Overview
The Discussion questions are based upon a different case study each module and analyze the case scenario/research through a series of questions. The overall structure of each case is similar in that each case begins with an abstract followed by a description of the scenario/research and concludes with a discussion about the situation. The discussion is simply a series of unique questions about each case scenario that you will answer as part of the discussion.
Part 1: Thread
The primary goal of the thread is to thoroughly answer each of the case study questions. Some answers may require a paragraph-style response, whereas others will be best answered with a table or bulleted points. Use the response style that is most appropriate to answer the individual question while ensuring the following are met:
- Each thread will consist of 800 - 1000 words that answer all the assigned case study questions, include 1 biblical application/integration (no more than 10% of the total response) and across all the questions use at least 5 different peer reviewed sources.
- Each case has multiple questions and each question response must be supported with at least 1 peer-reviewed source.
- Use proper grammar and current APA format.
From the State Farm: Dangerous Intersections case, answer the following questions:- Identify the various constructs and concepts involved in the study.
- What hypothesis might drive the research of one of the cities on the top 10 dangerous intersection list?
- Evaluate the methodology for State Farm’s research.
- If you were State Farm, how would you address the concerns of transportation engineers?
- If you were State Farm, would you use traffic volume counts as part of the 2003 study? What concerns, other than those expressed by Nepomuceno, do you have?