Download the file Homework 4 Download Homework 4, and work on the Simio problems. Once finished, submit your homework on a .pdf or a .docx file, plus your Simio model file(.spfx). Submit the assignment by the deadline.
Note Problem 2 requires to use the following Simio FileDownload Simio File
When answering the questions on each problem, provide screenshots from the model, and explanations about the decisions you have made.
PS: No points will be awarded in the problems if models are not uploaded as well.
Rubric
Homework 4
Homework 4
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeModel 1 - Built and experiment | | 15 to >10.0 pts Correct Model Built, or with minimal errors The model built is flawless, or presents minimum errors that do not mess up with the results (Errors in the run, or experiment set up are also considered here). | 10 to >5.0 pts Model was built with logic errors The model built presents logic errors, which causes problems with the results, but it is still operating with no issues. | 5 to >0 pts Model is not working, or is missing The model built is incorrect, and it is not working at all, or just missing. |
| 15 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeModel 1 - Second Scenario & Decision Arguments | | 10 to >7.0 pts Goal reached and excellent explanation The expected goal was met with the changes in the model and the justification and/or explanation of changes is neat and clear, acknowledging potential trade-offs in the system. | 7 to >3.0 pts Goal not reached and moderate explanation The expected goal was not met with the changes in the models and/or the justification and explanation of the changes is adequate, but it does not provide a clear explanation of the changes done in the system. | 3 to >0 pts Goal not reach and poor explanation The expected goal was not met; either because of poor changes in the model or because there are not any changes. Explanation lacks clarity and/or justification, or it is missing. |
| 10 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeModel 2 - Built and experiment | | 15 to >10.0 pts Correct Model Built, or with minimal errors The model built is flawless, or presents minimum errors that do not mess up with the results (Errors in the run, or experiment set up are also considered here). | 10 to >5.0 pts Model was built with logic errors The model built presents logic errors, which causes problems with the results, but it is still operating with no issues. | 5 to >0 pts Model is not working, or is missing The model built is incorrect, and it is not working at all, or just missing. |
| 15 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeModel 2 - Second Scenario & Decision Arguments | | 10 to >7.0 pts Goal reached and excellent explanation The expected goal was met with the changes in the model and the justification and/or explanation of changes is neat and clear, acknowledging potential trade-offs in the system. | 7 to >3.0 pts Goal not reached and moderate explanation The expected goal was not met with the changes in the models and/or the justification and explanation of the changes is adequate, but it does not provide a clear explanation of the changes done in the system. | 3 to >0 pts Goal not reach and poor explanation The expected goal was not met; either because of poor changes in the model or because there are not any changes. Explanation lacks clarity and/or justification, or it is missing. |
| 10 pts
|
Total Points: 50 |