Reminder!
You must submit a narrative version of the peer review to your Peer Review assignment folder in week 10 in order for it to be graded.
- The instructions require "meaningful and substantial feedback" in narrative format. Each of the sections (below) will be worth 10 points.
Peer Review Component
Students are expected to provide their peers with meaningful and substantial feedback. The following questions must be answered in narrative format:
Scenario Clarity & Context
Identify one specific detail from the Scenario Slide that meaningfully helps explain the performance issue, and one missing detail that would improve the functional understanding of the situation. Explain why that missing piece matters.
Pinpoint Quality Check
Evaluate the Pinpoint Slide using behavioral criteria (observable, measurable, passes the dead person’s test, etc.). Which criterion is best met, and which (if any) is weakest? Provide a revised version of the pinpoint if improvement is needed.
PDC-HS Alignment
Select one PDC-HS domain (Training, Task Clarification, Resources, or Performance Consequences) and explain whether the presenter’s conclusions are logically supported by the scenario. Cite a specific example from their slides to justify your evaluation.
Intervention
Does the chosen intervention clearly align with the performance problem identified in the PDC-HS? Point to one element of the intervention that directly addresses the problem and one aspect that may be mismatched, missing, or unnecessary.
Measurement & Data Validity
Evaluate the Measuring Success Slide: What type of data is being collected, and is it appropriate for the pinpointed behavior? Suggest one specific improvement to increase the reliability or validity of the measurement system.