Overview
Writing Assignment 2
In a 3-5 page paper analyze and discuss the following:
Compare and contrast the theories of utilitarianism and deontology. Start by discussing each theory to set the stage. Then, compare and contrast these two theories using at least three examples of contemporary ethics issues to support the main assertions about these theories made in your paper. Lastly, consider a specific scenario you have experienced or witnessed, and are comfortable communicating about, and how you would apply these two theories to this personal experience and the outcome of that experience. What, if any, context does your examination of your experience though the lenses of philosophical theories support or perhaps challenge your initial assessment of the experience and/or it’s outcome. Do not simply use the examples covered in your reading material, the examples should be original to you and demonstrate philosophical reasoning, understanding of and application of the main concepts associated with utilitarianism and Kantianism (or other deontological ethics).
In completing your work, please adhere to the following:
- Your paper will be approximately 3-5 pages in length, excluding a cover page and references, typed and double spaced.
- Use at least 3-5 scholarly sources (NOT sources like wiki, dictionaries, news sites, and the like) in addition to the textbook and primary sources.
- Your work should use headings to best organize your work (for cohesion) and use a formal introduction and conclusion.
- Use appropriate composition, grammar, style, and format.
- Use proper APA citation - both in-text and in your references page.
- Adhere to academic honesty standards- zero tolerance policy for academic dishonesty. See also the statement on use of AI posted in the announcements.
- Submit your paper in a pdf, doc, rtf format. Do NOT submit a link to a shared drive, etc.
Assessment*:
Content (including substantive response to task, analysis, use of theory and course concepts to support main themes and positions) - 60%
Use of Appropriate Source Material, Cohesiveness, and Citation - 20%
Composition, Grammar, Style, Format, Length - 20%
*If submission violates academic honesty and/or use of AI policies, a grade of 0 will be entered.