No need of an outline
Evidenced-Based Practice - Evaluating a Quantitative Research Study
Instructions
Critically evaluate Study 3. Evaluate the credibility of professional citation, research design, and procedures in a research article. Include a discussion on how this study contributes to evidence-based practice.
- Study 3 - Patients’ and partners’ health-related quality of life before and 4 months after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery
Additional Instructions:
- All submissions should have a title page and reference page.
- Utilize a minimum of two scholarly resources.
- Adhere to grammar, spelling and punctuation criteria.
- Adhere to APA compliance guidelines.
- Adhere to the chosen Submission Options for Delivery of Assignment guidelines.
*Choose One: | Instructions: |
|---|---|
Paper |
|
Microsoft PowerPoint Presentation |
|
Other media (Prezi, etc.) presentation |
|
Video Presentation |
|
Table |
|
Graphs or other illustrations |
|
Poster |
|
Note: Title and reference pages/slides do not count towards the count requirements. |
Evidenced-Based Practice - Evaluating a Quantitative Research Study | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Description: The baccalaureate graduate nurse will demonstrate an understanding of the basic elements of the research process and models for applying evidence to clinical practice. | ||||
Course Competencies: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 | ||||
QSEN Competencies: 1, 3, 4, 6 | ||||
The Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education: Domain 1, 4, 5, 8 | ||||
Competency | Mastery | Proficient | Acceptable | Acceptable Mastery Not Demonstrated |
Evaluates research design of study using all of the components of the evaluation checklists in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018). | Evaluates research design of study using all of the components of the evaluation checklists in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018). | Evaluates research design of study using (75%) components of the evaluation checklists in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018). | Evaluates research design of study using some (50% or less) components of the evaluation checklists in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018). | Does not address section. |
Evaluates methods/procedure, and results of the study using all of the components of the evaluation checklist in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018). | Evaluates methods/procedure, and results of the study using all of the components of the evaluation checklist in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018). | Evaluates methods/procedures and results of the study using (75%) components of the evaluation checklists in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018). | Evaluates methods/procedures and results of the study using some (50% or less) components of the evaluation checklists in LoBiondo-Wood & Haber, (2018). | Does not address section. |
Discusses the importance of research, how the study contributes to EBP and applicability of the specific study to clinical practice. | Discusses the importance of research, how the study contributes to EBP and applicability of the specific study to clinical practice . | Discusses the importance of research and how the study may contribute to EBP in general but not how the specific study contributes to current clinical practice. | Provides simple definitions of research and evidence but does not delve into the relationship among research, evidence-based practice and improving practice. | Does not address section. |
Three scholarly resources are utilized References cited appropriately and are not older than acceptable nursing program standards, unless they are considered seminal works References are from pertinent peer reviewed articles, journals or appropriate textbooks Web- references have authors, dates and can easily be accessed with the URL provided Unreliable references are avoided (e.g. Wikipedia) | Three scholarly resources are utilized All criteria were met. | Two scholarly resources are utilized AND/OR One of the 4 cited criteria was violated. | One resource for scholarly evidence is utilized. AND/OR More than one of the 4 cited criteria was violated. | No scholarly resources referenced. AND/OR More than 2 of the 4 cited criteria were violated. |
APA, Grammar, Spelling, and Punctuation | No errors in APA, grammar, spelling, and punctuation. | One to three errors in APA, grammar, spelling, and punctuation. | Four to six errors in APA, grammar, spelling, and punctuation. | Seven or more errors in APA, spelling, and punctuation. The submission does not meet format guidelines. |