OnlineNursingOwl
← All nursing posts

Health & Medical · Studypool

Health & Medical Question

Overview

In an effort to evaluate and develop an effective expatriate performance management system in the previously selected multinational corporation, you will write an essay analyzing performance management processes in multinational corporations.

Instructions

Please review the information posted in the Instructor Insights for resources to assist you.

In 2–4 pages, your assignment must address the following:

  • List the five variables that should be addressed in an expatriate performance management system.
  • Explain in detail each of the five variables that should be considered in the performance management system.
  • Evaluate the challenges with conducting performance evaluations for expatriates that differ from a traditional performance management system.

Integrate at least three supporting resources, one from the textbook and the others from the Strayer University Library databases.

INSTRUCTIONS

Format

  • ting. Please refer to the Library site for all support. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

Help Resources

The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:

  • Analyze performance management processes used to assess performance throughout a multinational corporation.
Week 6 Assignment Performance Management
Week 6 Assignment Performance Management
CriteriaRatingsPts
List the five variables that should be addressed in an expatriate performance management system.

37.5 to >33.75 pts

Exemplary

Listed the five variables that should be addressed in an expatriate performance management system.

33.75 to >30 pts

Competent

Listed four of the five variables that should be addressed in an expatriate performance management system.

30 to >22.5 pts

Satisfactory

Listed three of the five variables that should be addressed in an expatriate performance management system.

22.5 pts

Needs Improvement

Listed 1 - 2 of the five variables that should be addressed in an expatriate performance management system.

22.5 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Did not list the five variables that should be addressed in an expatriate performance management system.

/ 37.5 pts

Explain in detail each of the five variables that should be considered in the performance management system.

45 to >40.5 pts

Exemplary

Explained in detail each of the five variables that should be considered in the performance management system.

40.5 to >36 pts

Competent

Explained in detail four of the five variables that should be considered in the performance management system.

36 to >27 pts

Satisfactory

Explained in detail three of the five variables that should be considered in the performance management system.

27 pts

Needs Improvement

Explained in detail 1 – 2 of the five variables that should be considered in the performance management system.

27 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Did not explain in detail each of the five variables that should be considered in the performance management system.

/ 45 pts

Evaluate the challenges with conducting performance evaluations for expatriates that differ from a traditional performance management system.

45 to >40.5 pts

Exemplary

Evaluated the challenges with conducting performance evaluations for expatriates that differ from a traditional performance management system.

40.5 to >36 pts

Competent

Described the challenges with conducting performance evaluations for expatriates that differ from a traditional performance management system.

36 to >27 pts

Satisfactory

Identified the challenges with conducting performance evaluations for expatriates that differ from a traditional performance management system.

27 pts

Needs Improvement

Provided a general statement about the challenges of conducting performance evaluations but did not identify, describe, or evaluate the challenges with conducting performance evaluations for expatriates that differ from a traditional performance management system.

27 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Did not evaluate the challenges with conducting performance evaluations for expatriates that differ from a traditional performance management system.

/ 45 pts

Utilize three quality sources. Sources are credible, relevant, appropriate, and cited correctly.

15 to >13.5 pts

Exemplary

Utilized three quality sources that are credible, relevant, appropriate, and are cited correctly.

13.5 to >12 pts

Competent

Utilized three quality sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate but have 1 error in the citations.

12 to >9 pts

Satisfactory

Utilized three quality sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate but have 2 errors in the citations.

9 pts

Needs Improvement

Utilized fewer than three sources, or sources are not credible, relevant, or appropriate. More than 2 errors in the citations.

9 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Did not utilize or did not cite resources used in the assignment.

/ 15 pts

Clarity, writing mechanics, and SWS formatting requirements.

7.5 to >6.75 pts

Exemplary

0–2 errors present.

6.75 to >6 pts

Competent

3–4 errors present.

6 to >4.5 pts

Satisfactory

5–6 errors present.

4.5 pts

Needs Improvement

7–8 errors present.

4.5 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

More than eight errors present.

/ 7.5 pts

Total Points: 0