Overview
Please this is a continuation of the last assignment from yesterday. number 1 and 2 are the additional comments from the professor we discussed yesterday. The rest of the numbers are the additions to the new assignment Please do not separate this assignment from the last assignment from yesterday
1) The scores you generate need to be based upon performance of the systems against multiple types of organisms (virus, spore etc.) under multiple types of situations (liquid, blood, plastic etc.). Additionally you need to have concrete examples of specific pieces of hardware (size, weight, cost, throughput etc.)
2) you only have 5 references for three identified technologies. This is not nearly enough to provide the data needed for a complete analysis of these technologies.
3)my group decided to use 2.2 or higher of the total weight score as the basis of a solution that is in scope. in this case Autoclave will be the only solution that will be in scope meaning that will work best on the Aircraft which is okay if that is what the scores says.
4) we have explain why we scored each solution by each assessment criteria from space conservation to cost
5)any solution that scored below 2.2 is a poor solution or out of scope. explain why itis out of scope orpoorforthe Aircraft
6) Best criteria for each solution and why that criteria scored higher (from Space conservation to Cost)
7) Worst criteria for each solution and why that low score explain
8) which of the solutions are stand alone solutions( they do not require additional supporting materials to operate) explain the benefits and importance of it.
9) I have attached the pictures of each solution you currently chose to the assessment matrix. please score the matrix to get each total weight score of 2.3 for AutoclaVe, 2 for Microwave and 2.05 for reactive plasma
9) I have added different models of each for comparison. Sterilwave100 model for radiation base microwave, Systec Autoclave , Alter NRG PLASMA GASIFICATION. Please just a brief explanation why your solutions would work better than mine. you have to brief research.