Continu the presantation

Post ID: 3378766

Overview

these are the check points that the slides should have them. And also please write what to say on eaxh slide in details and nie max 12 mins. I am going to add the powerpoints here so please compelete the power point for the presantation so i can use it

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle Slide InformationThe first slide includes the project title, student name, course name, & date as the information requested in the checkpoint description.

1 pts

Exemplary

Meets all criteria

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Did not complete

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent SlidesThe PPT includes information as requested in the project description. -Slides 2 to 8 follow the guidelines in the project description.

7 to >4.0 pts

Exemplary

Meets all measures and incorporates all seven (7) criteria on the guidelines.

4 to >0.0 pts

Satisfactory

Incorporates 4 to 6 criteria from the guidelines

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Incorporate from 0 to 3 criteria from the guidelines.

7 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferencesThe amount of references and resources is higher than 5. Most of the resources are journal articles. Four (4) of the articles are the original sources of the research. The resources are listed in alphabetical order. The references follow a consistent format. The references follow the project description guidelines.

1 pts

Exemplary

Meets all criteria

0.5 pts

Satisfactory

Meets some criteria

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Does not include the references

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting of the slidesEach slide has a distinct topic. Use at least one image per slide that shows depth, clarity, size, and reasonable resolution. Use of image citations within slides. Good layout distribution implementing the 4x6 rule (clarity vs. clutter) The slides follow the project description guidelines.

1 pts

Exemplary

Meets all criteria; images are easy to see, with a good layout distribution and excellent depth/clarity; consistently applies the 4x6 rule.

0.5 pts

Satisfactory

Meets some criteria. Some images may lack proper depth, clarity, or size; and considers clarity vs clutter.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Two or more criteria are not met.

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVT requirementsA narration is presented for each slide. Use of Doodle function The audio is clear & easily understandable The VT follows the project description guidelines.

1 pts

Exemplary

Meets all criteria

0.5 pts

Satisfactory

One of the criteria is not met.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Two or more criteria are not met.

1 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganizationThe organization follows the project description guidelines.

4 pts

Exemplary

Meets all criteria. The presentation flows and is well organized.

2 pts

Satisfactory

Presentation fairly solid but with some identifiable flaws

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Poor presentation obscures clarity. Do not follow the organization's guidelines.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent/ResearchThe research content follows the project description guidelines.

4 pts

Exemplary

Meets all criteria. Adequate content explicitly related to award winner; demonstrates a keen and mature understanding of relevant content and research and applies it consistently and appropriately; shows a graduate level of analysis and research

2 pts

Satisfactory

Some content explicitly relates to Nobel/Lasker winner; demonstrates an acceptable level of content knowledge and research; application is acceptable but inconsistent.

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Content does not relate to Nobel/Lasker winners; content knowledge and research is not acceptable; application is weak and/or inappropriate

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical ThinkingThe research presents deep critical thinking that follows the project description guidelines.

4 pts

Exemplary

Meets all criteria. Shows excellent and well-developed cognitive skills in thinking and reasoning; emphasis on originality.

2 pts

Satisfactory

Satisfactory cognitive skills demonstrated, showing average depth of thought; minimal originality

0 pts

Unsatisfactory

Weak or no demonstration of cognitive skills; lack of originality

4 pts

Total Points: 23