select a key issue tied to digital culture or the broader digital ecosystem that you have a personal connection to or have strong opinions about. You will develop it into a focused analytic paper and a presentation.
suggest Title: The Impact of ChatGPT on Professional Communication: Opportunities, Challenges, and Ethical Considerations
Research Question: How has ChatGPT transformed professional communication, and what opportunities and ethical challenges does its adoption create for individuals and organizations?
Thesis Statement: While ChatGPT has significantly improved efficiency and productivity in professional communication, it also raises important concerns about originality, accuracy, critical thinking, and ethical responsibility. Therefore, ChatGPT should be used as a tool to support human communication rather than replace human judgment.
Formatting
- Style: Your paper should be written in narrative form, using complete sentences and paragraphs. Your presentation should thoughtfully integrate text and different types of media (e.g., images, graphics, art, video) to convey the entirety of the information. for guidance on formatting and designing a strong presentation.
- Length: Your paper should be approximately 10–12 pages in length, double-spaced, including a title page and a brief abstract, but not including charts or graphs. Your presentation will consist of 6–8 slides, but the duration of your in-class presentation will be determined by your instructor and shared in advance to allow you sufficient time to prepare.
- APA Formatting: Please adhere to the for headers, spacing (double-spaced), and citations.
- Submission: You will submit two files from the File Upload tab. Choose Upload File to upload your paper. Then, select Add Another File to upload your presentation slide deck. Once both files are uploaded, choose Submit Assignment.
Rubric
Midterm and Final Assessment Grading Rubric (Papers, Case Studies, Multimedia)
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity & Course Learning | 20 to >15.0 ptsPoints made are clear, direct, and concise, and demonstrate comprehensive understanding of course learning.15 to >5.0 ptsPoints could be clarified or made more direct or concise in areas, and demonstrate a fundamental understanding of course concepts. 5 to >0 ptsPoints made were ambiguous, unclear, indirect, or verbose, with little demonstration of course learning. | 20 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLogical Analysis & Scholarly Backing | 20 to >15.0 ptsAnalysis is logical and well synthesized, and backed by scholarly thought throughout.15 to >5.0 ptsLogical analysis is inconsistent (i.e., makes leaps) in areas or utilizes weak sources. 5 to >0 ptsLogical analysis is inadequate or relies on opinion and/or statements without evidence or scholarly support. | 20 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization | 20 to >15.0 ptsWell organized, with clear sequencing and appropriate transitions throughout.15 to >5.0 ptsMostly organized, with some unclear transitions. 5 to >0 ptsDisorganized, with unclear sequencing and poor or missing transitions. | 20 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication: Effectiveness & Delivery | 20 to >15.0 ptsCommunication of materials is highly effective and appropriately addresses the content and audience with excellent delivery in the designated length.15 to >5.0 ptsCommunication is somewhat effective or does not address the content or target audience. Delivery is strained or falls short/exceeds the designated length. 5 to >0 ptsCommunication is ineffective and does not address the content or target audience. Delivery is poor or difficult to understand. Falls short/exceeds the designated length. | 20 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar & APA Citations | 20 to >15.0 ptsNo grammatical or citation errors, with excellent sentence structure and fluency.15 to >5.0 ptsA few overlooked grammatical or citation errors. 5 to >0 ptsSeveral errors in spelling, punctuation, sentence structure, and/or citations, showing carelessness. | 20 pts |
Total Points: 100