Overview
Discussion: Business Integrity, God’s Perspective, and Decision Models Assignment InstructionsDiscussion Thread:
The seventh and final discussion in this class will focus on a three questions in the areas of Integrity, God’s Perspective on Integrity, and Decision Models. The student should organize their main thread by using the bolded headings provided and then respond to the question. The student will post a reply to a single main thread and should organize their reply by using the bolded headings provided.
Demonstrating integrity is just as important for a business as it is for an individual. Those responsible for developing and executing strategy must have a solid understanding what it is and why it is important to business success. God has provided countless examples of integrity in His word and knowing how to apply those to business will help develop business integrity. Over the past several weeks you have been evaluating and trying several decision models, have you settled on one or a group of them?
Minimum of 800 words in the body
Minimum of 2 sources from the literature in addition to course texts
Use bolded headings below in the discussion.
Current APA format must be used.
Use the following outline:
- Introduction
- The Power of Business Integrity ‐ What is business integrity and why is it important to business success? Discuss business integrity and why it is important in no less than 250 words.
- God’s Perspective on Business Integrity - What is God’s perspective on business integrity and why is it important? Using the Keller text and the Bible, discuss God’s perspective on business integrity and why itimportant in no less than 300 words.
- Decision Models ‐ no less than 250 words
- What are my current decision model(s). Discuss your current decision model(s).
- How have your decision model(s) changed throughout the course and why? Discuss how and why your decision model(s) have changed>
Conclusion
Support your factual assertions with citations.
Include an Annotated Bibliography, in current APA format, of the 2 additional Sources:
- Minimum of 250 words in each annotation
- Use the bolded headings below for each annotation
Use the following outline:
Summary of Key Points
Evaluation of the Quality of the Publication
Evaluation of the Quality of the Author(s)
Where this fits into the discussion