an intervention for teaching and reinforcing the replacement behavior based on literature.
  • Recommend an intervention for maintaining the replacement behavior based on literature.
  • Explain how the literature supports the chosen interventions for teaching, reinforcing, and maintaining the replacement behavior.
• Competency 4: Develop compassionate interventions.
  • Identify compassionate approaches in the interventions described in the studies.
  • Identify compassionate approaches in the interventions described in the studies.
• Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly and consistent with expectations for professionals in the field of psychology.
  • Demonstrate an academic writing style through well-organized prose that follows assignment guidelines.
  • Demonstrate compliance with APA style, citation, and referencing guidelines.
  • Include a self-assessment grading rubric that is mostly accurate with few errors.

Week 4 Assignment: Antecedent-Based Strategies and Replacement-Based Strategies

Week 4 Assignment: Antecedent-Based Strategies and Replacement-Based Strategies
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Objectively define the target behavior and accurately describe the function identified in the case study.	18 to >15.3 pts DISTINGUISHED Defines the target behavior and function identified in the case study in an objective, specific, and measurable manner. 15.3 to >12.6 pts PROFICIENT Objectively defines the target behavior and accurately describes the function identified in the case study. 12.6 to >0 pts BASIC Attempts to define the target behavior and function identified in the case study, but the target behavior is not objectively defined. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not define the target behavior or function identified in the case study.	/ 18 pts
Recommend an antecedent-based intervention based on literature.	18 to >15.3 pts DISTINGUISHED Recommends an antecedent-based intervention and explains how the Capella Compassion Code was considered when selecting the strategy. 15.3 to >12.6 pts PROFICIENT Recommends an antecedent-based intervention based on literature. 12.6 to >0 pts BASIC Recommends an antecedent-based intervention, but it is not supported by the literature or appropriate for the target behavior. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not recommend an antecedent-based intervention based on literature.	/ 18 pts
Explain how the literature supports the chosen antecedent-based intervention.	18 to >15.3 pts DISTINGUISHED Uses recent and relevant studies to explain how the literature supports the chosen antecedent-based intervention. 15.3 to >12.6 pts PROFICIENT Explains how the literature supports the chosen antecedent-based intervention. 12.6 to >0 pts BASIC Explains how the literature supports the chosen antecedent-based intervention, but the explanation is unclear or missing key details. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not explain how the literature supports the chosen antecedent-based intervention.	/ 18 pts
Identify compassionate approaches in the interventions described in the studies.	18 to >15.3 pts DISTINGUISHED Identifies compassionate approaches in the interventions described in the studies and provides an example to illustrate how this intervention considers a compassionate approach. 15.3 to >12.6 pts PROFICIENT Identifies compassionate approaches in the interventions described in the studies. 12.6 to >0 pts BASIC Attempts to identify compassionate approaches in the interventions described in the studies, but the discussion is inaccurate or incomplete. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not identify compassionate approaches in the interventions described in the studies.	/ 18 pts
Recommend an intervention for teaching and reinforcing the replacement behavior based on literature.	18 to >15.3 pts DISTINGUISHED Recommends an intervention for teaching and reinforcing the replacement behavior and explains how the Capella Compassion Code was considered when selecting the strategy. 15.3 to >12.6 pts PROFICIENT Recommends an intervention for teaching and reinforcing the replacement behavior based on literature. 12.6 to >0 pts BASIC Recommends an intervention for teaching and reinforcing the replacement behavior, but it is not supported by the literature or appropriate for the replacement behavior. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not recommend an intervention for teaching and reinforcing the replacement behavior based on literature.	/ 18 pts
Recommend an intervention for maintaining the replacement behavior based on literature.	18 to >15.3 pts DISTINGUISHED Recommends an intervention for maintaining the replacement behavior based on literature and explains how the Capella Compassion Code was considered when selecting the strategy. 15.3 to >12.6 pts PROFICIENT Recommends an intervention for maintaining the replacement behavior based on literature. 12.6 to >0 pts BASIC Recommends an intervention for maintaining the replacement behavior, but it is not supported by the literature or appropriate for the replacement behavior. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not recommend an intervention for maintaining the replacement behavior based on literature.	/ 18 pts
Explain how the literature supports the chosen interventions for teaching, reinforcing, and maintaining the replacement behavior.	18 to >15.3 pts DISTINGUISHED Uses recent and relevant studies to explain how the literature supports the chosen interventions. 15.3 to >12.6 pts PROFICIENT Explains how the literature supports the chosen interventions for teaching, reinforcing, and maintaining the replacement behavior. 12.6 to >0 pts BASIC Explains how the literature supports the chosen interventions for teaching, reinforcing, and maintaining the replacement behavior, but the explanation is unclear or missing key details. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not explain how the literature supports the chosen interventions for teaching, reinforcing, and maintaining the replacement behavior.	/ 18 pts
Identify compassionate approaches in the interventions described in the studies.	18 to >15.3 pts DISTINGUISHED Identifies compassionate approaches in the interventions described in the studies and provides an example to illustrate how this intervention considers a compassionate approach. 15.3 to >12.6 pts PROFICIENT Identifies compassionate approaches in the interventions described in the studies. 12.6 to >0 pts BASIC Attempts to identify compassionate approaches in the interventions described in the studies, but the discussion is inaccurate or incomplete. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not identify compassionate approaches in the interventions described in the studies.	/ 18 pts
Demonstrate an academic writing style through well-organized prose that follows assignment guidelines.	18 to >15.3 pts DISTINGUISHED Demonstrates an academic writing style through well-organized prose that contains no significant grammatical or mechanical errors and follows assignment guidelines. 15.3 to >12.6 pts PROFICIENT Demonstrates an academic writing style through well-organized prose that follows assignment guidelines. 12.6 to >0 pts BASIC Demonstrates minimally acceptable writing style, with instances of disorganization and grammatical or mechanical errors, or does not follow all assignment guidelines. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not demonstrate an academic writing style.	/ 18 pts
Demonstrate compliance with APA style, citation, and referencing guidelines.	9 to >7.65 pts DISTINGUISHED Develops a paper that is fully compliant with APA style, citation, and referencing guidelines. 7.65 to >6.3 pts PROFICIENT Demonstrates compliance with APA style, citation, and referencing guidelines. 6.3 to >0 pts BASIC Demonstrates minimally acceptable compliance with APA style, citation, and referencing guidelines. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not demonstrate compliance with APA style, citation, and referencing guidelines.	/ 9 pts
Include a self-assessment grading rubric that is mostly accurate with few errors.	9 to >7.65 pts DISTINGUISHED Includes a grading rubric and is accurate with self-assessment. 7.65 to >6.3 pts PROFICIENT Includes a self-assessment grading rubric that is mostly accurate with few errors. 6.3 to >0 pts BASIC Includes a grading rubric but does not accurately assess one's own performance. 0 pts NON_PERFORMANCE Does not include a grading rubric with self-assessed score.	/ 9 pts
Total Points: 0

important clarification regarding the upcoming assignment where you will be developing a behavior intervention plan based on a case study. To ensure depth and focus in your analysis and intervention design, please select ONLY ONE target behavior and its corresponding function from the provided case study to address in your assignment.

While the case studies may present multiple behaviors or potential functions, for the purpose of this assignment, we want you to demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of:

1. Identifying a single, clear target behavior.
2. Determining its primary function.
3. Recommending appropriate interventions based on that specific function.

This approach will allow you to delve deeply into the rationale, strategies, and ethical considerations for a single, well-defined behavioral challenge.