Download and complete the Concept Map Assignment template Download Concept Map Assignment templatebased on the assignment instructions Download assignment instructions.
If the assignment instructions do not require you to complete all examples, leave those items blank. Upload your completed map below.
Rubric
DFC Concept Map Assignment Level 3
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
|---|---|---|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSBAR | 4 ptsExemplaryLearner identified key client background information in SBAR format addressing the situation, background, assessment, and recommendation. This information gives a brief, yet comprehensive, overview of the client presentation.2 ptsDevelopingLearner identified key client background information in SBAR format, but one or more of the sections is missing key information: situation, background, assessment, and recommendation. 0 ptsDoes not meet expectationsLearner did not complete the SBAR section or does not include appropriate information for each section. | 4 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMap concept | 4 ptsExemplaryThe learner correctly chose the concept of the map which is identified from their HESI Dashboard ‘Weak Performance Areas’.2 ptsDevelopingA concept was identified, but the selected concept is not appropriate or applicable to the client's condition. This may also be selected if the concept chosen does not fit the information filled out in the map. 0 ptsDoes not meet expectationsThe learner did not identify a concept for the map. | 4 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecognize cues | 4 ptsExemplaryBased on available client data, the learner identified 5 relevant or important cues or information associated with the concept. Specific client values were included when appropriate (ie. heart rate, oxygen saturation, etc). Subjective and objective data could be considered.2 ptsDevelopingBased on available client data, the learner identified 4 relevant or important cues or information associated with the concept. Specific client values were included when appropriate (ie. heart rate, oxygen saturation, etc). Subjective and objective data could be considered. 0 ptsDoes not meet expectationsBased on available client data, the learner identified zero to 3 relevant or important cues or information associated with the concept. Specific client values were not included when appropriate (ie. heart rate, oxygen saturation, etc). | 4 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalyze cues | 4 ptsExemplaryBased on the cues identified, learner determined at least 3 conditions that might be present and are consistent with those cues.2 ptsDevelopingBased on the cues identified, learner determined 2 conditions that might be present and are consistent with those cues. 0 ptsDoes not meet expectationsBased on the cues identified, learner determined zero to 1 conditions that might be present and are consistent with those cues. | 4 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePrioritize hypotheses | 4 ptsExemplaryLearner used this strategy for this section: Where do I start? Based on the analysis of the client's condition, the learner determined which explanations are most likely. They listed and ranked at least 3 hypotheses according to most urgent problems and priority order.2 ptsDevelopingLearner used this strategy for this section: Where do I start? Based on the analysis of the client's condition, the learner determined which explanations are most likely. They listed and ranked 2 hypotheses according to most urgent problems and priority order. 0 ptsDoes not meet expectationsThe learner was unable to determine a hypothesis. | 4 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGenerate solutions: SMART goals | 4 ptsExemplaryUsing the hypotheses, the learner identified at least 5 desirable outcomes for the client. Goals were listed in SMART format (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound).2 ptsDevelopingUsing the hypotheses, the learner identified 4 desirable outcomes for the client. Goals were listed in SMART format (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound). 0 ptsDoes not meet expectationsUsing the hypotheses, the learner identified zero to 3 desirable outcome(s) for the client listed in correct SMART format (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time-bound). Also use this criterion if goals are not listed in SMART format. | 4 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTake action | 4 ptsExemplaryUsing the identified SMART goals, learner identified and described how at least 5 nursing interventions will be performed, administered, communicated, or taught. These interventions will address the priority concern and achieve the desired outcomes. Interventions are designed to help meet the client’s goals. Intervention #1 should be crafted to help meet SMART goal #1.2 ptsDevelopingUsing the identified SMART goals, learner identified and described how 4 nursing interventions will be performed, administered, communicated, or taught. These interventions will address the priority concern and achieve the desired outcomes. Interventions are designed to help meet the client’s goals. Intervention #1 should be crafted to help meet SMART goal #1. 0 ptsDoes not meet expectationsUsing the identified SMART goals, learner identified and described how zero to 3 nursing intervention(s) will be performed, administered, communicated, or taught. Also use this criterion if the intervention(s) is/are not crafted to help meet the corresponding client goals. | 4 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvaluate outcomes | 4 ptsExemplaryLearner compared observed outcomes against expected outcomes. For each of the 5 listed interventions, the learner was able to discuss how to determine if the identified interventions were effective. This section requires 5 evaluation criteria. The evaluation should contain subjective/objective data to support the evaluation. Learner was able to correctly evaluate if Goal #1 was accomplished by Intervention #1 by the time frame specified; this was repeated for goals and their associated interventions.2 ptsDevelopingLearner compared observed outcomes against expected outcomes. For 4 of the listed interventions, the learner was able to discuss how to determine if the identified interventions were effective. This section requires 4 evaluation criteria. The evaluation should contain subjective/objective data to support the evaluation. Learner was able to correctly evaluate if Goal #1 was accomplished by Intervention #1 by the time frame specified; this was repeated for goals and their associated interventions. 0 ptsDoes not meet expectationsLearner compared observed outcomes against expected outcomes. For each of listed interventions, the learner was able to discuss how to determine if the identified interventions were effective. This section contained zero to 3 evaluation criteria. The evaluation might also be missing subjective/objective data to support the evaluation. | 4 pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReference(s) | 3 ptsExemplaryLearner correctly completed a Reference page and included in-text citations giving credit to their source(s) using APA 7th edition format. Listed in the reference are the author, the publication year, and the source.1.5 ptsDevelopingLearner incorrectly applied APA 7th editional format to references and/or in-text citations. 0 ptsDoes not meet expectationsThe learner did not complete a Reference page or utilize in-text citations. | 3 pts |
Total Points: 35