Continuing with the Suburban Homes Construction Project case study found at the end of chapter 6 (and reviewing previous chapters 1 through 5), CPM 4e, complete the following individual assignment:
(20 points) Stakeholder identification and prioritization matrix (Exhibit 6-2)
(20 points) Stakeholder Matrix (Exhibit 6-4)
(20 points) Stakeholder Engagement Matrix (Exhibit 6-5)
(20 points) Communication Matrix (Exhibit 6-9)
(20 points) Mechanics
You will be assessed on content and mechanics.
Content (80 points): The content must be based on the case study materials and reading assignments. The PMBOK 6e and CPM 4e, along with other reputable resources can be used to supplement the responses through summarizing, paraphrasing and quoting those sources. Each matrix should be followed by a discussion of the matrix and how to use/interpret it.
Mechanics (20 points): The total assignment length should be at least 3 pages, not to exceed 4 pages. This is not an academic paper, therefore you do not need to follow APA guidelines. You should review the assignment rubric in Canvas to ensure that you address all aspects of each component to this assignment.
Your Instructor will use Turn-it-in to ensure your paper is authentic work. To avoid plagiarism, see the course home page for more information and use the Purdue Online Writing LabLinks to an external site. to learn how to paraphrase, summarize and cite the references you use in all academic writing assignments.
Rubric
Unit 6 Individual Assignment Rubric
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStakeholder ID and Priority Matrix (Exhibit 6-2) | 20 ptsExcellentAn ID and prioritization matrix includes at least 5 relevant stakeholders and rates them for power, interest, etc.17 ptsGoodAt least 5 relevant stakeholders with some minor errors in prioritization scores based on the SHCP. 14 ptsPoorLess than 5 relevant stakeholders and/or some major errors in prioritization scores based on the SHCP.0 ptsNot Submitted | 20 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStakeholder Matrix (Exhibit 6-4) | 20 ptsExcellentA stakeholder matrix includes at least 5 relevant stakeholders and explains their potential interests and necessary support/mitigation strategies17 ptsGoodA stakeholder matrix includes at least 5 relevant stakeholders but the explanations are not as complete as they could be. 14 ptsPoorMore details are clearly needed and/or less than 5 stakeholders are identified.0 ptsNot Submitted | 20 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStakeholder Engagement Matrix (Exhibit 6-5) | 20 ptsExcellentA matrix includes at least 5 relevant stakeholders with all matrix aspects fully completed and a engagement strategy that makes sense for the type of stakeholder17 ptsGoodA matrix includes at lest 5 relevant stakeholders but the positions, barriers to change or strategy are not sufficient or have minor errors 14 ptsPoorMore details are clearly needed and/or less than 5 stakeholders are included in the matrix.0 ptsNot Submitted | 20 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication Matrix (Exhibit 6-9) | 20 ptsExcellentA matrix including at least 5 relevant stakeholders with communication needs and other information relevant to the type of stakeholder and previous assessment.17 ptsGoodA matrix including at least 5 relevant stakeholders with some errors or omissions in the matrix making it less useful as a tool. 14 ptsPoorMore details are clearly needed and/or less than 5 stakeholders are identified0 ptsNot Submitted | 20 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics | 20 ptsExcellentMaterials submitted fully comply with mechanics requirements in assignment17 ptsGoodMaterials submitted do not fully comply due to some minor errors 10 ptsPoorMaterials submitted do not resemble the mechanics requirements, but some effort was made.0 ptsNot Submitted | 20 pts |
Total Points: 100