Not EvidentAn explanation of the preferred ethical lens is not provided.
Evaluator Comments: Attempt 2
The response inaccurately identifies the student’s ELI results report lens as the Results Lens. This response does not align with the attached ELI report.
STUDY LINK: For additional instruction on this aspect, please click on the gray expansion arrow next to the aspect title.
D1a: Different SettingsNot Evident
Additional ResourcesNot EvidentAn analysis of whether the candidate has the same preferred lens in different settings is not provided.
Evaluator Comments: Attempt 2
Because the incorrect lens is identified in part D1, part D1a cannot be appropriately evaluated. Once part D1 has been revised, part D1a should be revised to align with it.
STUDY LINK: For additional instruction on this aspect, please click on the gray expansion arrow next to the aspect title.
D2: Primary Value and Classical VirtueNot Evident
Additional ResourcesNot EvidentAn explanation of a primary value or a classical virtue from the ELI is not provided.
Evaluator Comments: Attempt 2
The discussion in Part D2 inaccurately identifies a primary value of Autonomy and a classical virtue of Prudence, which does not align with the submitted ELI results report and renders the discussion irrelevant. Once part D1 has been revised, part D2 should be revised to align with it and with the student’s specific ELI results.
STUDY LINK: For additional instruction on this aspect, please click on the gray expansion arrow next to the aspect title.
D2a: Comparison to ValuesNot Evident
Additional ResourcesNot EvidentA comparison of the primary value from part D2 with 1 self-identified or personal value is not provided. Or a comparison of the classical virtue from part D2 with a different self-identified or personal value is not provided.
Evaluator Comments: Attempt 2
The response in Part D2a compares the stated primary value and classical virtue to two different personal values. Because D2 does not accurately identify the primary value and classical virtue from the attached ELI, the comparisons in D2a are invalid. Once parts D1 and D2 are revised, part D2a should be revised to align with them.
STUDY LINK: For additional instruction on this aspect, please click on the gray expansion arrow next to the aspect title.
D3: Blind Spot, Risk, Double Standard or ViceNot Evident
Additional ResourcesNot EvidentA description of the blind spot, risk, double standard, or vice from the candidate’s ELI is not provided.
Evaluator Comments: Attempt 2
Part D3 describes an ethical liability and blind spot related to ends-justify-the-means thinking. The response is invalid because it does not align with the attached ELI results report.
STUDY LINK: For additional instruction on this aspect, please click on the gray expansion arrow next to the aspect title.
D3a: Making Better Ethical DecisionsNot Evident
Additional ResourcesNot EvidentA discussion of 2 steps that can be taken to mitigate the chosen blind spot, risk, double standard, or vice in order to make better ethical decisions in the future is not provided.
Evaluator Comments: Attempt 2
Because part D3 does not accurately describe the blind spot from the attached ELI report, the mitigation steps discussed in the response are not aligned and the response is invalid.
STUDY LINK: For additional instruction on this aspect, please click on the gray expansion arrow next to the aspect title.
D4: Professional Use of ELINot Evident
Additional ResourcesNot EvidentA discussion of how the information from the candidate’s ELI could be applied to an ethical situation in the workplace is not provided.
Evaluator Comments: Attempt 2
Because earlier D aspects do not align with the attached ELI results, the discussion of applying ELI knowledge to a professional ethical situation is invalid. Once the correct ELI results are discussed in the rest of the report, part D4 should be revised to align with them.
STUDY LINK: For additional instruction on this aspect, please click on the gray expansion arrow next to the aspect title.
Also I Added my ELI REPORT