OnlineNursingOwl
← All nursing posts

Communications · Studypool

Communications Question

INSTRUCTIONS

Format

  • ion I will gladly provide. (I think only chapter 5 from my book is needed so I can give that.)

INSTRUCTIONS

Directions:

Adapted from Armfield, G. G. (2017). Organizational Culture Analysis (modified)

For this paper, you will become an organizational culture detective as you will develop your ability to analyze organizational culture. This skill will benefit you when searching for internships during college or accepting any career position. Organizational employees are assimilated by organizational culture and persuaded to act, think and believe based on employers. Choose an organization (for profit or nonprofit) that you are familiar with or frequent. Typical organizations used for this assignment include restaurants, retail stores, charities, churches, or school groups. This assignment will develop your ability to connect real-world observations, findings, and theoretical application regarding organizational culture and assimilation.

Spend some time researching and observing an organization either in person or virtually. You could also conduct an interview or use online materials to supplement your analysis, such as the company website, news interviews and press releases, etc. Remember you are looking for artifacts, espoused values and basic underlying assumptions.

The elements of culture can help you better categorize information into Schein's model. Here are some optional questions you may consider for the assignment: Are there organizational heroes? What are the organizational rites and/or rituals? What organizational symbols reveal information about Schien’s three levels? What are the artifacts that are revealed? What are the espoused values? What are some core assumptions that organizational members hold?

Introduction

Briefly, describe the organization and provide relevant history of the organization you've chosen and what makes it interesting to you for this culture analysis.

Body

Present each of the three levels of Schein's model using 3-5 examples for each (3-5 artifacts, 3-5 espoused values and 3-5 underlying assumptions). What do the elements within each level say about the company.

Next, synthesize within by connecting a minimum of three expressions of culture to each category (heroes, rites and rituals, cultural network, practices, vocabulary, metaphors, stories, relevant constructs, etc.; Ch. 5). It's ok if these overlap some. For example, Sarah Tracy researches the use of humor in organizations. If a company has an espoused value of "work hard and laugh hard," I can relate that to practices or language and possibly describe a practice that embodies that value. The expressions of culture are the mechanisms through which we see culture in action, and are reinforced through artifacts, values, and assumptions. So think, for example, do they use a metaphor to convey a value or vice versa?

A. Artifacts

B. Espoused values

C. Assumptions

D. Identify any misalignments in the data you found or in practice if you have personal examples as a customer/client/employee, or make one practical suggestion the company could make to increase organizational communication effectiveness, from an organizational communication perspective.

Conclusion

Finish your paper by describing how using Schein’s theoretical model and the expressions of culture have helped you to understand organizational interactions and communication. Briefly, recap the main points of the paper and close your analysis by discussing what you learned from completing this assignment and reflect on what you understand that you did not prior to completing this assignment.

Format

This paper should be essay style with an introduction, transitions, body, and conclusion. The paper should be about 3-4 typed pages, double-spaced (12 pt. font, one inch margins top, bottom, left, and right)

No references required, but if you use an outside source (other than Ch. 5) you should cite it. In lieu of this, throughout your analysis, please do mention if you were looking on a website or yelp reviews, etc. A simple, according to the home page of the communication Studies Department at TCU...

Additionally, please proofread for grammatical and typographical errors.

RUBRIC:

Criteria

Level 5

Level 4

Level 3

Level 2

Level 1

Criterion Score

Organizational Description

3.76–5.00 points

Accomplishes everything from the previous category, but demonstrates unique creativity and/or thoughtfulness in the presentation.

2.51–3.75 points

Correctly describes the organization. Properly uses terminology from the chapter and lecture. The description is interesting.

1.26–2.50 points

Correctly and adequately describes the organization However, descriptors from the lecture or chapter are not used.

0.01–1.25 points

May describe the organization, but the description lacks significant detail.

0.00 points

Does not adequately describe the organization

Score of Organizational Description,

/ 5

Characteristics and Descriptors of Organizational Culture

19–20 points

Accomplishes everything from the previous category and draws a link to other concepts discussed in the chapter or in lecture. Unique creativity and/or thoughtfulness in the presentation is demonstrated.

17–18 points

Correctly discusses all three of Schein’s stages. Properly identifies a minimum of three descriptors of organizational culture. An adequate number of examples are used to support the discussion.

15–16 points

Correctly discusses three of Schein’s stages and two of the descriptors of organizational culture. Provides a minimal number of examples to support the discussion.

13–14 points

Only addresses one or two of Schein’s stages. Or the student only addresses one of the descriptors of organizational culture. Examples may be inappropriate.

0–12 points

Does not correctly define or identify any of Schein’s stages. There are no examples.

Score of Characteristics and Descriptors of Organizational Culture,

/ 20

Organizational Culture and two additional constructs from chapter or throughout class so far

11.26–15.00 points

Accomplishes everything from the previous category, and demonstrates unique creativity and/or thoughtfulness in the presentation. Story telling is exemplary. A clear understanding of the strategic organizational communication choices being used is illustrated in the paper.

7.51–11.25 points

Properly elaborates on one additional organizational construct. Correctly applies examples and tells a story showing complete understanding of the construct. A clear understanding of the strategic organizational communication (internally or externally) choices being used is demonstrated.

3.76–7.50 points

Correctly discusses one additional organizational construct. May apply examples but the understanding is not obvious to the reader. Story telling is adequate.

0.01–3.75 points

Does not correctly identify two additional organizational construct. The student does not correctly apply examples to organizational culture.

0.00 points

Does not elaborate on any additional organizational dynamics discussed in class or in the textbook

Score of Organizational Culture and two additional constructs from chapter or throughout class so far,

/ 15

Introduction, Body, Conclusion, Reflection format

3.76–5.00 points

Accomplishes everything from the previous category, but demonstrates unique creativity and/or thoughtfulness in the presentation.

2.51–3.75 points

Properly uses a hook (attention device), states a clear thesis, and previews the major sections of the paper. Generates interesting and accurate reflections. The conclusion is structured with a summary and closing statement.

1.26–2.50 points

May be lacking parts of the introduction, or the reflection portion is inadequate and/or the conclusion is lacking structure.

0.01–1.25 points

The introduction clearly lacks one or two of the requirements. The reflection portion is cursory. The conclusion is not structured in any relevant sense.

0.00 points

The reflection is missing. The introduction and conclusion is nonexistent.

Score of Introduction, Body, Conclusion, Reflection format,

/ 5

Grammar, Presentation, Style

3.76–5.00 points

Good presentation. Clearly has been proofread. Proper in-text citation and citations are used correctly without error. Extraordinarily few if any grammar or typographic errors.

2.51–3.75 points

Adequate presentation. Clearly has been proofread. Proper in-text citation and references are used. Few grammar or typographic errors.

1.26–2.50 points

Adequate presentation. Proofreading is suspect. Proper in-text citation and references may be used. Quite a few grammar or typographic errors.

0.01–1.25 points

Less than satisfactory presentation. Does not adhere to the requirements. Grammar and typographic errors are distracting.

0.00 points

Clearly does not follow the requirements or any standard conventions of writing. Grammar and typographic errors get in the way of comprehension.