Competencies
333.4.2 : Communicates to Resolve Problems
The learner communicates with users to understand, diagnose, and resolve technical problems.
333.4.3 : Analyzes Organizational Culture
The learner analyzes how to work effectively within an organization’s culture.
Introduction
Every organization has departments or groups with different priorities, communication styles, and levels of technological understanding, and IT helpdesk staff must be able to navigate these differences professionally to resolve issues efficiently while maintaining positive user relationships. Strong communication skills help technicians gather accurate information and diagnose problems more efficiently. IT helpdesk staff must be able to ask the right questions, listen actively, and translate technical language into terms users can understand. Task 2 is a continuation of Task 1. You will continue in your role as a tier 1 IT support technician with Kretsmart’s IT helpdesk. In this task, you will develop a strategic communication proposal to improve cross-departmental collaboration, based on patterns observed during the recent infrastructure outage. Your proposal will identify communication barriers, suggest targeted collaboration strategies, and recommend evidence-based improvements to ensure timely, accurate issue reporting in future incidents.
Scenario
You are continuing in your role as a tier 1 IT support technician with Kretsmart’s IT helpdesk. Your goal is to develop a strategic communication proposal to improve cross-departmental collaboration, based on patterns observed during the recent infrastructure outage from Task 1. Read the attached “Kretsmart Communication Breakdown” and complete the task requirements. Note: You must rely only on the scenario and sample communication data provided to complete this task. Do not invent additional events or assume external procedures.
Requirements
Your submission must represent your original work and understanding of the course material. Most performance assessment submissions are automatically scanned through the WGU similarity checker. Students are strongly encouraged to wait for the similarity report to generate after uploading their work and then review it to ensure Academic Authenticity guidelines are met before submitting the file for evaluation. See Understanding Similarity Reports for more information.
Grammarly Note:
Professional Communication will be automatically assessed through Grammarly for Education in most performance assessments before a student submits work for evaluation. Students are strongly encouraged to review the Grammarly for Education feedback prior to submitting work for evaluation, as the overall submission will not pass without this aspect passing. See Use Grammarly for Education Effectively for more information.
Microsoft Files Note:
Write your paper in Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx) unless another Microsoft product, or pdf, is specified in the task directions. Tasks may not be submitted as cloud links, such as links to Google Docs, Google Slides, OneDrive, etc. All supporting documentation, such as screenshots and proof of experience, should be collected in a pdf file and submitted separately from the main file. For more information, please see Computer System and Technology Requirements.
Develop a strategic communication proposal for the IT helpdesk manager at Kretsmart to improve cross-departmental collaboration that includes the following:
Summary of Interactions
A. Prepare a concise summary of your interactions with each of the two employees from the scenario to gather information about the problems they encountered by doing the following:
1. Explain the purpose of gathering essential information about each employee’s experience during the recent outage.
2. Describe how you explained the helpdesk’s troubleshooting process to each employee, tailoring your communication to their level of technical understanding.
3. Describe the expectations you communicated to each employee regarding the outcomes of the troubleshooting process.
Improving Communications
B. Prepare a brief strategic proposal that outlines a plan for fostering improved communication, teamwork, and transparency between the IT team and other departments by doing the following:
1. Describe current communication barriers that are preventing effective communication and collaboration between the IT help desk and other departments, using relevant examples from the scenario.
a. Propose a strategy to foster collaboration and eliminate the barriers described in part B1, using relevant examples from the scenario.
2. Recommend two evidence-based strategies, grounded in the communication patterns, reporting behaviors, and examples provided in the scenario, to support an environment where technical issues are efficiently communicated, identified, and resolved.
C. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
D. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.
File Restrictions
File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! - _ . * ' ( ) File size limit: 200 MB File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, csv, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z
Rubric
A1:DATA COLLECTION
Not Evident An explanation of why essential information about experiences in the recent outage is sought is not provided. | Approaching Competence The explanation of why essential information about experiences in the recent outage is sought is not logical or does not connect to scenario-based details. | Competent The explanation of why essential information about experiences in the recent outage is sought is logical and grounded in the Kretsmart communication scenario data. |
A2:TROUBLESHOOTING
Not Evident A description of the helpdesk’s troubleshooting process is not provided. | Approaching Competence The description does not specifically address the helpdesk’s troubleshooting process, or it is not consistent with the scenario or not appropriate for each employee’s level of technical understanding. | Competent The description specifically addresses the helpdesk’s troubleshooting process, is consistent with the scenario, and is appropriate for each employee’s level of technical understanding. |
A3:EXPECTATIONS
Not Evident An explanation of the expectations for the troubleshooting process outcomes is not provided. | Approaching Competence The explanation of the expectations for the troubleshooting process outcomes is not clear or not appropriate for each employee’s situation. | Competent The explanation of the expectations for the troubleshooting process outcomes is clear and appropriate for each employee’s situation. |
B1:CURRENT BARRIERS
Not Evident A description of current communication barriers preventing effective communication between the IT help desk and other departments is not provided. | Approaching Competence The description does not specifically or accurately address current communication barriers preventing effective communication between the IT help desk and other departments, or the description does not include relevant examples from the scenario. | Competent The description specifically and accurately addresses current communication barriers preventing effective communication between the IT help desk and other departments, and the description includes relevant examples from the scenario. |
B1A:COLLABORATION STRATEGY
Not Evident A strategy to foster collaboration and eliminate barriers is not provided. | Approaching Competence The strategy is not appropriate for fostering collaboration, is not appropriate for the barriers described in part B1, or does not include relevant examples from the scenario. | Competent The strategy to foster collaboration and eliminate barriers is appropriate for the barriers identified in part B1 and includes relevant examples from the scenario. |
B2:STRATEGIES
Not Evident A recommendation of strategies to support an environment where technical issues are efficiently communicated, identified, and resolved is not provided. | Approaching Competence The recommendation includes only 1 strategy, or the strategies are not clearly supported by evidence from the scenario or do not demonstrate how technical issues are efficiently communicated, identified, or resolved. | Competent The recommendation includes 2 strategies that are explicitly supported by evidence from the scenario and demonstrate how technical issues are efficiently communicated, identified, and resolved. |
C:SOURCES
Not Evident The submission does not include both in-text citations and a reference list for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. | Approaching Competence The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list; however, the citations or reference list is incomplete or inaccurate. | Competent The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are properly quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list that accurately identifies the author, date, title, and source location as available. |
D:PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION
Not Evident This submission includes pervasive errors in professional communication related to grammar, sentence fluency, contextual spelling, or punctuation, negatively impacting the professional quality and clarity of the writing. Specific errors have been identified by Grammarly for Education under the Correctness category. | Approaching Competence This submission includes substantial errors in professional communication related to grammar, sentence fluency, contextual spelling, and/or punctuation. Specific errors have been identified by Grammarly for Education under the Correctness category. | Competent This submission includes satisfactory use of grammar, sentence fluency, contextual spelling, and punctuation, which promote accurate interpretation and understanding. |