Overview
Review the translation frameworks PowerPoint attached.
Choose two possible/potential translation frameworks to help guide your project implementation and evaluation.
Describe the elements of the frameworks, how the elements are related to your project, and how they will be used for the translation of evidence in your project.
Critique their utility for your problem, practice setting, and the aims you intend to accomplish. Then, conclude with which one would be most pertinent for your project purpose and organization, and explain your rationale. In addition, attach as an Appendix to your paper a visual of the chosen framework with variables from your project inserted as appropriate.format.
Section | Description | Points Possible |
Introduction | Introduces the problem, presents a brief overview of how the evidence guides the selected intervention | 0 – 2 points |
Descriptions of Translation Frameworks | Selects and describes 2 translation frameworks, how the frameworks are related to the project, and how they could be used for translating the evidence in the project. | 0 – 4 points |
Critique of Frameworks | Provides a thorough and thoughtful critique of each translation framework, including the strengths and limitations, and the utility of each translation framework in the context of the organization/practice setting and project aims. | 0 – 4 points |
Selection of Framework | Thoughtful selection of the optimal translation framework to translate evidence in the project. Provides clear rationale for its use. | 0 – 3 points |
Diagram | Provides a diagram of the selected translation framework that includes details of how the selected framework will be used in the context of the problem, the organization/practice setting, and project aims | 0 – 3 points |
Scholarly Writing | Paper is formatted per APA style. Writing flows with well-connected thoughts/phrases, is free of grammatical errors, typos, jargon, and colloquialisms. | 0 – 4 points |
Total Points Possible | 20 |
ATTACHMENTS