Short Reflection Essay on Module 5
This is an open book/open note reflection paper, which will be uploaded to Canvas. It will be based on the lectures, presentations and readings. The students will answer the question given by the instructor, not exceeding 1500 words. Resources used in the Reflection should be cited. The assignment is based on 25 points shown on the Rubric. Please check your Reflection thoroughly before submitting, as you only have one chance to submit it.
Question: Economic performance is the outcome of a complex constellation of social / cultural/ political relationships and how of those factors interact with geographical settings. Looking at the southeastern Asian Countries, pls choose one country which was not discussed in class and explain the main factors that had an impact on its growth pattern in the second half of the 20th century and 21st century.
Rubric
Rubric for Reflection Essay (3)
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOverall Impression | 5 to >4.2 ptsExcellentAuthor directly addresses the main question or issue, and adds new insight to the subject not provided in lectures, readings, or class discussions. The author has retained nearly all of the knowledge presented in class.4.2 to >3.4 ptsProficientAuthor competently addresses main question or issue, but does not add much new insight into the subject. That said, it is clear that the author has learned a great deal in class and is able to communicate this knowledge to others. 3.4 to >2.6 ptsLimitedAuthor attempts to address the main question or issue, but fails. The author has retained some information from the course, but does not fully understand its meaning or context and cannot clearly convey it to others.2.6 to >0 ptsPoorEssay does NOT address the main question or issue, and it is obvious that the author has not retained any information from the course. | 5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeArgument | 5 to >4.2 ptsExcellentEssay contains a clear argument—i.e., lets the reader know exactly what the author is trying to communicate.4.2 to >3.4 ptsProficientAn argument is present, but reader must reconstruct it from the text. 3.4 to >2.6 ptsLimitedAuthor attempts, but fails, to make an argument (e.g., starts with a rhetorical question/statement or anecdote that is never put into context).2.6 to >0 ptsPoorNo attempt is made to articulate an argument. | 5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence | 5 to >4.2 ptsExcellentProvides compelling and accurate evidence that convinces reader to accept main argument. The importance/relevance of all pieces of evidence is clearly stated. There are no gaps in reasoning—i.e., the reader does not need to assume anything or do additional research to accept main argument.4.2 to >3.4 ptsProficientProvides necessary evidence to convince reader of most aspects of the main argument but not all. The importance/ relevance of some evidence presented may not be totally clear. Reader must make a few mental leaps or do some additional research to fully accept all aspects of main argument. 3.4 to >2.6 ptsLimitedNot enough evidence is provided to support the author's argument, or evidence is incomplete, incorrect, or oversimplified. Information from lectures and readings is not effectively used.2.6 to >0 ptsPoorEither no evidence is provided, or there are numerous factual mistakes, omissions or oversimplifications. There is little or no mention of information from lectures and readings. | 5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources | 5 to >4.2 ptsExcellentEvidence is used from a wide range of sources, including lectures and course readings. When required, the author also consults scholarly books, websites, journal articles, etc. not explicitly discussed in class.4.2 to >3.4 ptsProficientEvidence is used from many sources, but the author relies heavily on a more limited set of sources. Some effort is made to go beyond material presented in class when required, but not much. If outside sources are used, they are primarily non-scholarly (i.e., intended for a general audience) and/or web-based. 3.4 to >2.6 ptsLimitedUses only a few of the sources provided in class, or does not go beyond what has been provided by professor when required to do additional research.2.6 to >0 ptsPoorDoes not use sources, only minimally uses sources provided by instructor, or relies exclusively on non-scholarly outside sources. | 5 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity and Style | 5 to >4.2 ptsExcellentAll sentences are grammatically correct and clearly written. No words are misused or unnecessarily fancy. Technical terms, words from other languages, and words from other historical periods are always explained. All information is accurate and up-to-date. Paper has been spell-checked AND proofread (ideally by you and somebody else), and contains no errors.4.2 to >3.4 ptsProficientAll sentences are grammatically correct and clearly written. An occasional word is misused or unnecessarily fancy. Technical terms, words from other languages, and words from other historical periods are usually, but not always, explained. All information is accurate and up-to-date. Paper has been spell-checked AND proofread, and contains no more than a few minor errors, which do not adversely affect the reader’s ability to understand the essay. 3.4 to >2.6 ptsLimitedA few sentences are grammatically incorrect or not clearly written. Several words are misused. Technical terms, words from other languages, and words from other historical periods are rarely explained. Not all information is accurate and up-to-date. Paper has been spell-checked AND proofread, but still contains several errors. Reader’s ability to understand essay may be compromised by these errors.2.6 to >0 ptsPoorPaper is full of grammatical errors and bad writing. Several words are misused. Technical terms, words from other languages, and words from other historical periods are rarely explained. Not all information is accurate and up-to-date. Paper has not been spell-checked or proofread, and contains numerous errors. Reader has a difficult time understanding essay because of errors. | 5 pts |