Overview
For your signature assignment, compose a 3- to 4-page case analysis (in addition to a title page, abstract, and reference list page) written in APA Style citing at least 3 references with one non-Internet reference. The following should be covered in the paper:
- Title Page: Case Title, Full Name, Section, Date, Instructor, and Campus
- Abstract: Summarize the case o One non-indented paragraph on a separate page. This will be page 2.
- Introduction: The physiological importance of the liver, pancreas, and kidneys for the proper functioning of the human body
- Body: Response to the prompts: Organize your analysis with headings that thoroughly answer the prompts (e.g., “Abnormal Glucose Levels” for question 1).
- Explain each prompt in depth with physiological concepts and provide sufficient evidence from the literature for each prompt. o Include normal physiological ranges (if it applies).
- Maintain the order of questions when answering.
- Conclusion: Summarize the paper in a paragraph.
Support your opinions with evidence from your readings and research. Review the rubric for complete grading criteria. THE RUBRIC IS BELOW PLEASE FOLLOW EXACTLY WHAT MY RUBRIC IS ASKING FOR. Make sure there is NO PLAGIARISM.
Content/Information Prompt #1 | 5.6 to >4.76 ptsExceeds ExpectationsAddresses the entire prompt correctly with great depth and details. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.4.76 to >4.03 ptsMeets ExpectationsAddresses the entire prompt correctly without depth or any details. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient. 4.03 to >3.3 ptsApproaches ExpectationsPartially addresses the prompt correctly. Information is mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically sound.3.3 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDoes not address any portion of the prompt correctly. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary, or sufficient. | 5.6 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent/Information Prompt #2 | 5.6 to >4.76 ptsExceeds ExpectationsAddresses the entire prompt correctly with great depth and details. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.4.76 to >4.03 ptsMeets ExpectationsAddresses the entire prompt correctly without depth or any details. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough, necessary and sufficient. 4.03 to >3.3 ptsApproaches ExpectationsPartially addresses the prompt correctly. Information is mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically sound.3.3 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDoes not address any portion of the prompt correctly. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary, or sufficient. | 5.6 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent/Information Prompt #3 | 5.6 to >4.76 ptsExceeds ExpectationsAddresses the entire prompt correctly with great depth and details. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.4.76 to >4.03 ptsMeets ExpectationsAddresses the entire prompt correctly without depth or any details. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient. 4.03 to >3.3 ptsApproaches ExpectationsPartially addresses the prompt correctly. Information is mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically sound.3.3 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDoes not address any portion of the prompt correctly. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary, or sufficient. | 5.6 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent/Information Prompt #4 | 5.6 to >4.76 ptsExceeds ExpectationsAddresses the entire prompt correctly with great depth and details.Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.4.76 to >4.03 ptsMeets ExpectationsAddresses the entire prompt correctly without depth or any details.Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient. 4.03 to >3.3 ptsApproaches ExpectationsPartially addresses the prompt correctly. Information is mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically sound.3.3 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDoes not address any portion of the prompt correctly.Information is not scientifically sound, necessary, or sufficient. | 5.6 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent/Information Prompt #5 | 5.6 to >4.76 ptsExceeds ExpectationsAddresses the entire prompt correctly with great depth and details.Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.4.76 to >4.03 ptsMeets ExpectationsAddresses the entire prompt correctly without depth or any details.Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient. 4.03 to >3.3 ptsApproaches ExpectationsPartially addresses the prompt correctly. Information is mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically sound.3.3 to >0 ptsDoes Not Meet ExpectationsDoes not address any portion of the prompt correctly.Information is not scientifically sound, necessary, or sufficient. | 5.6 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent/Information Prompt #6 | 5.6 to >4.76 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly with great depth and details. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.4.76 to >4.03 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly without depth or any details. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient. 4.03 to >3.3 ptsPartially addresses the prompt correctly. Information is mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically sound.3.3 to >0 ptsDoes not address any portion of the prompt correctly. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary, or sufficient. | 5.6 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent/Information Prompt #7 | 5.6 to >4.76 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly with great depth and details. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.4.76 to >4.03 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly without depth or any details. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient. 4.03 to >3.3 ptsPartially addresses the prompt correctly. Information is mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically sound.3.3 to >0 ptsDoes not address any portion of the prompt correctly. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary, or sufficient. | 5.6 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent/Information Prompt #8 | 5.6 to >4.76 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly with great depth and details. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.4.76 to >4.03 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly without depth or any details. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient. 4.03 to >3.3 ptsPartially addresses the prompt correctly. Information may not be scientifically sound, necessary, or sufficient.3.3 to >0 ptsDoes not address any portion of the prompt correctly. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary, or sufficient. | 5.6 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent/Information Prompt #9 | 5.6 to >4.76 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly with great depth and details. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary and sufficient.4.76 to >4.03 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly without depth or any details. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough, necessary and sufficient. 4.03 to >3.3 ptsPartially addresses the prompt correctly. Information is mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically sound.3.3 to >0 ptsDoes not address any portion of the prompt correctly. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary or sufficient. | 5.6 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent/Information Prompt #10 | 5.6 to >4.76 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly with great depth and details. Information is scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient.4.76 to >4.03 ptsAddresses the entire prompt correctly without depth or any details. Information is mostly scientifically sound, thorough, necessary, and sufficient. 4.03 to >3.3 ptsPartially addresses the prompt correctly. Information is mostly insufficient and may not be scientifically sound.3.3 to >0 ptsDoes not address any portion of the prompt correctly. Information is not scientifically sound, necessary, or sufficient. | 5.6 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and Assignment Requirements | 5.6 to >4.76 ptsDemonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s). Introduction, abstract, and conclusion serve to bring cohesion and clarity to the assignment topic. Presents coherently and logically organized ideas that are thoughtful and in-depth. Meets all length requirements and addresses all aspects of the assignment. Meets the required number of resources, and all sources meet the assignment specifications.4.76 to >4.03 ptsDemonstrates an adequate understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s). Introduction, abstract, and conclusion generally serve to bring cohesion and clarity to the assignment topic, but there may be some redundancy or unnecessary information. Ideas are mostly coherent and organized. Meets all length requirements and addresses all aspects of the assignment. Meets the required number of resources, and all sources meet the assignment specifications. 4.03 to >3.3 ptsDemonstrates a vague or incorrect understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s). Introduction, abstract, and conclusion do not add cohesion and clarity to the assignment topic. Several ideas are incoherent and disorganized. Meets some length requirements and addresses some aspects of the assignment. Meets the required number of resources, and some meet the assignment specifications.3.3 to >0 ptsDemonstrates little or no understanding of the topic(s) and issue(s). Introduction, abstract, and conclusion are missing or insufficient. Meets few, if any, assignment and reference criteria. | 5.6 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA and Mechanics | 8.4 to >7.14 ptsThe assignment consistently follows current APA format and is free from errors in formatting, citation, and references. There are no grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are cited and referenced correctly.7.14 to >6.05 ptsThe assignment consistently follows current APA format with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are cited and referenced correctly. 6.05 to >4.96 ptsThe assignment does not follow current APA format and/or has many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Many sources are cited and referenced incorrectly, or citations and references are missing where needed.4.96 to >0 ptsNo attempt to follow APA format is indicated. Sources are not used and/or there is no reference page. Mechanical errors significantly interfere with the readability of the paper. | 8.4 pts |