Describe some of the antecedents available in your current (or past) workplace. Were they effective for supporting staff behavior? Why or why not, and (based on the materials in this module) how would you recommend changing them to make them more effective? Remember to review the Reflection Paper rubric and instructions in the Important Course Information module. Additionally, please include LINKS or DOIs to any articles or books referenced outside of the assigned readings as part of your APA citation (as is required when using web-based references). Failing to do so will result in point deductions. Category | 5 points | 3 points | 0 points | Reflection Length* *(excludes reference section and direct quotes from references that are longer than 5 words) | Reflection paper content was greater than 150 words. | Reflection paper content was between 100-149 words. | Reflection paper content was less than 99 words. | Grammar, Usage, and Spelling | Reflection paper contained less than 2 grammar, usage, or spelling errors. | Reflection paper contained 3-4 grammar, usage, or spelling errors. | Reflection paper contained more than 5 grammar, usage, or spelling errors and proofreading was not apparent. | References and Utilization of Outside Resources | The author used references from peer-reviewed behavioral sources in APA format and cited one or more original behavioral references, outside of the assigned readings. Hyperlinks to the cited external references are provided. | The author used references in APA format of assigned readings but did not include an additional peer-reviewed behavioral reference or did not include a hyperlink to the externally-cited reference. | The author neither utilized APA format for referenced material used nor cited a peer-reviewed behavioral reference. | Addressing the Prompt | The author’s reflection paper clearly responds to the assignment prompt, develops ideas cogently, organizes them logically, and supports them through empirical writing. | The author’s reflection paper clearly responds to the assignment prompt, develops ideas cogently, organizes them logically, and supports them through empirical writing. | The author’s reflection paper does not correspond with the assignment prompt, mainly discusses personal opinions, irrelevant information, or information is presented with limited logic and lack of development and organization of ideas. | Application | The author’s post clearly demonstrates application and relationship to the week’s assigned reading/topic. | The author’s post refers to the assigned topic/reading tangentially but does not demonstrate application. | The author’s post does not demonstrate application of the week’s assigned topic/reading. |
Late reflection papers will adhere to the general submission policy found on the Virtual Course Schedule. WARNING: Using Generative AI (ChatGPT or similar) is not permitted on these papers. If use of AI is suspected, the professor will meet with you to discuss your response. If you cannot discuss your response sufficiently, you will receive 0 points for your submission. If this occurs more than once, you will be reported to the dean for academic misconduct and may receive an F in the class and removal from the program. Previous Next |