OnlineNursingOwl
← All nursing posts

Biology · Studypool

Executive Summary Format Topic: Fingerprinting and Forensic Analysis

Post ID: 3266613

Overview

  1. Read the required readings as stated in this module's "Readings and Resources" section. They are textbooks, research papers, technical instructions, and BCC reports on M10: Reading and Resources (eReserves).
  2. Watch the "Experimental & Technical" videos to learn about the techniques used in Biotechnology.
  3. Write an Executive Summary of What you have learned this week. Your submission should be one to two (1-2) pages, double-spaced, and about 500 words. It should contain proper grammar, be free of spelling errors, and reflect critical and original thought. Use appropriate APA formatted references and citations (references do not count towards page length).

objective:

  1. Summarize the DNA fingerprinting and forensic analysis process. [Aligns with C1, C2]
  2. Analyze the rationale for the application of standard laboratory methods in biotechnology applications. [Aligns with C6]

Outline:

Outline for Module 10 Executive Summary: Fingerprinting and Foresnsic Analysis.

  1. Statement of purpose: Summarize the biotechnology techniques discussed in Module 10 to answer the questions: Who are the experts in these fields? Is this your audience?
  2. Purpose of communication: Who, What, Why, When, Where, and How?
    1. Discuss the biotechnology techniques in Module 10.
    2. Explain their significance, advantages, and limitations.
    3. What scientific disciplines intersect with biotechnology, and how have they historically contributed to its development?
  3. Summary of Results: What does this mean?
    1. How does the risk of contamination impact the integrity of DNA evidence throughout the collection and analysis process, and what protocols are essential to mitigate this risk?
    2. In what ways has PCR-based DNA analysis improved upon RFLP methods, and how has this advancement influenced forensic science?
    3. How do DNA profiles determine genetic relationships and individual identities, and what role do they play in fields beyond forensics, such as medical diagnostics and food authenticity testing?
    4. Other examples from the material listed in Module 10 that you would like to highlight.
  4. Conclusions: Why does this matter?
    1. Use the data you have to support your findings. Cite your work.
  6. Call to action: actions and who should take them.
    1. This is your opportunity to demonstrate your subject matter expertise (SME). Be clear and deliberate with your thoughts. Have confidence in your knowledge.
    2. Select a specific industry where the discussed techniques can be applied.
    3. Justify your choice with a citation or a reference to current trends or needs in the industry.
    4. Outline the potential benefits and challenges of implementing these techniques in the chosen industry.
    As you develop your executive summary, you must consider several things.
    1. Who is your audience? Consider the area of knowledge and who the experts are, and then write to inform them.
    2. Defining the purpose. This is why, what, when, how, and who. Why is this worthwhile? What is the problem? When is this relevant? How can it be applied? Who benefits from it? Who is harmed?
    3. Consider the structure of your executive summary. Each section should be clear and appropriately headed, with the organization of the section transitioning into the next section.
    4. Write clearly and concisely. Edit your paper. There should be no grammatical or spelling errors. With only one or two pages, every word matters. Additionally, do not assume that readers know your abbreviations; if you have an abbreviation, include the long version first. In technical documents, vocabulary or keyword lists are included with all the abbreviations used in the document.
    5. Use clear and quantifiable examples and data to highlight the benefits. Write concisely. For example, 200 apples double the income earned over 100 apples. Compared to: more apples means more money. While the second example is true, it has less weight for a decision-maker. While this is a silly example, use quantifiable data when possible because it will be noticed. More importantly, having appropriate data in your summary demonstrates your subject matter expertise.
    6. The conclusion should include a call to action. If you need funds for your project, if you need manpower, if you need their engagement, state that clearly; don’t be shy. Finally, always include a deadline when you write a summary of when you expect a response. For this assignment, the date for practice should be the date that the summary is due.
    The rubric provided below uses the following criteria:
    1. Statement of Purpose: Audience and Significance
    2. Purpose of Communication: Who, What, Why, When, Where, and How?
    3. Summary of the Results: What this means.
    4. Conclusions: Why this matters.
    5. Call to action: What needs to happen now that this information is known?
    6. Format: Use APA format
    Executive Summary Rubric [EAB, 20 points]
    Executive Summary Rubric [EAB, 20 points]
    CriteriaRatingsPts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStatement of PurposeAudience and significance.
    3 to >2.7 ptsExemplaryThe statement of purpose identifies who the audience is and what is to be accomplished (refer to the executive summary outline guidance).2.7 to >2.4 ptsProficientThe statement of purpose identifies who the audience is but is unclear on what is to be accomplished.2.4 to >2.0 ptsApprenticeNeither the audience's identification nor what is to be accomplished is clear, but they are vaguely identified.2 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryThere is no statement of purpose.
    		3 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePurpose of CommunicationWho, What, Why, When, Where, and How?
    3 to >2.7 ptsExemplaryThe essential questions at the module's beginning are evaluated and used to frame the executive summary communication.2.7 to >2.4 ptsProficientThere is evidence that the essential questions were considered.2.4 to >2.0 ptsApprenticeThere is little evidence that the essential questions were considered.2 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryThere is no evidence that the essential questions at the beginning of the module were used to inform the executive summary.
    		3 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary of the ResultsWhat this means.
    3 to >2.7 ptsExemplaryThis summary demonstrates the knowledge gained. Correct use of terms, discussion of the information, and appropriate understanding are shown throughout.2.7 to >2.4 ptsProficientThe summary demonstrates the knowledge gained with only 1 or 2 minor inaccuracies in understanding.2.4 to >2.0 ptsApprenticeThe summary has 3 or more inaccuracies in understanding.2 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryThere is no evidence in the summary of knowledge gained from this module.
    		3 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusionsWhy this matters.
    3 to >2.7 ptsExemplaryThe conclusion(s) drawn in the summary are well supported by the evidence provided.2.7 to >2.4 ptsProficientThe conclusion(s) drawn in the summary are mostly supported by the evidence provided.2.4 to >2.0 ptsApprenticeThe conclusion(s) provided in the summary are not supported by evidence or are not supported by the evidence provided.2 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryThere is no conclusion.
    		3 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCall to ActionWhat needs to happen now that this information is known?
    3 to >2.7 ptsExemplaryClear and concise written call to action. Both the actions to be taken and who should take them are identified.2.7 to >2.4 ptsProficientThe call to action is provided, and what actions and who should take them are identified. However, they need some clarity.2.4 to >2.0 ptsApprenticeThere is a call to action; however, neither what actions are needed nor who needs to take them are identified. Additional clarity is needed.2 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryThere is no call to action.
    		3 pts
    This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting
    5 to >4.5 ptsExemplaryThe summary is the appropriate length. APA formatting, references, and citations are appropriately used. There are no grammar or spelling errors. The summary is submitted on time.4.5 to >4.0 ptsProficientThe summary is the appropriate length. Small errors in APA. No more than two grammatical or spelling errors. The summary is on time.4 to >3.33 ptsApprenticeThe summary may not be the appropriate length. There are errors in the APA formatting, but an attempt was made. There are three or more grammatical or spelling errors. The summary is on time.3.33 to >0 ptsUnsatisfactoryExceeds two pages or dramatically reduced. APA references, citations, and formatting are not applied. The summary was not submitted on time.
    		5 pts
    Total Points: 20