Executive Summary Format Topic: Animal Biotechnology

Overview

1. Guidlines
2. Read the required readings as stated in this module's "Readings and Resources" section. They are textbooks, research papers, technical instructions, and BCC reports on M09: Reading and Resources (eReserves).
3. Watch the "Experimental & Technical" videos to learn about the techniques used in Biotechnology.
4. Write an Executive Summary of What you have learned this week. Your submission should be one to two (1-2) pages, double-spaced, and about 500 words. It should contain proper grammar, be free of spelling errors, and reflect critical and original thought. Use appropriate APA formatted references and citations (references do not count towards page length).

• Objectives

1. Summarize the impact of animal biotechnology on emerging research. [Aligns with C1, C2]
2. Analyze the rationale for applying standard laboratory methods in biotechnology applications. [Aligns with C6]

• Outline
• Outline for Module 9 Executive Summary: The topic for this module is Animal Biotechnology.
  1. Statement of purpose: Summarize the biotechnology techniques discussed in Module 9 to answer the questions: Who are the experts in these fields? Is this your audience?
  2. Purpose of communication: Who, What, Why, When, Where, and How?
     1. Discuss the biotechnology techniques in Module 9.
     2. Explain their significance, advantages, and limitations.
     3. What scientific disciplines intersect with biotechnology, and how have they historically contributed to its development?
  3. Summary of Results: What does this mean?
     1. How do researchers determine the suitability of an animal model for drug studies, and what are some notable medical breakthroughs achieved through this approach?
     2. What are the advantages and constraints of utilizing "organ on a chip" technology compared to traditional animal models, and how do current regulations ensure the ethical treatment of animals in research?
     3. Can you outline the steps in cloning an animal post-gene transfer and discuss the significance of monoclonal antibodies, nuclear transfer, and transgenic animals in advancing medical research and treatment?
     4. Other examples from the material listed in Module 9 that you would like to highlight.
  4. Conclusions: Why does this matter?
     1. Use the data you have to support your findings. Cite your work.
  5. Call to action: actions and who should take them.
     1. This is your opportunity to demonstrate your subject matter expertise (SME). Be clear and deliberate with your thoughts. Have confidence in your knowledge.
     2. Select a specific industry where the discussed techniques can be applied.
     3. Justify your choice with a citation or a reference to current trends or needs in the industry.
     4. Outline the potential benefits and challenges of implementing these techniques in the chosen industry.

• Considerations

As you develop your executive summary, you must consider several things.

1. Who is your audience? Consider the area of knowledge and who the experts are, and then write to inform them.
2. Defining the purpose. This is why, what, when, how, and who. Why is this worthwhile? What is the problem? When is this relevant? How can it be applied? Who benefits from it? Who is harmed?
3. Consider the structure of your executive summary. Each section should be clear and appropriately headed, with the organization of the section transitioning into the next section.
4. Write clearly and concisely. Edit your paper. There should be no grammatical or spelling errors. With only one or two pages, every word matters. Additionally, do not assume that readers know your abbreviations; if you have an abbreviation, include the long version first. In technical documents, vocabulary or keyword lists are included with all the abbreviations used in the document.
5. Use clear and quantifiable examples and data to highlight the benefits. Write concisely. For example, 200 apples double the income earned over 100 apples. Compared to: more apples means more money. While the second example is true, it has less weight for a decision-maker. While this is a silly example, use quantifiable data when possible because it will be noticed. More importantly, having appropriate data in your summary demonstrates your subject matter expertise.
6. The conclusion should include a call to action. If you need funds for your project, if you need manpower, if you need their engagement, state that clearly; don’t be shy. Finally, always include a deadline when you write a summary of when you expect a response. For this assignment, the date for practice should be the date that the summary is due.

• Rubric

The rubric provided below uses the following criteria:

1. Statement of Purpose: Audience and Significance
2. Purpose of Communication: Who, What, Why, When, Where, and How?
3. Summary of the Results: What this means.
4. Conclusions: Why this matters.
5. Call to action: What needs to happen now that this information is known?
6. Format: Use APA format

Executive Summary Rubric [EAB, 20 points]

Executive Summary Rubric [EAB, 20 points]

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStatement of PurposeStatement of Purpose: Audience and significance.	3 to >2.7 pts Exemplary The statement of purpose identifies who the audience is and what is to be accomplished (refer to the executive summary outline guidance). 2.7 to >2.4 pts Proficient The statement of purpose identifies who the audience is but is unclear on what is to be accomplished. 2.4 to >2.0 pts Apprentice Neither the audience's identification nor what is to be accomplished is clear, but they are vaguely identified. 2 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory There is no statement of purpose.	3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePurpose of CommunicationPurpose of communication: Who, What, Why, When, Where, and How?	3 to >2.7 pts Exemplary The essential questions at the module's beginning are evaluated and used to frame the executive summary communication. 2.7 to >2.4 pts Proficient There is evidence that the essential questions were considered. 2.4 to >2.0 pts Apprentice There is little evidence that the essential questions were considered. 2 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory There is no evidence that the essential questions at the beginning of the module were used to inform the executive summary.	3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary of the ResultsSummary of the Results: What this means.	3 to >2.7 pts Exemplary This summary demonstrates the knowledge gained. Correct use of terms, discussion of the information, and appropriate understanding are shown throughout. 2.7 to >2.4 pts Proficient The summary demonstrates the knowledge gained with only 1 or 2 minor inaccuracies in understanding. 2.4 to >2.0 pts Apprentice The summary has 3 or more inaccuracies in understanding. 2 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory There is no evidence in the summary of knowledge gained from this module.	3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusionsConclusions: Why this matters.	3 to >2.7 pts Exemplary The conclusion(s) drawn in the summary are well supported by the evidence provided. 2.7 to >2.4 pts Proficient The conclusion(s) drawn in the summary are mostly supported by the evidence provided. 2.4 to >2.0 pts Apprentice The conclusion(s) provided in the summary are not supported by evidence or are not supported by the evidence provided. 2 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory There is no conclusion.	3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCall to ActionCall to action: What needs to happen now that this information is known?	3 to >2.7 pts Exemplary Clear and concise written call to action. Both the actions to be taken and who should take them are identified. 2.7 to >2.4 pts Proficient The call to action is provided, and what actions and who should take them are identified. However, they need some clarity. 2.4 to >2.0 pts Apprentice There is a call to action; however, neither what actions are needed nor who needs to take them are identified. Additional clarity is needed. 2 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory There is no call to action.	3 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormattingFormatting of the document.	5 to >4.5 pts Exemplary The summary is the appropriate length. APA formatting, references, and citations are appropriately used. There are no grammar or spelling errors. The summary is submitted on time. 4.5 to >4.0 pts Proficient The summary is the appropriate length. Small errors in APA. No more than two grammatical or spelling errors. The summary is on time. 4 to >3.33 pts Apprentice The summary may not be the appropriate length. There are errors in the APA formatting, but an attempt was made. There are three or more grammatical or spelling errors. The summary is on time. 3.33 to >0 pts Unsatisfactory Exceeds two pages or dramatically reduced. APA references, citations, and formatting are not applied. The summary was not submitted on time.	5 pts
Total Points: 20