Overview
To prepare for class on you will write a synopsis of the article in no more than 300 words highlighting the following aspects.
???Why did the authors perform the experiments?
???What methods did you find interesting from the study?
???What conclusions did the authors reach?
- ???What was the significance of the main finding of the paper?
Part II
- Prepare a 5 minute synopsis of the main points of the allocated article section to give to the class. Use the questions/points below to guide your analysis but don't limit yourselves to just those points. You can have one or more members of the group present. If desired you can use slides, other media or images from the article to aid your presentation. Try not to get too caught in the weeds with details and think big-picture, what are the most important points in this section.
Points you may want to address in your article analysis and presentationIntroduction1. Authorship & Collaboration: who was involved in this study? Were the scientists involved in this study working in the same lab at the same institution? If a number of labs or institutions collaborated, in what way may that have been important to the study?2. What is the specific area of research that this study is about? 3. Is it a hypothesis driven paper or observational/other?4. Describe the pertinent background information that it is imperative that we know before we can understand the findings of this study.5. What did you have to research further in order to understand this study and could it have been included in the manuscript? Methods1. Describe the main techniques used in the study - think big picture a diagram or table may help2. What statistical analysis was used? 3. What flaws are there in the methods used in the study? What would you have liked to have also seen?4. What questions do you still have, what is unclear or excluded?Results1. Describe the main findings and overview of the important results, you can use figures from the paper here2. Discuss the most interesting results and what makes this study impressive3. Are there errors in their data? Could things have been presented in a better way?Conclusion/Discussion1. What conclusions did the authors made from the results?2. Are the authors mis-representing the significance of the data or are their claims grander than the data presented?3. What is the next step after this study? What would you love to see them do next?