Competencies
4073.2.1 : Constructs HTML Web Pages
The learner constructs basic web pages using HTML to create structured, accessible content.
4073.2.2 : Applies CSS (Cascading Style Sheets) to Web Pages
The learner applies CSS (Cascading Style Sheets) to style and design visually appealing web pages to enhance user experience.
Introduction
The ability to develop functional, accessible, and visually engaging websites is an essential skill for any aspiring web developer. While AI tools can streamline workflows and enhance productivity, a deep understanding of fundamental web design concepts is crucial, as it empowers you to build with intention, critically assess AI-generated suggestions, and maintain full control over the user experience. This assessment reinforces those essential skills, preparing you to design and troubleshoot web content independently and ethically in a professional environment.
This task is structured in two phases. In Phase I of this assessment, you will create a personal profile web page that demonstrates your understanding of fundamental web development skills, including HTML structure and cascading style sheets (CSS) styling. This single-page website will serve as an introduction to your professional identity. In Phase II, you will use AI responsibly to refine and enhance your work without replacing your foundational code. The final submission will demonstrate your ability to build functional code artifacts and critically reflect on the use of AI in your development process.
Note: Save the following files in a folder named LastName_E009_Task1 (replace “LastName” with your last name):
Use a text editor of your choice (e.g., Visual Studio Code, Notepad++) to create your HTML and CSS files.
Requirements
Your submission must represent your original work and understanding of the course material. Most performance assessment submissions are automatically scanned through the WGU similarity checker. Students are strongly encouraged to wait for the similarity report to generate after uploading their work and then review it to ensure Academic Authenticity guidelines are met before submitting the file for evaluation. See Understanding Similarity Reports for more information.
Grammarly Note:
Professional Communication will be automatically assessed through Grammarly for Education in most performance assessments before a student submits work for evaluation. Students are strongly encouraged to review the Grammarly for Education feedback prior to submitting work for evaluation, as the overall submission will not pass without this aspect passing. See Use Grammarly for Education Effectively for more information.
File Note:
Tasks may not be submitted as cloud links, such as links to Google Docs, Google Slides, OneDrive, etc. All supporting documentation, such as screenshots and proof of experience, should be collected in a pdf file and submitted separately from the main file. For more information, please see Computer System and Technology Requirements.
Phase I: Human‑Only Implementation (Foundational Skills)—You must independently complete and submit the initial implementation of the web page without the use of AI.
A. Create a single-page personal profile web page (index.html) that includes the following:
1. A basic HTML structure, including doctype, head, title, meta tags for character set and viewport, and body element
2. An organization of the body with the following elements:
– About Me
– Skills
– Contact
Note: The internal links in the nav element should link to each of the three sections in the main element.
3. A written HTML code for each of the following elements:
– name label and field using an input element of type "text"
– email label and field using an input element of type "email"
– message label and field using a text area element
– submit button using an input element of type "submit"
B. Create an external CSS style sheet (styles.css) that applies each of the following points to the HTML elements in part A:
– font family
– color
– font size
C. Write an explanation document (.docx) by doing the following:
1. Explain the use of two semantic HTML elements and their purpose, including one relevant code snippet from the web page files for each element to reinforce the explanation.
2. Explain how the design choices for spacing, colors, and typography work together to enhance the user experience, including one relevant code snippet from the web page files to reinforce each explanation.
3. Explain the responsive design approach, including one technique used to ensure the web page adapts to different screen sizes and one relevant code snippet from the web page files to reinforce the explanation.
Phase II: AI‑Supported Refinement (Responsible AI Use)—After completing Phase I, use an AI tool to refine or extend your web page implementation without replacing your foundational code from Phase 1.
D. Use an AI tool to refine your web page submission from Phase I by doing the following:
1. Implement one refinement suggested by an AI tool in part A of Phase I without replacing your foundational code from Phase 1. Include a screen capture of the AI chat as evidence.
2. Implement one refinement suggested by an AI tool in part B of Phase I without replacing your foundational code from Phase 1. Include a screen capture of the AI chat as evidence.
E. Reflect on the AI output by doing the following:
1. Describe two changes suggested by AI.
2. Explain how each AI-suggested change affected the functionality, design, or user experience.
3. Describe one clear lesson learned about using AI in web development.
F. Acknowledge sources, using in-text citations and references, for content that is quoted, paraphrased, or summarized.
G. Demonstrate professional communication in the content and presentation of your submission.
Note: Save the following files in a folder named LastName_E009_Task1 (replace “LastName” with your last name):
Right-click the folder and select Compress (or Send to > Compressed (zipped) folder) to create a single .zip file. Upload the .zip file through the Assessments section of the Student Portal as your final submission.
File Restrictions
File name may contain only letters, numbers, spaces, and these symbols: ! - _ . * ' ( ) File size limit: 200 MB File types allowed: doc, docx, rtf, xls, xlsx, ppt, pptx, odt, pdf, csv, txt, qt, mov, mpg, avi, mp3, wav, mp4, wma, flv, asf, mpeg, wmv, m4v, svg, tif, tiff, jpeg, jpg, gif, png, zip, rar, tar, 7z
Rubric
A1:WEB PAGE STRUCTURE
Not Evident An HTML structure is not provided. | Approaching Competence The HTML structure is missing doctype, head, title, meta tags, or body element, or the structure is not appropriate for web page design. | Competent The HTML structure includes doctype, head, title, meta tags, and body element, and the structure is appropriate for web page design. |
A2:BODY ORGANIZATION
Not Evident An organization of the body is not provided. | Approaching Competence The organization of the body is missing the header, nav, main, or footer elements. Or the nav element is missing 1 or more internal links, or the main element is missing 1 or more sections. | Competent The organization of the body includes the header, nav, main, and footer elements. The nav element includes 3 internal links, and the main element includes 3 sections. |
A3:HTML CODE
Not Evident A written HTML code is not provided. | Approaching Competence The written code is missing HTML for 1 or more of the 5 given elements, or any given element does not include the required number of instances. | Competent The written code includes HTML for each of the 5 given elements, and each given element includes the required number of instances. |
B:EXTERNAL CSS STYLE SHEET
Not Evident An external CSS style sheet is not provided. | Approaching Competence The external CSS style sheet does not include 1 or more of the 9 given points, or any given point is not appropriately applied to the HTML elements in part A. | Competent The external CSS style sheet includes each of the 9 given points, and each given point is appropriately applied to the HTML elements in part A. |
C1:HTML ELEMENTS
Not Evident An explanation of the use of semantic HTML elements is not provided. | Approaching Competence The explanation is missing the use of 1 semantic HTML element or its purpose, or any explanation is not accurate or not reinforced with a relevant code snippet. | Competent The explanation includes the use of 2 semantic HTML elements and their purpose, and each explanation is accurate and reinforced with a relevant code snippet. |
C2:DESIGN CHOICE
Not Evident An explanation of how the design choices work together to enhance the user experience is not provided. | Approaching Competence The explanation is missing a description of how 1 or more of the design choices for spacing, colors, and typography work together to enhance the user experience, or any design choice is not appropriate or not reinforced with a relevant code snippet. | Competent The explanation includes a description of how the design choices for spacing, colors, and typography work together to enhance the user experience, and each design choice is appropriate and reinforced with a relevant code snippet. |
C3:RESPONSIVE DESIGN APPROACH
Not Evident An explanation of the responsive design approach is not provided. | Approaching Competence The explanation of the responsive design approach does not include any technique used to ensure web page screen size adaptation, or the explanation is not accurate or not reinforced with a relevant code snippet. | Competent The explanation of the responsive design approach includes 1 technique used to ensure web page screen size adaptation, and the explanation is accurate and reinforced with a relevant code snippet. |
D1:AI REFINEMENT TO HTML
Not Evident A refinement is not provided. | Approaching Competence The refinement is not appropriate, or the refinementcompromises or replaces the foundational code, or the refinement does not include a screen capture of the AI chat as evidence. | Competent The refinement includes appropriate enhancements to part A of Phase I, without compromising or replacing the foundational code, and includes a screen capture of the AI chat as evidence. |
D2:AI REFINEMENT TO CSS
Not Evident A refinement is not provided. | Approaching Competence The refinement is not appropriate, or the refinement compromises or replaces the foundational code, or the refinement does not include a screen capture of the AI chat as evidence. | Competent The refinement includes appropriate enhancements to part B of Phase I, without compromising or replacing the foundational code, and includes a screen capture of the AI chat as evidence. |
E1:AI-SUGGESTED CHANGES
Not Evident A description of AI-suggested changes is not provided. | Approaching Competence The description includes fewer than 2 changes suggested by AI, or 1 or more changes are not clearly explained or are not derived from AI suggestions. | Competent The description includes 2 changes suggested by AI, and each change is clear and derived from AI suggestions. |
E2:IMPACT OF AI CHANGES
Not Evident An explanation of the impact of AI-suggested changes is not provided. | Approaching Competence The explanation of the impact of each AI-suggested change is unclear, or 1 or more explanations do not relate to functionality, design, or user experience. | Competent The explanation of the impact of each AI-suggested change is clear and relates to functionality, design, or user experience. |
E3:AI LESSON LEARNED
Not Evident The description does not offer a clear lesson learned about using AI in web development. | Approaching Competence The description of the lesson learned is not clear or is not relevant to web development. | Competent The description of the lesson learned is clear and relevant to web development. |
F:SOURCES
Not Evident The submission does not include both in-text citations and a reference list for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized. | Approaching Competence The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list; however, the citations or reference list is incomplete or inaccurate. | Competent The submission includes in-text citations for sources that are properly quoted, paraphrased, or summarized and a reference list that accurately identifies the author, date, title, and source location as available. |
G:PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION
Not Evident This submission includes pervasive errors in professional communication related to grammar, sentence fluency, contextual spelling, or punctuation, negatively impacting the professional quality and clarity of the writing. Specific errors have been identified by Grammarly for Education under the Correctness category. | Approaching Competence This submission includes substantial errors in professional communication related to grammar, sentence fluency, contextual spelling, and/or punctuation. Specific errors have been identified by Grammarly for Education under the Correctness category. | Competent This submission includes satisfactory use of grammar, sentence fluency, contextual spelling, and punctuation, which promote accurate interpretation and understanding. |